Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Use of ‘Absconding’ in Employment Context Not Defamatory Per Se, But A Privileged Communication Under Exception 7 of Section 499 IPC: Allahabad High Court Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case

High Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Juvenile Appeal on Technical Grounds

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has set aside the dismissal of an appeal filed by a juvenile petitioner on the grounds of being time-barred. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Karamjit Singh, presiding over the case, emphasized the court's duty to impart justice and directed the matter to be reconsidered on its merits without insisting on technicalities.

The petitioner, Mohd. Israr, a child in conflict with the law, had challenged the order of the Principal Magistrate of the Juvenile Justice Board, which erroneously treated him as an adult. The appeal against this order was dismissed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge solely based on the limitation period for filing the appeal. However, the petitioner's counsel argued that the petitioner, being a minor, lacked knowledge of legal technicalities and requested the court to condone the delay in filing the appeal.

Justice Karamjit Singh, in his judgment, expressed disappointment over the dismissal of the appeal and stated, "It is the duty of the Court to impart justice...the Court should have decided the matter in question on merits without going into hyper technical ground of limitation, while keeping in mind the fact that the petitioner is a juvenile." The State counsel also concurred with the petitioner's contention, acknowledging that the appeal should have been decided on its merits rather than on technical grounds.

Consequently, the High Court allowed the petition, setting aside the dismissal order and remanding the matter back to the Court of Additional Sessions Judge for fresh consideration on its merits. The court directed both parties to appear before the concerned court on July 4, 2023.

This landmark decision reinforces the principle that the court's primary responsibility is to ensure justice is served, particularly in cases involving juveniles. The judgment highlights the importance of considering the unique circumstances and limitations faced by minors in the legal process, advocating a more compassionate and holistic approach towards the administration of justice.

Date of Decision: 02.06.2023

Mohd. Israr  vs State of Haryana

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Mohd.-Israr-vs-State-PH-HC-02-June-23.pdf"]

Latest Legal News