Conviction Under Section 409 IPC Postulates Strict Proof Of Entrustment; Suspicion However Grave Cannot Substitute Proof: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Emanating From Past Matrimonial Relationship Ought Not To Linger After Divorce: Supreme Court Negligence Of Previous Counsel Not A Ground To Reopen Concluded Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell Cannot Protect Tenant's Possession Under Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Registered Sale Deeds Admissible As Secondary Evidence Without Proving Loss Of Original: Gauhati High Court Counsel Representing Deceased Party Must Inform Court Of Death Under Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC: J&K High Court Son Staying In Father's House Out Of Love And Affection Is A Mere Licensee, Cannot Challenge Father's Title: Delhi High Court Conviction For Murder Cannot Stand Where Single Blow Inflicted In Sudden Fight Without Premeditation: Uttarakhand High Court Inability To Trace Suppliers Or Buyers No Ground For Custodial Interrogation Once Recovery Is Effected: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Assemble Peacefully To Celebrate Association Anniversary Is A Fundamental Right; Unlawful Assembly Per Se Not An Offence: Madras High Court Marriage Photographs Can Be Relied Upon To Estimate Quantity Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes: Kerala High Court POCSO Act Not Confined To Securing Convictions, Soul Of Law Lies In Preserving Childhood Dignity & Healing: Madras High Court Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reverses Acquittal in POCSO Case, Criticizes Erroneous and Insensible Lower Court Judgment

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment on December 18, 2023, the High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Bench, presided over by Justice Hanchate Sanjeevkumar, overturned an acquittal granted by the POCSO Court, Ballari, in Special Case No.684/2018. The case involved allegations of sexual assault on a minor, with the accused charged under several sections of the IPC and the POCSO Act.

Justice Sanjeevkumar, in his detailed judgment, heavily criticized the approach of the lower court, describing it as “completely erroneous, perverse and inhuman.” The judgment underscored the need for sensitive handling of cases involving minors, especially in the context of sexual offenses. The High Court found that the POCSO Court had failed to appreciate the evidence in its proper perspective, leading to an unjustifiable acquittal.

The case’s facts revealed that the accused was charged with sexually assaulting an 8 and ½-year-old child. The High Court, after reassessing the evidence, found the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses, including the victim and her family, credible despite minor discrepancies. Consequently, the accused was convicted for offenses under Sections 354A and 354B of the IPC and Sections 7, 8, 9, and 10 of the POCSO Act.

In a stinging observation, Justice Sanjeevkumar noted that the POCSO Court judge showed a lack of sensitivity and professionalism in handling the case. He recommended that the judge undergo training at the Karnataka Judicial Academy to better handle such sensitive cases in the future.

The High Court’s judgment also directed the District Legal Services Authority to pay compensation of Rs. 5,00,000 to the minor victim under the Karnataka Victim Compensation Scheme. In addition to reversing the acquittal, the court imposed rigorous imprisonment and fines under the relevant sections of the IPC and POCSO Act.

Date of Decision: 18th December 2023

STATE OF KARNATAKA VS VENKATESH @ VENKAPPA

 

Latest Legal News