Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

High Court Quashes Externment Order: Single Incident Insufficient to Label Individual as 'Goonda', Rules Allh. HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, under the bench of Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, J., quashed an externment order issued against petitioner Guddu Chauhan, declaring that a single incident is insufficient to label an individual as a 'goonda' under the U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970.

In the case of Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 7436 of 2023, the petitioner, represented by advocates Zeeshan Mazhar and Abhishek Chandra, had challenged the legality of an order passed by the Commissioner Vindhyachal Division and Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue), Bhadohi. The order, dated 22nd June 2020, had directed the petitioner's externment from District Bhadohi for six months, based on allegations of being a habitual offender and a danger to the community.

The Court, in its judgment, highlighted the legal definition of a 'goonda' as provided in Section 2(b) of the Goondas Act. It was observed that Clause (i) of Section 2(b) necessitates at least two incidents of commission of crime to treat an individual as a habitual offender. However, the notice issued to the petitioner referred to a single extreme instance, which fell short of the legal requirement.

The Court held, "Since in this case against the petitioner there is reference of one extreme instance only, the petitioner could not be deemed to be a habitual offender on the basis of that single incident only, so the notice falls short of legal requirement as provided in Clause (i) of Section 2(b) of the 1970 Act."

Emphasizing the importance of multiple incidents to invoke the penal provisions of the Act, the Court stated, "The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Vijay Narain Singh versus State of Bihar and others (1984) 3 SCC 14 has been pleased to hold that it is essential to refer to at least two incidents of commission of crime for applicability of Clause (i) of Section 2(b) of the Act."

In light of this legal interpretation, the Court allowed the writ petition, thereby quashing the impugned order dated 22nd June 2020 and the appellate court order dated 31st March 2022. The Court further directed that a copy of the order be forwarded to the District Magistrate, Bhadohi, for necessary actions.

Date of Decision: 27th July 2023

Guddu Chauhan vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others

Latest Legal News