Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case

High Court Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Vehicle Accident Case, Cites "Assessment Based on Income Tax Return"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh upheld the compensation awarded to a claimant who had sustained multiple fractures in a motor vehicle accident. The court's decision rested on various factors, including income assessment, permanent physical disability, and future loss of earnings.

The claimant, Mr. Gurmukh Singh, had been involved in a road accident on July 5, 2015, resulting in severe injuries to his left ankle. He underwent multiple surgeries and incurred substantial medical expenses during his treatment. Mr. Singh, an electrical contractor by profession, had a monthly income that was assessed based on his income tax return filed prior to the accident. The court considered this income tax return, which indicated an annual income of ₹2,46,300, in determining his monthly income as ₹20,525.

Furthermore, the court assessed the permanent physical disability of Mr. Singh at 25%, in contrast to the 40% assessed by the lower tribunal. This adjustment took into account the claimant's difficulty in running, standing for extended periods, and climbing stairs due to his left ankle injury.

The judgment also recognized the claimant's suffering and the impact on his life. Mr. Singh had been bedridden for several months after the accident, leading to a loss of income. The court acknowledged this and awarded compensation for pain and suffering, transportation charges, attendant charges, and loss of amenities of life.

Regarding interest, the court noted that the claimant was granted interest from the date after 30 days of the injury, in accordance with earlier precedents.

In summarizing its decision, the High Court upheld the compensation worth ₹10,61,660 awarded by the lower tribunal. As a result, the appeals filed by both the claimant and the insurance company were dismissed.

This judgment highlights the importance of considering income tax returns in assessing compensation for personal injury cases, as well as the need to accurately evaluate the impact of permanent disabilities on a claimant's future earnings and quality of life.

Date of Decision: September 26, 2023

Gurmukh Singh vs Santokh Singh @ S.S.Grover and others

Latest Legal News