Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC

High Court Dismisses Petition in Electricity Theft Case, Directs Special Court to Expedite Trial: No Irregularity in Procedure

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, presided over by the Honorable Mr. Justice R. Sakthivel, dismissed a criminal original petition challenging the jurisdiction in an electricity theft case. The Court, in its judgment, directed the Special Court in Tuticorin to dispose of the matter expeditiously, setting a deadline of April 26, 2024.

The case, registered as Crl.O.P.(MD) No.22491 of 2018, involves the petitioner, Jeyaprakash, accused of stealing a substantial amount of electricity for his ice factory. The prosecution estimated the theft at 3,30,180 units of electricity, translating to a financial loss of Rs.33,84,345/- to TANGEDCO.

The petitioner sought to quash the proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, citing jurisdictional errors and arguing the applicability of Section 126 over Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003. However, the court found substantial merit in the prosecution’s argument, underscoring the petitioner’s previous similar offenses.

In his observation, Justice R. Sakthivel stated, “This Court does not find any irregularity by the Special Court in taking cognizance in the aforementioned manner.” He emphasized that the Special Court’s decision to proceed under Section 135 of the Electricity Act was justified, considering the evidence and the nature of the offense.

The defense’s claim of impossibility to use an agricultural connection for industrial purposes was also addressed. The Court carefully considered the submissions from both sides, including the detailed investigation report and the testimonies recorded.

 Date of Decision: 18/01/2024

Jeyaprakash VS State rep by Inspector of Police

 

Latest Legal News