Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court Title And Ownership Irrelevant In Suit Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; Plaint Liable To Be Rejected If Filed Beyond Six Months: Delhi High Court Receipt Of Pension By Widow Can Be Considered To Determine 'Just Compensation' But Not To Deprive Claimants Of Award: Calcutta High Court FSL Report Lacking Scientific Criteria And Data Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Allahabad High Court Issues Directives For Testing Viscera Standard Of Proof In Railway Accident Claims Is Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Gujarat High Court No Second Statutory Appeal Lies Against Conviction By Appellate Court Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is Sole Remedy: Supreme Court Wives' Property Is Their Own, Not Husband's: Supreme Court REJECTS High Court's Succession Formula; Restores Clarity For Christian Inheritance

High Court of Karnataka Reverses Acquittal in POCSO Case, Criticizes Erroneous and Insensible Lower Court Judgment

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment on December 18, 2023, the High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Bench, presided over by Justice Hanchate Sanjeevkumar, overturned an acquittal granted by the POCSO Court, Ballari, in Special Case No.684/2018. The case involved allegations of sexual assault on a minor, with the accused charged under several sections of the IPC and the POCSO Act.

Justice Sanjeevkumar, in his detailed judgment, heavily criticized the approach of the lower court, describing it as “completely erroneous, perverse and inhuman.” The judgment underscored the need for sensitive handling of cases involving minors, especially in the context of sexual offenses. The High Court found that the POCSO Court had failed to appreciate the evidence in its proper perspective, leading to an unjustifiable acquittal.

The case’s facts revealed that the accused was charged with sexually assaulting an 8 and ½-year-old child. The High Court, after reassessing the evidence, found the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses, including the victim and her family, credible despite minor discrepancies. Consequently, the accused was convicted for offenses under Sections 354A and 354B of the IPC and Sections 7, 8, 9, and 10 of the POCSO Act.

In a stinging observation, Justice Sanjeevkumar noted that the POCSO Court judge showed a lack of sensitivity and professionalism in handling the case. He recommended that the judge undergo training at the Karnataka Judicial Academy to better handle such sensitive cases in the future.

The High Court’s judgment also directed the District Legal Services Authority to pay compensation of Rs. 5,00,000 to the minor victim under the Karnataka Victim Compensation Scheme. In addition to reversing the acquittal, the court imposed rigorous imprisonment and fines under the relevant sections of the IPC and POCSO Act.

Date of Decision: 18th December 2023

STATE OF KARNATAKA VS VENKATESH @ VENKAPPA

 

Latest Legal News