Conversion for Reservation Benefits Is a Fraud on the Constitution: Supreme Court Rejects SC Certificate for Reconverted Christian Patent Office Guidelines Must Be Followed for Consistency in Decisions: Madras High Court Limitation Cannot Obstruct Justice When Parties Consent to Extensions: Madhya Pradesh High Court Additional Fees Are Incentives, Not Penalties: Orissa High Court Upholds Central Motor Vehicles Rules Amendment Interpretation of Tender Eligibility Criteria Lies with Tendering Authority: Gujrat High Court Upholds Discharge of Tender Complaints Were Contradictory and Did Not Establish Prima Facie Case for SC/ST Act Charges: J&K HC Insurance Cover Notes Hold Policy Validity Unless Proven Otherwise: Kerala High Court Upholds Compensation in Fatal Accident Case Article 21 Of Constitution Applies Irrespective Of Nature Of Crime. Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Amounts To Punishment Without Adjudication: Calcutta HC Concept Of 'Liberal Approach' Cannot Be Used To Jettison The Substantive Law Of Limitation: Delhi High Court Limitation is Not Always a Mixed Question of Fact and Law: Bombay High Court Dismisses 31-Year-Old Specific Performance Suit as Time-Barred Intent Coupled with Trespass Constitutes Full Offence: Supreme Court Mere Possession of Bribe Money Insufficient Without Proof of Demand and Acceptance: Supreme Court Right to Promotion is Not a Fundamental Right; Retrospective Benefits Without Service Cannot Be Granted: Supreme Court of India Oral Gift Validity in Mohammedan Law: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Constructive Possession and Injunction Unauthorized Construction on Government Irrigation Land Must Be Demolished: Calcutta High Court Directs Sub-Divisional Officer High Court Upholds Dismissal of Petition Over Road Obstruction Due to Non-Prosecution Victim of Rape Has Right to Bodily Integrity and Reproductive Choice: Gujarat High Court Permits Termination of 24-Week Pregnancy

High Court Should Refrain From Entertaining Matters When Alternative Remedy Under SARFAESI Act Is Available: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India in the case of PHR Invent Educational Society v. UCO Bank & Others, delivered on April 10, 2024, observed that High Courts should refrain from entertaining writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution when an efficacious alternative remedy under the SARFAESI Act is available, except in specific exceptional circumstances.

The judgment hinged on the legal question of the High Court’s jurisdiction in entertaining writ petitions against orders passed under the SARFAESI Act, particularly when statutory alternative remedies are available.

The appellant, PHR Invent Educational Society, appealed against the High Court’s order, which had set aside the Debts Recovery Tribunal’s (DRT) dismissal of the borrower’s application for restoration of a Securitization Application post-auction of mortgaged properties. The primary issue was whether the High Court was justified in entertaining the writ petition despite an alternative remedy being available under the SARFAESI Act.

Alternative Remedy and High Court’s Jurisdiction: The Court observed that the High Court erred in entertaining the writ petition when an alternative remedy was available under the SARFAESI Act. It emphasized that the High Courts should not interfere in such matters, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in the Chhabil Dass Agarwal case.

Validity of Auction Purchase and Borrower’s Conduct: The Court noted that the auction sale, once confirmed, should only be interfered with in cases of fraud or collusion, which was not present in this case. The Court also highlighted the borrower’s failure to comply with the DRT’s order, which had a direct impact on the outcome.

Exercise of Jurisdiction under Article 226: The Supreme Court reiterated its stance that petitions under Article 226 should not be entertained in the presence of an effective alternative remedy, except in exceptional circumstances, which were not found in this case.

Decision: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court’s order dated February 4, 2022, in Writ Petition No. 5275 of 2021, and dismissing the writ petition with costs imposed upon the borrower.

Date of Decision: April 10, 2024

PHR Invent Educational Society v. UCO Bank & Others

 

Similar News