"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

High Court Oversteps in Re-assessing Scrutiny Committee’s Findings on Caste Certificate: SC Restores Validation Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has allowed the appeals challenging the High Court’s decision that had overturned the validation of the appellant’s caste certificate. The apex court emphasized the limits of the High Court’s intervention in the findings of the Scrutiny Committee.

 

The primary legal issue revolved around the validity of a caste certificate (‘Mochi – Scheduled Caste’ in Maharashtra) and the extent of judicial review over the Scrutiny Committee’s decision. The Supreme Court assessed whether the High Court exceeded its writ of certiorari powers in reassessing the findings of the Scrutiny Committee.

 

Navneet Kaur, the appellant, contested the 2019 Parliamentary election from Amravati constituency as a ‘Scheduled Caste’ candidate. Her caste certificate was challenged as fraudulent. The Scrutiny Committee validated her caste claim, which was later set aside by the High Court. The High Court’s judgment was based on allegations of forged documents and overstepping of the Presidential Order.

 

Caste Certificate Validation: The Supreme Court found the Scrutiny Committee’s validation based on pre-independence era documents appropriate. The High Court’s reevaluation was deemed excessive, as the Scrutiny Committee’s process adhered to proper procedures.

 

High Court’s Scope in Writ of Certiorari: The apex court opined that the High Court overstepped its bounds by re-evaluating evidence within the exclusive domain of the Scrutiny Committee.

 

Scrutiny Committee’s Procedure and Authority: The Supreme Court upheld the Scrutiny Committee’s process and its subjective satisfaction in validating the appellant’s claim.

 

Presidential Order’s Ambit: The Court clarified that the validation of the appellant’s caste claim as ‘Mochi’ does not amend or misinterpret the Presidential Order.

 

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, restoring the Scrutiny Committee’s validation order and setting aside the High Court judgment. No order as to costs was given.

Date of Decision: 4th April 2024

Navneet Kaur Harbhajansing Kundles vs. State of Maharashtra and Others 

Similar News