Granting Bail Does Not Shield Foreign Nationals from Executive Action on Visa Violations: Delhi High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Misused to Resolve Substantive Disputes or Replace Execution Mechanisms: P&H High Court Eviction Proceedings Must Follow Principles of Natural Justice: Telangana High Court Quashes Eviction Order under Senior Citizens Act Limitation Law | Sufficient Cause Cannot Be Liberally Interpreted If Negligence or Inaction Is Apparent: Gujarat High Court Mere Pendency of Lease Renewal Requests Does Not Constitute Bona Fide Dispute: Calcutta High Court Upholds Eviction Proceedings Under Public Premises Act CGST | Declaratory Nature of Safari Retreats Ruling Mandates Reassessment of Input Tax Credit Claims: Kerala High Court Changing Rules of the Game Mid-Way Violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution: Rajasthan High Court Disapproval of a Relationship Does Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide Without Direct Instigation or Mens Rea: Supreme Court Limitation Period Under Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicle Act Cannot Defeat Victim’s Right to Compensation: Gujarat High Court Maintenance To Wife Cannot Be a Precondition for Bail: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Section 438 CrPC Court Cannot Rewrite Contract When Vendor Lacks Ownership of the Property: Calcutta High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance Royalty Can Be Levied on Minor Minerals Like Brick Earth, Irrespective of Land Ownership: Supreme Court Bail in Heinous Crimes Must Be Granted with Adequate Reasons and Judicial Scrutiny: Supreme Court Judicial Review in Disciplinary Cases Is Limited to Fairness, Not Reappreciation of Evidence: Supreme Court Prolonged Consensual Relationship Cannot Be Criminalized as Rape on False Promise of Marriage: Madras High Court No Interference in Judgments Without Perversity or Legal Error Under Section 100 CPC: Andhra Pradesh HC

High Court of Andhra Pradesh Sentences Officials to Jail for Contemptuous Disobedience of Court Orders - 'Equal Pay for Equal Work' Principle Upheld

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh delivered its verdict on Contempt Case No.2040 of 2023, punishing respondents for their willful disobedience of court orders. The judgement, delivered by HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO, sentenced the officials to jail and imposed fines for their failure to implement court orders dated 06.09.2022 and 22.12.2022.

The case pertained to the principle of 'equal pay for equal work,' which the court emphasized to be applicable to all employees, whether engaged on regular or temporary basis. The court opined that employees performing the same duties and responsibilities cannot be paid less based on their employment status.

The court noted in its judgement: "It is fallacious to determine artificial parameters to deny fruits of labour. An employee engaged for the same work cannot be paid less than another who performs the same duties and responsibilities."

Despite granting several adjournments, the respondents, represented by Sri V.R. Reddy Kovvuri and Sri Anup Koushik Karavadi, failed to comply with the court's orders, leading to the court's decision to hold them guilty of contempt of court.

The verdict found respondents No.2 and 3 guilty of contempt and sentenced them to one month of simple imprisonment. Additionally, a fine of Rs. 1,000 each was imposed on them. In default of payment of the fine, they will undergo one week of simple imprisonment. The court directed the respondents to surrender before the Registrar (Judicial) on or before 27.07.2023.

The judgement emphasized the importance of promptly complying with court orders, and the court highlighted that difficulties, if any, in implementing the orders should be brought before the court seeking an extension.

This ruling by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh reinforces the significance of adhering to court orders and upholds the principle of 'equal pay for equal work' as a fundamental right for all employees.

Date of Decision: 21 July 2023

Unknown vs Mr. Pradeep Yadav

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Unknown_vs_Mr_Pradeep_Yadav_on_21_July_2023_Andhra.pdf"]

Similar News