Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

High Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Juvenile Appeal on Technical Grounds

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has set aside the dismissal of an appeal filed by a juvenile petitioner on the grounds of being time-barred. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Karamjit Singh, presiding over the case, emphasized the court's duty to impart justice and directed the matter to be reconsidered on its merits without insisting on technicalities.

The petitioner, Mohd. Israr, a child in conflict with the law, had challenged the order of the Principal Magistrate of the Juvenile Justice Board, which erroneously treated him as an adult. The appeal against this order was dismissed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge solely based on the limitation period for filing the appeal. However, the petitioner's counsel argued that the petitioner, being a minor, lacked knowledge of legal technicalities and requested the court to condone the delay in filing the appeal.

Justice Karamjit Singh, in his judgment, expressed disappointment over the dismissal of the appeal and stated, "It is the duty of the Court to impart justice...the Court should have decided the matter in question on merits without going into hyper technical ground of limitation, while keeping in mind the fact that the petitioner is a juvenile." The State counsel also concurred with the petitioner's contention, acknowledging that the appeal should have been decided on its merits rather than on technical grounds.

Consequently, the High Court allowed the petition, setting aside the dismissal order and remanding the matter back to the Court of Additional Sessions Judge for fresh consideration on its merits. The court directed both parties to appear before the concerned court on July 4, 2023.

This landmark decision reinforces the principle that the court's primary responsibility is to ensure justice is served, particularly in cases involving juveniles. The judgment highlights the importance of considering the unique circumstances and limitations faced by minors in the legal process, advocating a more compassionate and holistic approach towards the administration of justice.

Date of Decision: 02.06.2023

Mohd. Israr  vs State of Haryana

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Mohd.-Israr-vs-State-PH-HC-02-June-23.pdf"]

Latest Legal News