Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal

High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Attempted Murder Under Section 307 IPC, Acquits Co-accused Due to Insufficient Evidence

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru upheld the conviction of an individual under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the attempted murder. The Court, in Criminal Appeal No. 932 of 2012, sentenced the appellant, accused of assaulting with a chopper and causing grievous injuries, to rigorous imprisonment for five years along with a fine of Rs. 5,000. In default, the accused faces a further one-year simple imprisonment.

The appellant, in an incident dating back to 2011, was convicted of assaulting the victim, identified as PW3 in the case, in a fit of enmity. The Court noted in its judgment, "The evidence of PW1, PW3, and PW5 will establish that appellant - accused No.1 assaulted PW3 with a chopper and caused injuries" (Para 8). The judgment clearly elaborated on the sequence of events and the role of the accused in the crime.

However, in a significant turn, the Court acquitted the co-accused, initially charged under Section 114 read with Section 307 of IPC. The acquittal of accused Nos. 2 and 3 came due to insufficient evidence against them. The Court observed, "The trial Court has erred in convicting appellant - accused Nos. 2 and 3 for the offence under Section 114 read with Section 307 of IPC" (Para 12).

This ruling is a reminder of the justice system's rigor in examining the available evidence and its implications. The detailed judgment, delivered by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shivashankar Amarnnavar, sheds light on the complexities involved in criminal trials, especially in cases involving multiple accused with varying degrees of involvement.                                                                                      

Date of Decision: 22 January, 2024

HARISH VS STATE OF KARNATAKA

 

Latest Legal News