Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

Harassment and Cruelty for Dowry Soon Before Death Proven Beyond Doubt - Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Conviction in Dowry Death Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Andhra Pradesh High Court upheld the conviction of Chengaipattu @ Nathineni Sreenivasulu under Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for the dowry death of his wife. The judgment, pronounced on January 25, 2024, by Justice A.V. Ravindra Babu, reiterates the seriousness of dowry-related offences and the court's commitment to addressing them sternly.

The appellant was convicted for the dowry death of his wife, occurring within seven years of marriage under abnormal circumstances. The court meticulously analyzed the evidence presented, including the testimony of family members and mediators, to establish continuous harassment and cruelty for additional dowry demands.

Justice Ravindra Babu, in his detailed judgment, observed, "The prosecution categorically established the essential ingredients of Section 304-B of IPC. Further, the evidence adduced by the prosecution attracts Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, which contemplates a demand directly or indirectly from the parents or other relatives or guardian of the bride or bridegroom for dowry." This observation underlines the court's determination in upholding justice in dowry-related cases.

The court noted the presence of ante-mortem injuries on the deceased, indicating physical harassment, and the consumption of poison leading to death, which satisfied the proximity test for 'soon before her death' as required under Section 304-B IPC.

In terms of sentencing, Sreenivasulu was handed rigorous imprisonment for seven years for the offence under Section 304-B IPC and simple imprisonment for one year under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, with both sentences to run concurrently.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the judiciary's role in addressing and deterring dowry-related crimes, ensuring justice for victims of such heinous acts. The High Court's decision to dismiss the criminal appeal and uphold the trial court's judgment highlights the seriousness with which the judicial system views dowry deaths, a prevalent social evil in India.

Date of Judgment: 25th January 2024

Chengaipattu @ Nathineni Sreenivasulu VS The State of Andhra Pradesh

 

Similar News