Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

Gujarat High Court Upholds Denial of Furlough to Naryan Swami - Concerns of Public Safety

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Gujarat High Court has upheld the decision of the authorities to deny furlough to a convict, emphasizing the need to balance the reformation of the convict with the interests of public safety and law and order. The court stated, "While meting out humane treatment to the convicts, care is taken to ensure that kindness to the convicts does not result in cruelty to society."

The petitioner had invoked the extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 227 read with Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, seeking release on furlough. However, the court, acknowledging the discretionary nature of furlough and the need to consider public interest, upheld the decision of the authorities to deny the petitioner's request.

The court took into account the circumstances and opinions presented by the authorities while refusing furlough. These included the gravity of the offenses committed by the petitioner, criminal misconduct during the trial, threats and assaults on witnesses, and the petitioner's reported illegal activities inside the jail. The authorities also expressed concerns about the petitioner's potential influence on his followers and the possibility of him fleeing the country with their aid.

Highlighting the convict's conduct, the court noted instances of the petitioner's involvement in organized crime, threats to law enforcement officials, and attempts to disrupt the legal process. The court also highlighted the petitioner's contemptuous behavior, such as submitting a fake medical certificate to the court.

The judgment emphasized the court's responsibility to ensure that the constitutional purpose of deprivation of freedom is not defeated by the prison administration. It concluded that releasing the petitioner on furlough would pose a risk to public safety and undermine the objectives of imprisonment. Therefore, the court found justification in the authorities' decision to deny furlough.

Date of Decision: 08 June 2023

ASHUMAL HARPALANI vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Latest Legal News