Non-Compliance With Rule 14 Of NDPS Rules 2022 Regarding Quantitative Test Vitiates Prosecution Case And Renders Detention Illegal: Allahabad High Court Supreme Court Directs Systematic Audit And Institutional Accountability For Safety In Public Spaces Under Article 21 Extra-Judicial Confession Made Before Police Cannot Solely Sustain Preventive Detention: Supreme Court Pre-Trial Incarceration Cannot Masquerade As Punitive Detention When Trial Is Not Imminent: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Radial ‘Hub-And-Spoke’ Valuation Models For Contiguous Lands Are Legally Unsustainable: Supreme Court Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Is A Valid Consequence Upon Failure To Pay Balance Sale Consideration Under IBC Liquidation Process: Supreme Court Res Judicata | Suit For Specific Performance Barred If Relief Was Available In Prior Suit For Permanent Injunction And Not Claimed: Supreme Court RERA | Allottee’s Right To Seek Refund Is Absolute And Unqualified, Not Subject To Promoter’s Completion Of Project: Bombay High Court Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC | Appellate Court Cannot Summarily Reject Addition Of Legal Heirs Based On Unproven Documents Without Reason: Calcutta High Court Order XIV Rule 5 CPC | Trial Court Must Frame Additional Issues Based On Liberty Granted By Supreme Court To Ensure Just Adjudication: Delhi High Court Mere Citation Of Wrong Provision Does Not Invalidate Order If Court Possessed Jurisdiction: Gujarat High Court Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC Cannot Be Granted Over Large Unidentified Tract Of Land Without Establishing Prima Facie Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 125 CrPC | Mere Rejection Of Permanent Alimony Plea In Divorce Proceedings Does Not Bar Claim For Maintenance: Karnataka High Court Section 311 BNSS | Trial Court Has Discretion To Record Evidence In Narrative Form; Accused Cannot Insist On Question-Answer Format: Kerala High Court Section 482 CrPC | Principle Of Parity Cannot Be Invoked To Quash FIR If Allegations Against Accused Are Distinct And Substantiated: Madhya Pradesh High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Tribunal Cannot Grant 'Right Of Recovery' To Insurer Without Evidence Of Policy Violation: Orissa High Court Mere Inadequacy Of Consideration Or Illiteracy Does Not Vitiate Specific Performance Unless Exploitation Is Proved: Madras High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Converted Into Parallel Forum To Enforce Civil Decrees: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 18 Rule 17 CPC | Reopening Evidence At The Stage Of Arguments Without Compelling Grounds Amounts To Abuse Of Process: Telangana High Court Cannot Circumvent Bail Granted By Supreme Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes PITNDPS Preventive Detention Order

“High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Attempted Homicide Case; Forum-Shopping Tactics Condemned”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the High Court of Kerala, presided over by The Honourable Mr. Justice A. Badharudeen, delivered a crucial judgement on Friday, the 21st day of July 2023, denying anticipatory bail to the petitioner/accused, Bipin Sunny, in a case pertaining to Crime No.27/2023 of Aloor Police Station, Thrissur. The accused, aged 28 years, was charged with wrongful restraint and attempting to cause culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

The court heard arguments from the petitioner’s counsel, the counsel for the de facto complainant, and the learned Public Prosecutor. The prosecution alleged that on January 7, 2023, the accused wrongfully restrained the de facto complainant and attempted to harm him, resulting in injuries. The prosecution invoked Sections 341, 325, and 308 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) against the accused.

Interestingly, this was the second application for anticipatory bail filed by Bipin Sunny, after an earlier plea was dismissed by the High Court in a detailed order (Annexure 3). The petitioner’s counsel contended that there were changes in circumstances, and other accused in related cases had been granted anticipatory bail.

However, the court was not swayed by the petitioner’s arguments. Upon examining the case diary and considering the earlier order, the court found the petitioner’s complicity in the incident to be prima facie established. Consequently, the court opined that arrest and custodial interrogation of the accused were necessary to recover the weapon used in the alleged crime.

Furthermore, the court expressed deep concern over the petitioner’s actions in filing an anticipatory bail application before the Sessions Court after suppressing the dismissal of the earlier application by the High Court. In this regard, the court emphatically deprecated such forum-shopping tactics and suppression of facts, emphasizing that second or successive anticipatory bail applications, after dismissal by the High Court, must be filed before the High Court itself.

In its final verdict, the High Court dismissed the bail application and directed the registry to forward a copy of the order to all Sessions Judges in the state, stressing the importance of adhering to judicial decorum and discipline.

Date of Decision: 21st July 2023

BIPIN SUNNY  vs STATE OF KERALA

Latest Legal News