Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Right to Be Considered for Promotion, Not a Right to Promotion: Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Retrospective Promotion    |     Inherent Power of Courts Can Recall Admission of Insufficiently Stamped Documents: Supreme Court    |     Courts Cannot Substitute Their Opinion for Security Agencies in Threat Perception Assessments: J&K High Court Directs Reassessment of Political Leader's Threat Perception    |     Service Law | Violation of Natural Justice: Discharge Without Notice or Reason: Gauhati High Court Orders Reinstatement and Regularization of Circle Organizers    |     Jharkhand High Court Quashes Family Court Order, Reaffirms Jurisdiction Based on Minor’s Ordinary Residence in Delhi    |     Ex-Serviceman Status Ceases After First Employment in Government Job: Calcutta High Court Upholds SBI’s Cancellation of Ex-Serviceman's Appointment Over False Declaration of Employment    |     Maxim Res Ipsa Loquitur Applies When State Instrumentalities Are Directly Responsible: Delhi High Court Orders MCD to Pay ₹10 Lakhs Compensation for Death    |     Wilful Avoidance of Service Must Be Established Before Passing Ex Parte Order Under Section 126(2) CrPC: Patna High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Maintenance Order    |     MP High Court Imposes Rs. 10,000 Costs for Prolonging Litigation, Upholds Eviction of Petitioners from Father's Property    |     When Detention Unnecessary Despite Serious Allegations of Fraud Bail Should be Granted: Kerala HC    |     Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Relocation Alone Cannot Justify Transfer: Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Move Case from Nellore to Delhi, Orders Fresh Probe    |     Punjab & Haryana HC Double Bench Upholds Protection for Married Partners in Live-In Relationships, Denies Same for Minors    |    

Harassment and Cruelty for Dowry Soon Before Death Proven Beyond Doubt - Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Conviction in Dowry Death Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Andhra Pradesh High Court upheld the conviction of Chengaipattu @ Nathineni Sreenivasulu under Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for the dowry death of his wife. The judgment, pronounced on January 25, 2024, by Justice A.V. Ravindra Babu, reiterates the seriousness of dowry-related offences and the court's commitment to addressing them sternly.

The appellant was convicted for the dowry death of his wife, occurring within seven years of marriage under abnormal circumstances. The court meticulously analyzed the evidence presented, including the testimony of family members and mediators, to establish continuous harassment and cruelty for additional dowry demands.

Justice Ravindra Babu, in his detailed judgment, observed, "The prosecution categorically established the essential ingredients of Section 304-B of IPC. Further, the evidence adduced by the prosecution attracts Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, which contemplates a demand directly or indirectly from the parents or other relatives or guardian of the bride or bridegroom for dowry." This observation underlines the court's determination in upholding justice in dowry-related cases.

The court noted the presence of ante-mortem injuries on the deceased, indicating physical harassment, and the consumption of poison leading to death, which satisfied the proximity test for 'soon before her death' as required under Section 304-B IPC.

In terms of sentencing, Sreenivasulu was handed rigorous imprisonment for seven years for the offence under Section 304-B IPC and simple imprisonment for one year under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, with both sentences to run concurrently.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the judiciary's role in addressing and deterring dowry-related crimes, ensuring justice for victims of such heinous acts. The High Court's decision to dismiss the criminal appeal and uphold the trial court's judgment highlights the seriousness with which the judicial system views dowry deaths, a prevalent social evil in India.

Date of Judgment: 25th January 2024

Chengaipattu @ Nathineni Sreenivasulu VS The State of Andhra Pradesh

 

Similar News