Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

High Court Sets Aside Impugned Order, Condoning Delay in Filing Form 10: Mere Failure to Claim Accumulation Cannot Be Read as Intent Not to File

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has overturned the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), granting relief to the Bar Council of India by condoning the delay in filing Form 10 for the Assessment Year 2016-17.

The bench, comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Girish Kathpalia, delivered the judgment on January 5, 2024, after reserving their decision on December 13, 2023. The case revolved around the Bar Council of India’s plea for the quashing of an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) and for directions to accept Form No.10 with the condoned delay.

In their observations, the Court noted, “Mere failure to claim accumulation cannot be read as reasons to believe that the petitioner did not intend to file Form 10.” This statement was pivotal in the Court’s decision to set aside the impugned order, emphasizing the lack of sufficient grounds to assume a lack of intent to comply with the filing requirements.

The case highlighted the inadvertent oversight by the officials of the Bar Council of India, who failed to notice the amendments in the Income Tax Act and the corresponding rules. This led to a delay in filing Form 10, which the Court found to be a reasonable cause for the delay. The Court also drew parallels with similar condonations granted for the Assessment Years 2017-18 and 2018-19, reinforcing the principle of mitigating genuine hardships.

Date of Decision: January 05, 2024

BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION)

 

Latest Legal News