Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal

High Court Directs Continued Efforts in Tracing Missing Minor, Stresses on Monthly Status Reports - Delhi HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment concerning a habeas corpus petition, the Delhi High Court, on January 25, 2024, ordered the continuation of diligent efforts to trace a missing 15-year-old girl. The case, titled Sangita Morya Versus State (W.P.(CRL) 961/2022), was presided over by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Jain.

The petitioner, Sangita Morya, approached the court seeking help in finding her minor daughter, Ms. ‘S’, who went missing under mysterious circumstances on January 18, 2022. The petitioner expressed suspicion over her neighbor, Vishal, aged 30, who has since been declared a proclaimed offender under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

In the court's observation, it was noted, "In light of the aforesaid discussion, since all possible efforts to trace the missing girl have been made, we hereby dispose of the present writ petition." This emphasizes the court's acknowledgment of the efforts made by the police in this troubling situation.

Further elaborating on the steps to be taken, the court directed, "The concerned police officials to file a monthly status report before the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate." The directive aims to ensure continued and focused efforts in the investigation. The court also ordered that "if any clue is found about the minor daughter of the petitioner, the same shall be communicated to her and if she is rescued, she be produced before the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate."

This judgment highlights the High Court's commitment to the safety and well-being of minors and underscores the importance of persistent efforts in missing person cases. The case, however, remains a matter of deep concern, with the whereabouts of the young girl still unknown.

The petitioner was not represented by any advocate, while the State was represented by Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.), along with Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Mr. Abhinav Kr. Arya, and Mr. Shivesh Kaushik.

Date of Decision: 25th January 2024

SANGITA MORYA VS STATE

 

Latest Legal News