Subsequent Declaration Of Juvenility Does Not Vitiate Conviction On Merits: Supreme Court Borrowers Cannot Ignore Bank Accounting Systems And Suspense Accounts To Claim Arbitrary Reductions In Loan Dues: Supreme Court Re-employed Judicial Officers Cannot Claim 6th Pay Commission Scales: Supreme Court Supreme Court Slams High Court For Erroneously Exercising Review Jurisdiction On 'Mistaken Notion', Restores Employee's ACP Benefits Trademark Infringement: Defendant Can Cross-Examine Plaintiff On Use Of Brand Name Even If Written Statement Is Not On Record: Supreme Court 'Interest And Welfare Of Child Would Be Best Served': Supreme Court Invokes Parens Patriae In Contempt Plea; Revokes Own Custody Order Mere Absence From MCA Records Cannot Absolve Accused Under Section 138 NI Act If Prima Facie Role Is Shown: Punjab & Haryana High Court Incomplete Or Defective Real Estate Application Cannot Claim Deemed Registration Under Section 5(2) Of RERA Act: Orissa High Court Mere Criminal Antecedents Cannot Justify Invoking 'Organized Crime' Offence Under Section 111 BNS Without Fulfilling Statutory Ingredients: Madhya Pradesh High Court 'Testator's Character & Prior Gifts Justify Unequal Distribution': Madras High Court Upholds Holographic Will Minority Status Cannot Arrest Limitation Period For Appeal If Minor Was Represented By Natural Guardian In Original Proceedings: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Admission Of Property Boundaries In Family Partition Deeds Destroys Coparceners' Claim That Land Remains Joint Ancestral Property: Karnataka High Court Mesne Profits Must Reflect Open Market Letting Value Rather Than Static Contractual Rates: Delhi High Court Law Graduates Who Fail To Clear AIBE Within Two Years Cannot Practice In Any Court, Tribunal Or Revenue Authority: Allahabad High Court Bombay High Court Slams 'Growing Tendency' To Bypass GST Appeals, Says 'Natural Justice' Not A Blanket Excuse For Writ Petitions Proportionate Cost Only Can Be Awarded On Decreed Amount, Not On Total Plaint Valuation: Kerala High Court

“High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Attempted Homicide Case; Forum-Shopping Tactics Condemned”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the High Court of Kerala, presided over by The Honourable Mr. Justice A. Badharudeen, delivered a crucial judgement on Friday, the 21st day of July 2023, denying anticipatory bail to the petitioner/accused, Bipin Sunny, in a case pertaining to Crime No.27/2023 of Aloor Police Station, Thrissur. The accused, aged 28 years, was charged with wrongful restraint and attempting to cause culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

The court heard arguments from the petitioner’s counsel, the counsel for the de facto complainant, and the learned Public Prosecutor. The prosecution alleged that on January 7, 2023, the accused wrongfully restrained the de facto complainant and attempted to harm him, resulting in injuries. The prosecution invoked Sections 341, 325, and 308 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) against the accused.

Interestingly, this was the second application for anticipatory bail filed by Bipin Sunny, after an earlier plea was dismissed by the High Court in a detailed order (Annexure 3). The petitioner’s counsel contended that there were changes in circumstances, and other accused in related cases had been granted anticipatory bail.

However, the court was not swayed by the petitioner’s arguments. Upon examining the case diary and considering the earlier order, the court found the petitioner’s complicity in the incident to be prima facie established. Consequently, the court opined that arrest and custodial interrogation of the accused were necessary to recover the weapon used in the alleged crime.

Furthermore, the court expressed deep concern over the petitioner’s actions in filing an anticipatory bail application before the Sessions Court after suppressing the dismissal of the earlier application by the High Court. In this regard, the court emphatically deprecated such forum-shopping tactics and suppression of facts, emphasizing that second or successive anticipatory bail applications, after dismissal by the High Court, must be filed before the High Court itself.

In its final verdict, the High Court dismissed the bail application and directed the registry to forward a copy of the order to all Sessions Judges in the state, stressing the importance of adhering to judicial decorum and discipline.

Date of Decision: 21st July 2023

BIPIN SUNNY  vs STATE OF KERALA

Latest Legal News