Accused Not Entitled To Copies Of 'Unrelied' Upon Documents At The Stage Of Framing Of Charges Under Section 91 CrPC: Supreme Court Elected Representatives Have No Privilege To Resort To Violence; Criminal Antecedents Are Material For Bail Adjudication: Supreme Court Mere Absence Of Transport Documents Does Not Create A Presumption Of Violation Of Chhattisgarh Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act, 2004: Supreme Court Section 396 IPC | Conviction For 'Dacoity With Murder' Requires Proof That Murder Was Committed In The Course Of Dacoity: Allahabad High Court 'Developers Cannot Delay Conveyance For Eternity And Milk Additional FSI Benefits': Bombay High Court Upholds Societies' Deemed Conveyance Pre-Approval Statutory Dues Stand Extinguished Upon Approval Of Resolution Plan; GST Authorities Cannot Initiate Fresh Proceedings: Calcutta High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell With Delivery Of Possession Is Admissible In A Suit For Specific Performance: Delhi High Court Stigmatic Order Discharging Probationer Without Inquiry Is Void For Violation Of Natural Justice: Gujarat High Court Execution Proceedings | Court Cannot Impose Arbitrary Financial Conditions Without Reason In Stay Applications: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 528 BNSS | High Court Cannot Exercise Inherent Powers To Circumvent Statutory Bar Against Second Revision: Delhi High Court Advocate Empanelment | Restriction On Multiple Applications Is A Procedural Choice Within Employer’s Domain: Delhi High Court Acquittal Appeal | Double Presumption Of Innocence In Favour Of Accused Cannot Be Disturbed Merely Because Another View Is Possible: Gujarat High Court SC/ST Act | Offence Under Section 3(1)(g) Not Attracted If Dispossession Or Interference Is Not Due To Victim's Caste: Himachal Pradesh High Court Judicial Officer Must Maintain Distance From Practicing Advocates To Avoid Impropriety: Gujarat High Court Upholds Dismissal Section 183 BNSS | Investigating Officer Cannot Independently Record Further Statement Of Victim After Recording Before Magistrate: Karnataka High Court Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award

High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Appeal for Dissolution of Marriage on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, recently delivered a judgment dismissing an appeal (FAO No. 437 of 2010) seeking the dissolution of a marriage on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. The case was heard by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya.

In the appeal, the husband, Nain Sukh, had filed a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking the dissolution of his marriage with the respondent, Seema Devi. However, the learned Additional District Judge, Shimla, had dismissed the petition.

The court observed that the allegations of cruelty made by the husband were vague and general, lacking specific instances to support the claim. Furthermore, the court noted that the husband had failed to comply with the rules requiring allegations of cruelty to be specified with sufficient particularity.

The burden of proof was on the petitioner, the husband, to establish the allegations of cruelty. However, the evidence presented by the husband and his witnesses was deemed insufficient by the court. On the other hand, the court found that the wife had a justifiable ground to live separately, as she alleged that the husband had married another woman and had children from that relationship. This allegation was supported by unchallenged evidence.

Additionally, the court held that the ground of desertion was not proved as it had not been specifically pleaded and the necessary jurisdictional facts were missing from the petition.

Based on these findings, the High Court dismissed the appeal, concluding that there was no merit in the husband's case.

Decided on : 02.06.2023

Nain Sukh vs Seema Devi 

Latest Legal News