Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

High Court Grants Default Bail in NDPS Case Due to Incomplete Investigation: Violation of Section 36-A(4) of NDPS Act

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has granted default bail to a petitioner in a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act case. The court held that the investigation remained incomplete within the prescribed period, thus entitling the accused to default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.).

The Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul, while delivering the judgment on June 6, 2023, stated, “If on the expiry of the prescribed period of 180 days, investigation is still incomplete, an indefeasible right would accrue in favor of the accused under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C.”

The case revolved around the petitioner, Chander Prakash, who challenged the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sonipat. The petitioner argued that the challan had been presented without the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report within the stipulated period. As a result, the statutory period for completing the investigation had expired.

The court further emphasized that in NDPS Act cases, the FSL report is crucial as it helps determine the nature of the recovered substance. The absence of the FSL report rendered the challan incomplete, and the petitioner was entitled to default bail.

Highlighting the violation of Section 36-A(4) of the NDPS Act, the court noted, “The provisions of Section 36-A(4) of the NDPS Act insofar as the requirement of a report being made by the Public Prosecutor for an extension of time is concerned, are mandatory in nature.”

The judgment underlined the importance of the report from the Public Prosecutor for seeking an extension of time, which was not fulfilled in this case. The court found that the extension of time granted by the lower court lacked a report from the Public Prosecutor, rendering it invalid.

The court ordered the petitioner’s release on bail, clarifying that the judgment did not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

This ruling reaffirms the rights of the accused and underscores the necessity for strict compliance with procedural requirements, ensuring a fair and just legal process in NDPS Act cases.

Date of decision: 6th June, 2023

Chander Prakash vs State of Haryana

Latest Legal News