Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

High Court Oversteps in Re-assessing Scrutiny Committee’s Findings on Caste Certificate: SC Restores Validation Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has allowed the appeals challenging the High Court’s decision that had overturned the validation of the appellant’s caste certificate. The apex court emphasized the limits of the High Court’s intervention in the findings of the Scrutiny Committee.

 

The primary legal issue revolved around the validity of a caste certificate (‘Mochi – Scheduled Caste’ in Maharashtra) and the extent of judicial review over the Scrutiny Committee’s decision. The Supreme Court assessed whether the High Court exceeded its writ of certiorari powers in reassessing the findings of the Scrutiny Committee.

 

Navneet Kaur, the appellant, contested the 2019 Parliamentary election from Amravati constituency as a ‘Scheduled Caste’ candidate. Her caste certificate was challenged as fraudulent. The Scrutiny Committee validated her caste claim, which was later set aside by the High Court. The High Court’s judgment was based on allegations of forged documents and overstepping of the Presidential Order.

 

Caste Certificate Validation: The Supreme Court found the Scrutiny Committee’s validation based on pre-independence era documents appropriate. The High Court’s reevaluation was deemed excessive, as the Scrutiny Committee’s process adhered to proper procedures.

 

High Court’s Scope in Writ of Certiorari: The apex court opined that the High Court overstepped its bounds by re-evaluating evidence within the exclusive domain of the Scrutiny Committee.

 

Scrutiny Committee’s Procedure and Authority: The Supreme Court upheld the Scrutiny Committee’s process and its subjective satisfaction in validating the appellant’s claim.

 

Presidential Order’s Ambit: The Court clarified that the validation of the appellant’s caste claim as ‘Mochi’ does not amend or misinterpret the Presidential Order.

 

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, restoring the Scrutiny Committee’s validation order and setting aside the High Court judgment. No order as to costs was given.

Date of Decision: 4th April 2024

Navneet Kaur Harbhajansing Kundles vs. State of Maharashtra and Others 

Latest Legal News