Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

High Court Directs State Information Commission To Reconsider RTI Appeal And Must Give Specific Findings As Per Law

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh has directed the State Information Commission, Haryana, to reevaluate an appeal filed under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, emphasizing compliance with established legal principles. The decision comes in response to a writ petition filed by Arun Kumar Aggarwal, challenging the denial of information requested under the RTI Act.

"A perusal of the above judgment would show that the first appellate authority as well as the second appellate authority has to give specific findings in accordance with the five points, which have been formulated in the abovesaid judgment."

The petitioner had sought information on five specific points under the RTI Act. However, the State Information Commission's order dated 09.10.2023 was found to be inconsistent with the legal precedents set by the High Court in a previous case titled "Rajwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab and others" decided on 16.08.2023. In that case, the Court had emphasized the need for detailed, point-wise decisions on information requests, including reasons for non-disclosure if applicable.

"The impugned order dated 09.10.2023 has not been passed in compliance with the judgment passed by this Court in Rajwinder Singh’s case (supra) and thus, the said order deserves to be set aside."

As a result, the High Court partially allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order, directing the State Information Commission, Haryana, to reevaluate the petitioner's appeal expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of the receipt of the certified copy of the present order.

Date of Decision: 25.01.2024

Arun Kumar Aggarwal VS The State Information Commission

 

Latest Legal News