Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC

Harassment and Cruelty for Dowry Soon Before Death Proven Beyond Doubt - Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Conviction in Dowry Death Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Andhra Pradesh High Court upheld the conviction of Chengaipattu @ Nathineni Sreenivasulu under Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for the dowry death of his wife. The judgment, pronounced on January 25, 2024, by Justice A.V. Ravindra Babu, reiterates the seriousness of dowry-related offences and the court's commitment to addressing them sternly.

The appellant was convicted for the dowry death of his wife, occurring within seven years of marriage under abnormal circumstances. The court meticulously analyzed the evidence presented, including the testimony of family members and mediators, to establish continuous harassment and cruelty for additional dowry demands.

Justice Ravindra Babu, in his detailed judgment, observed, "The prosecution categorically established the essential ingredients of Section 304-B of IPC. Further, the evidence adduced by the prosecution attracts Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, which contemplates a demand directly or indirectly from the parents or other relatives or guardian of the bride or bridegroom for dowry." This observation underlines the court's determination in upholding justice in dowry-related cases.

The court noted the presence of ante-mortem injuries on the deceased, indicating physical harassment, and the consumption of poison leading to death, which satisfied the proximity test for 'soon before her death' as required under Section 304-B IPC.

In terms of sentencing, Sreenivasulu was handed rigorous imprisonment for seven years for the offence under Section 304-B IPC and simple imprisonment for one year under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, with both sentences to run concurrently.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the judiciary's role in addressing and deterring dowry-related crimes, ensuring justice for victims of such heinous acts. The High Court's decision to dismiss the criminal appeal and uphold the trial court's judgment highlights the seriousness with which the judicial system views dowry deaths, a prevalent social evil in India.

Date of Judgment: 25th January 2024

Chengaipattu @ Nathineni Sreenivasulu VS The State of Andhra Pradesh

 

Latest Legal News