Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Gujarat High Court Upholds Denial of Furlough to Naryan Swami - Concerns of Public Safety

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Gujarat High Court has upheld the decision of the authorities to deny furlough to a convict, emphasizing the need to balance the reformation of the convict with the interests of public safety and law and order. The court stated, "While meting out humane treatment to the convicts, care is taken to ensure that kindness to the convicts does not result in cruelty to society."

The petitioner had invoked the extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 227 read with Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, seeking release on furlough. However, the court, acknowledging the discretionary nature of furlough and the need to consider public interest, upheld the decision of the authorities to deny the petitioner's request.

The court took into account the circumstances and opinions presented by the authorities while refusing furlough. These included the gravity of the offenses committed by the petitioner, criminal misconduct during the trial, threats and assaults on witnesses, and the petitioner's reported illegal activities inside the jail. The authorities also expressed concerns about the petitioner's potential influence on his followers and the possibility of him fleeing the country with their aid.

Highlighting the convict's conduct, the court noted instances of the petitioner's involvement in organized crime, threats to law enforcement officials, and attempts to disrupt the legal process. The court also highlighted the petitioner's contemptuous behavior, such as submitting a fake medical certificate to the court.

The judgment emphasized the court's responsibility to ensure that the constitutional purpose of deprivation of freedom is not defeated by the prison administration. It concluded that releasing the petitioner on furlough would pose a risk to public safety and undermine the objectives of imprisonment. Therefore, the court found justification in the authorities' decision to deny furlough.

Date of Decision: 08 June 2023

ASHUMAL HARPALANI vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Latest Legal News