UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

High Court Sets Aside Impugned Order, Condoning Delay in Filing Form 10: Mere Failure to Claim Accumulation Cannot Be Read as Intent Not to File

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has overturned the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), granting relief to the Bar Council of India by condoning the delay in filing Form 10 for the Assessment Year 2016-17.

The bench, comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Girish Kathpalia, delivered the judgment on January 5, 2024, after reserving their decision on December 13, 2023. The case revolved around the Bar Council of India’s plea for the quashing of an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) and for directions to accept Form No.10 with the condoned delay.

In their observations, the Court noted, “Mere failure to claim accumulation cannot be read as reasons to believe that the petitioner did not intend to file Form 10.” This statement was pivotal in the Court’s decision to set aside the impugned order, emphasizing the lack of sufficient grounds to assume a lack of intent to comply with the filing requirements.

The case highlighted the inadvertent oversight by the officials of the Bar Council of India, who failed to notice the amendments in the Income Tax Act and the corresponding rules. This led to a delay in filing Form 10, which the Court found to be a reasonable cause for the delay. The Court also drew parallels with similar condonations granted for the Assessment Years 2017-18 and 2018-19, reinforcing the principle of mitigating genuine hardships.

Date of Decision: January 05, 2024

BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION)

 

Latest Legal News