Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Article 21-A Cannot Be Held Hostage to Transfer Preferences: Allahabad High Court Upholds Teacher Redeployment to Enforce Pupil–Teacher Ratio Arbitrator Cannot Rewrite Contract Or Travel Beyond Pleadings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes ₹5.18 Crore Award Director’ in GeM Clause 29 Does Not Mean ‘Independent Director’: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Technical Disqualification Section 25(3) Is Sacrosanct – Removal of a Trademark Cannot Rest on a Defective Notice: Delhi High Court Not Every Broken Promise Is Rape: Delhi High Court Draws Clear Line Between ‘Suspicion’ and ‘Grave Suspicion’ in False Promise to Marry Case Section 37 Is Not A Second Appeal On Merits: Delhi High Court Refuses To Re-Appreciate Evidence In Challenge To Arbitral Award Recovery After Retirement Is Clearly Impermissible: Bombay High Court Shields Retired Teacher From ₹2.80 Lakh Salary Recovery Paying Tax Does Not Legalise Illegality: Bombay High Court Refuses to Shield Alleged Unauthorized Structure Beneficial Pension Scheme Cannot Be Defeated By Cut-Off Dates: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs EPFO To Follow Sunil Kumar B. Guidelines On Higher Pension Claims Equity Aids the Vigilant, Not Those Who Sleep Over Their Rights: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses to Revive 36-Year-Old Pay Parity Claim Students Cannot Be Penalised For Legislative Invalidity: Supreme Court Protects Degrees Granted Before 2005 Yash Pal Verdict Restructuring Without Fulfilment of Conditions Cannot Defeat Insolvency: Supreme Court Reaffirms Default as the Sole Trigger Under Section 7 IBC Section 100-A CPC Slams The Door On Intra-Court Appeals In RERA Matters”: Allahabad High Court Declares Special Appeal Not Maintainable Mental Distance Between ‘May Be’ and ‘Must Be’ Is Long: Patna High Court Acquits Six in Murder Case Built on Broken Chain of Circumstances Where Corruption Takes Roots, Rule of Law Is Replaced by Rule of Transaction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to DIG Harcharan Singh Bhullar

High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Appeal for Dissolution of Marriage on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, recently delivered a judgment dismissing an appeal (FAO No. 437 of 2010) seeking the dissolution of a marriage on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. The case was heard by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya.

In the appeal, the husband, Nain Sukh, had filed a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking the dissolution of his marriage with the respondent, Seema Devi. However, the learned Additional District Judge, Shimla, had dismissed the petition.

The court observed that the allegations of cruelty made by the husband were vague and general, lacking specific instances to support the claim. Furthermore, the court noted that the husband had failed to comply with the rules requiring allegations of cruelty to be specified with sufficient particularity.

The burden of proof was on the petitioner, the husband, to establish the allegations of cruelty. However, the evidence presented by the husband and his witnesses was deemed insufficient by the court. On the other hand, the court found that the wife had a justifiable ground to live separately, as she alleged that the husband had married another woman and had children from that relationship. This allegation was supported by unchallenged evidence.

Additionally, the court held that the ground of desertion was not proved as it had not been specifically pleaded and the necessary jurisdictional facts were missing from the petition.

Based on these findings, the High Court dismissed the appeal, concluding that there was no merit in the husband's case.

Decided on : 02.06.2023

Nain Sukh vs Seema Devi 

Latest Legal News