Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court

High Court Declares Recruitment Challenge Beyond Its Jurisdiction: Directs Petitioner's Case to Central Administrative Tribunal

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Delhi, led by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, declared that challenges against recruitment processes under the jurisdiction of the Central Government or Delhi Government fall outside the ambit of the High Court. This declaration came during the judgment on the writ petition W.P.(C) 802/2024 filed by Pinky Yadav against the Government of NCT of Delhi.

Justice Gedela, in his oral judgment, stated, "This Court is of the considered opinion that the present writ petition would not be maintainable as such before this Court." This observation was made in reference to Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1965, which precludes High Courts from hearing challenges that pertain to recruitment processes of the Central or Delhi Government.

The petitioner, represented by Ms. Shriya Chanda, argued that she had cleared Tier-I and Tier-II examinations but missed the deadline for a renotified examination. This renotification was in compliance with a Supreme Court order dated March 3, 2021. Acknowledging the petitioner's unique predicament, the Court decided to transfer the case to the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi.

The High Court directed that the writ petition be renumbered as an original application in accordance with the regulations of the Central Administrative Tribunal. Furthermore, in an attempt to expedite the proceedings, the Court requested the Tribunal to consider the petition on January 23, 2024.

 Decision: 19 January 2024

PINKY YADAV VS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Latest Legal News