Even 1.5 Years in Jail Doesn’t Dilute Section 37 NDPS Rigour: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in 710 Kg Poppy Husk Case Stay of Conviction Nullifies Disqualification Under Section 8(3) RP Act: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Against Rahul Gandhi Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Uncover ₹2 Crore MGNREGA Scam: Kerala High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail for Vendors in Corruption Case Order 41 Rule 23 CPC | Trial Court Cannot Decide Title Solely on a Vacated Judgment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes By Bar Associations Cannot Stall Justice: Allahabad High Court Holds Office Bearers Liable for Contempt if Revenue Suits Are Delayed Due to Boycotts To Constitute a Service PE, Services Must Be Furnished Within India Through Employees Present in India: Delhi High Court Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation Waiver of Right Under Section 50 NDPS is Valid Even Without Panch Signatures: Bombay High Court Agricultural Land Is 'Property' Under Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937: A.P. High Court Tenant Who Pays Rent After Verifying Landlord’s Will Cannot Dispute His Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Eviction Challenge by HP State Cooperative Bank Clever Drafting Cannot Override Limitation Bar: Gujarat High Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance Once Divorce by Mutual Consent Is Final, Wife Cannot Pursue Criminal Case for Stridhan Without Reserving Right to Do So: Himachal Pradesh High Court Caste-Based Insults Must Show Intent – Mere Abuse Not Enough for Atrocities Act: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Represent to Detaining Authority Vitiates NSA Detention: Gauhati High Court Awarding Further Interest On Penal Charges Is Contrary To Fundamental Policy Of Indian Arbitration Law: Bombay High Court

High Court Sets Aside Impugned Order, Condoning Delay in Filing Form 10: Mere Failure to Claim Accumulation Cannot Be Read as Intent Not to File

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has overturned the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), granting relief to the Bar Council of India by condoning the delay in filing Form 10 for the Assessment Year 2016-17.

The bench, comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Girish Kathpalia, delivered the judgment on January 5, 2024, after reserving their decision on December 13, 2023. The case revolved around the Bar Council of India’s plea for the quashing of an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) and for directions to accept Form No.10 with the condoned delay.

In their observations, the Court noted, “Mere failure to claim accumulation cannot be read as reasons to believe that the petitioner did not intend to file Form 10.” This statement was pivotal in the Court’s decision to set aside the impugned order, emphasizing the lack of sufficient grounds to assume a lack of intent to comply with the filing requirements.

The case highlighted the inadvertent oversight by the officials of the Bar Council of India, who failed to notice the amendments in the Income Tax Act and the corresponding rules. This led to a delay in filing Form 10, which the Court found to be a reasonable cause for the delay. The Court also drew parallels with similar condonations granted for the Assessment Years 2017-18 and 2018-19, reinforcing the principle of mitigating genuine hardships.

Date of Decision: January 05, 2024

BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION)

 

Latest Legal News