Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

“High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Attempted Homicide Case; Forum-Shopping Tactics Condemned”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the High Court of Kerala, presided over by The Honourable Mr. Justice A. Badharudeen, delivered a crucial judgement on Friday, the 21st day of July 2023, denying anticipatory bail to the petitioner/accused, Bipin Sunny, in a case pertaining to Crime No.27/2023 of Aloor Police Station, Thrissur. The accused, aged 28 years, was charged with wrongful restraint and attempting to cause culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

The court heard arguments from the petitioner’s counsel, the counsel for the de facto complainant, and the learned Public Prosecutor. The prosecution alleged that on January 7, 2023, the accused wrongfully restrained the de facto complainant and attempted to harm him, resulting in injuries. The prosecution invoked Sections 341, 325, and 308 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) against the accused.

Interestingly, this was the second application for anticipatory bail filed by Bipin Sunny, after an earlier plea was dismissed by the High Court in a detailed order (Annexure 3). The petitioner’s counsel contended that there were changes in circumstances, and other accused in related cases had been granted anticipatory bail.

However, the court was not swayed by the petitioner’s arguments. Upon examining the case diary and considering the earlier order, the court found the petitioner’s complicity in the incident to be prima facie established. Consequently, the court opined that arrest and custodial interrogation of the accused were necessary to recover the weapon used in the alleged crime.

Furthermore, the court expressed deep concern over the petitioner’s actions in filing an anticipatory bail application before the Sessions Court after suppressing the dismissal of the earlier application by the High Court. In this regard, the court emphatically deprecated such forum-shopping tactics and suppression of facts, emphasizing that second or successive anticipatory bail applications, after dismissal by the High Court, must be filed before the High Court itself.

In its final verdict, the High Court dismissed the bail application and directed the registry to forward a copy of the order to all Sessions Judges in the state, stressing the importance of adhering to judicial decorum and discipline.

Date of Decision: 21st July 2023

BIPIN SUNNY  vs STATE OF KERALA

Latest Legal News