Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case

High Court of Delhi Directs Maintenance of Status Quo on Sale of Disputed Property in Gurugram

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court disposed of an appeal by M/S One Qube Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Against the orders passed on 25.01.2024 and 15.12.2023, which directed the attachment and proposed sale of a disputed property in Gurugram, Haryana.

In the case titled EFA(OS) (COMM) 2/2024 and CM APPL. 5170/2024 & 5171/2024, the bench comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Bansal, while addressing the preliminary objection about the appeal’s maintainability, stated, “Till such time the application is not disposed of, the sale of the subject property will not be carried out.”

The property in question, described as Plot No.20, Urban Estate, Sector-18, Gurugram, has been at the center of a legal dispute following the orders for its attachment and the direction issued for its sale.

The appellant’s counsel argued that a sale deed dated 02.08.2017 had been executed in favor of the appellant, a point that could not be overlooked unless annulled in a manner known to law. The bench noted the uncertainty regarding a decision by the concerned Court in Gurugram on a similar application by the appellant. Mr. Arvind Nigam, representing the respondent, contended that a decision had been rendered, while the appellant’s counsel argued otherwise.

The High Court's decision came with specific directions. “The learned Single Judge will afford an opportunity to the contesting respondent, i.e., respondent No.1, to file a reply to the application preferred by the appellant,” the bench directed. Furthermore, the application will be listed for directions before the learned Single Judge on 05.02.2024.

The bench also Instructed the appellant to maintain the status quo concerning the sale of the subject property and to refrain from creating any long-term lease exceeding 30 years for the said property.

The matter is set to be examined on its merits, with all rights and contentions of the parties remaining open to be adjudicated by the learned Single Judge.

DECISION DATE : 30.01.2024

M/S ONE QUBE REALTORS PVT. LTD. VS DAIICHI SANKYO LIMITED & ORS.

Latest Legal News