Writ Jurisdiction Not Appropriate For Adjudicating Complex Title Disputes; Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Ownership: Madhya Pradesh High Court Joint Account Holder Not Liable Under Section 138 NI Act If Not A Signatory To Dishonoured Cheque: Allahabad High Court Private Individuals Accepting Money Can Be Prosecuted Under MPID Act; Nomenclature As 'Loan' Irrelevant: Supreme Court Nomenclature Of Transaction As 'Loan' Irrelevant; If Ingredients Met, It Is A 'Deposit' Under MPID Act: Supreme Court Pleadings Must State Material Facts, Not Evidence; Deficiency In Pleading Cannot Be Raised For First Time In Appeal: Supreme Court Denial Of Remission Cannot Rest Solely On Heinousness Of Crime; Justice Doesn't Permit Permanent Incarceration In Shadow Of Worst Act: Supreme Court Second Application For Rejection Of Plaint Barred By Res Judicata If Earlier Order Attained Finality: Supreme Court Section 6(5) Hindu Succession Act Is A Saving Clause, Not A Jurisdictional Bar To Partition Suits: Supreme Court Sale Of Natural Gas Via Common Carrier Pipelines Is An Inter-State Sale; UP Has No Jurisdiction To Levy VAT: Supreme Court Mediclaim Reimbursement Not Deductible From Motor Accident Compensation; Tortfeasor Can’t Benefit From Claimant’s Prudence: Supreme Court Rules Of Procedure Are Handmaid Of Justice, Not Mistress; Striking Off Defence Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Not Mechanical: Supreme Court Power To Strike Off Tenant's Defense Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Discretionary, Not To Be Exercised Mechanically: Supreme Court Areas Urbanised Before 1959 Don't Require Separate Notification To Fall Under Delhi Rent Control Act: Delhi High Court Police Cannot Freeze Bank Accounts To Perform Compensatory Justice; Direct Nexus With Offence Essential: Bombay High Court FSL Probe Before Electronic Evidence Meets Section 65B Admissibility Standards: Gujarat High Court Court Shouldn't Adjudicate Rights At Stage Of Granting Leave Under Section 92 CPC, Only Prima Facie Case Required: Allahabad High Court Right To Seek Bail Based On Non-Furnishing Of 'Grounds Of Arrest' Applies Only Prospectively From November 6, 2025: Madras High Court Prior Exposure To Accused Before TIP Renders Identification Meaningless: Delhi High Court Acquits Four In Uphaar Cinema Murder Case No Particular Format Prescribed For 'Proposed Resolution' In No-Confidence Motion; Intention Of Members To Be Gathered From Document As A Whole: Orissa High Court Trial Court Cannot Grant Temporary Injunction Without Adverting To Allegations Of Fraud And Collusion: Calcutta High Court "Ganja" Definition Under NDPS Act Excludes Roots & Stems: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail As Seized Weight Included Whole Plants Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Doesn't Displace Section 37 NDPS Mandate In Commercial Quantity Cases: Orissa High Court

High Court Refused to Quash FIR - Principal's Failure to Report Harassment Leads to Student Suicide

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, 14th July 2023: In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld the liability of a school Principal under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2022 (POCSO Act), after a young student's suicide. The court dismissed the petition seeking the quashing of the FIR and other proceedings against the petitioner, the Principal of Delhi Public School, Greater Faridabad.

In the judgment delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Harnaresh Singh Gill, the court observed, "The POCSO Act was enacted with the sole object of proper development of the child and to ensure that his or her right to privacy and confidentiality be protected and respected by every person through all stages of a judicial process involving the child."

The tragic incident involved a young student from Class X-B, who took his own life allegedly due to harassment, bullying, and torture by his classmates at the school. The petitioner, being the overall incharge of the school, was informed of the alleged incidents but failed to report the matter to the police as required under the POCSO Act.

The court highlighted the obligation of all concerned individuals, including the school principal, to report any apprehension or knowledge of an offense under the Act to the police. It was emphasized that the petitioner's attempts to resolve the issue internally did not absolve her from the legal duty to report such incidents immediately.

Justice Gill stated, "The occurrence in question preceded the alleged homophobic and transphobic bullying by the peers of the deceased child. The email was sent by the complainant to the petitioner on 23.09.2021, and due to the inaction on the part of the petitioner, the child committed suicide on 24.02.2022."

The court further clarified that its observations were only for the purpose of the present petition and directed the trial court to proceed with the matter impartially, considering the evidence on record.

 Date of Decision: 14th July 2023

Surjeet Khanna vs State of Haryana and another 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Surjeet_Khanna_vs_State_Of_Haryana_And_Another_on_14_July_2023_PHHC.pdf"]        

Latest Legal News