Contradictions In Eyewitness Accounts And Suppression Of Crucial Evidence Weaken The Prosecution's Case: Telangana High Court High Court of Sikkim Sets Aside Trial Court’s Decision on Maintainability of Suit: Preliminary Issues Must Be Purely of Law Courts Must Focus on Substance Over Procedure, Says High Court Writ Petitions Against Civil Court Orders Must Be Under Article 227: Patna High Court Reiterates Jurisdictional Boundaries Kerala High Court Upholds Eviction, Rejects Sub-Tenant's Kudikidappu Claim Contractual Employment Does Not Confer Right to Regularization: Jharkhand High Court Divorced Wife Entitled to Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act for Past Domestic Violence: Bombay High Court Tenants Cannot Prescribe How Landlords Utilize Their Property: Delhi High Court Validates Eviction Labour Commissioner to Decide Petitioner’s Date of Birth Claim within Three Months, Ensuring Proper Verification and Consideration of Evidence: Uttarakhand High Court Concealment of Health Condition and False Allegations Amount to Cruelty: Gujarat High Court Upholds Divorce Decree Possession Implies Constructive Notice: Duty to Inquire Rests on Subsequent Purchasers: Supreme Court Clarifies Bona Fide Purchase Standards Judicial Proceedings Cannot Be Instituted After Four Years: MP High Court in Quashing FIR Against Retired Engineer Orissa High Court Invalidates Lecturer Recruitment Advertisements for Non-Compliance with UGC Standards Public Interest Jurisdiction Not a Substitute for Private Litigation: Karnataka High Court Declines PIL Cognizance under Section 188 IPC is illegal without a public servant’s complaint:Kerala High Court Juvenile Justice Act Prevails Over Recruitment Rules: Madras High Court Rules Juvenile Records Cannot Bar Employment in Police Services" Calcutta High Court Quashes MR Distributorship Selection Due to Irregularities in Godown Compliance and Selection Process Once the driver has established the validity of his license, the insurer cannot escape liability without conclusive proof to the contrary: J&K HC Belated Claims Cannot Be Entertained: Kerala High Court Overturns CAT Decision on Date of Birth Correction DNA Tests Cannot Supersede Established Legal Presumptions: Himachal Pradesh HC Section 26E of SARFAESI Act Overrides VAT Act: Secured Creditor's Charge Has Priority Over State's Tax Dues: Gujrat High Court High Court of Delhi Clarifies Jurisdiction in Commercial Dispute: 'Procedural Efficiency Must Be Upheld Power Under Section 319 CrPC Cannot Be Exercised Without Prima Facie Case Beyond Contradictions: Supreme Court Motive Alone Insufficient for Conviction Without Corroboration: Supreme Court Supreme Court Ensures Equal Financial Benefits for All High Court Judges: Discrimination Based on Recruitment Source Struck Down Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Four Accused: Cites Contradictory Dying Declarations and Lack of Independent Evidence in Murder Case Evidence Corroborates Violent Robbery and Recovery of Stolen Articles: Calcutta High Court Upholds Conviction in Burrabazar Dacoity Case Failure to Implead Contesting Candidates is Fatal; Fundamental Defect Cannot Be Cured: Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Magistrate Not Functus Officio Post-Final Order in Maintenance Cases: Allahabad High Court Substantial Questions of Law a Must in Second Appeals, Reiterates Andhra Pradesh High Court Inconsistencies and Procedural Lapses: Allahabad High Court Acquits Four in Neeta Singh Murder Case Non-Registration of Tenancy Invites Eviction, Dual Ownership No Bar to Landlord's Rights: Madras High Court Pension Must Reflect Retrospective Pay Revision: Kerala HC Directs Revised Payout within Four Weeks Regularization Issue Must Be Resolved by Industrial Tribunal: Karnataka High Court puts recruitment on hold for a month, calls for review of contract workers’ status Reliance on Hostile Witnesses and Lack of Forensic Evidence Cannot Sustain Conviction: J&K High Court Acquits Accused in Assault Case" Injunction Suit Valid Without Title Declaration When Plaintiff's Possession Is Clear: Orissa High Court Pretrial Detention Cannot Amount to Pre-Conviction Punishment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail in Attempted Murder Case Concessions/Statements by Counsel Cannot Be Disowned By Party on Claims of Misunderstanding: Delhi High Court Rules Against SAI Bank Officers Must Adhere to ‘Higher Standards of Honesty and Integrity: Jharkhand High Court in Upholding Dismissal for Misappropriation Strict Proof of Marriage Not Mandatory for Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC: Calcutta High Court High Court Upholds Seniority Rights of Contractual Junior Engineers NDPS | Three Years Without Trial Progress Cannot Justify Continued Incarceration: Bombay High Court Grants Bail Integrity is Non-Negotiable in Judicial Service: Allahabad High Court Affirms Termination for Concealed Criminal Case Court Must Presume Offence at Charge-Framing Stage, Not Assess Likelihood of Conviction: Madhya Pradesh High Court

High Court Oversteps in Re-assessing Scrutiny Committee’s Findings on Caste Certificate: SC Restores Validation Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has allowed the appeals challenging the High Court’s decision that had overturned the validation of the appellant’s caste certificate. The apex court emphasized the limits of the High Court’s intervention in the findings of the Scrutiny Committee.

 

The primary legal issue revolved around the validity of a caste certificate (‘Mochi – Scheduled Caste’ in Maharashtra) and the extent of judicial review over the Scrutiny Committee’s decision. The Supreme Court assessed whether the High Court exceeded its writ of certiorari powers in reassessing the findings of the Scrutiny Committee.

 

Navneet Kaur, the appellant, contested the 2019 Parliamentary election from Amravati constituency as a ‘Scheduled Caste’ candidate. Her caste certificate was challenged as fraudulent. The Scrutiny Committee validated her caste claim, which was later set aside by the High Court. The High Court’s judgment was based on allegations of forged documents and overstepping of the Presidential Order.

 

Caste Certificate Validation: The Supreme Court found the Scrutiny Committee’s validation based on pre-independence era documents appropriate. The High Court’s reevaluation was deemed excessive, as the Scrutiny Committee’s process adhered to proper procedures.

 

High Court’s Scope in Writ of Certiorari: The apex court opined that the High Court overstepped its bounds by re-evaluating evidence within the exclusive domain of the Scrutiny Committee.

 

Scrutiny Committee’s Procedure and Authority: The Supreme Court upheld the Scrutiny Committee’s process and its subjective satisfaction in validating the appellant’s claim.

 

Presidential Order’s Ambit: The Court clarified that the validation of the appellant’s caste claim as ‘Mochi’ does not amend or misinterpret the Presidential Order.

 

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, restoring the Scrutiny Committee’s validation order and setting aside the High Court judgment. No order as to costs was given.

Date of Decision: 4th April 2024

Navneet Kaur Harbhajansing Kundles vs. State of Maharashtra and Others 

Similar News