Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court Writ Petition Cannot Be Dismissed On ‘Forum Non Conveniens’ If Respondent's Office Is Within Court's Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Supreme Court Doubts 'Sajjan Singh' Ruling; Refers To Larger Bench Whether Third Judge Can Re-examine Unanimous Findings Under Section 392 CrPC SARFAESI Sale Vitiated If Balance 75% Bid Amount Is Paid Beyond 15 Days Without Written Extension Agreement: Supreme Court Delhi High Court Can't Refuse Writ Petition Against BSF Dismissal Merely Because Cause Of Action Arose Outside Delhi: Supreme Court Private Rights Must Yield To Public Interest: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Removal Of Encroachments On Public Road Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Re-Agitate Factual Disputes Or Seek Re-Hearing On Merits: Allahabad High Court Recovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act Vitiated If Police Already Present At Spot Before Arrival Of Panch Witnesses: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Compliance Or Delay In Procedure Under Section 52A NDPS Act Is An Irregularity, Not An Illegality Entitling Accused To Bail: Calcutta High Court Recovery Of Weapon Used In Commission Of Offence Not A Sine Qua Non For Conviction If Ocular Evidence Is Corroborated: Allahabad High Court Seized Vehicles Shouldn't Be Kept Idle To Rot In Police Stations, Utility Vanishes Due To Stagnation: Karnataka High Court Or 39 CPC | Trial Court Erred In Dismissing Injunction Application Despite Respondent's 'No Objection' To Restraining Share Transfer: Gauhati High Court Issuing NBW Merely For Absence Of Accused Already On Bail Is Improper; Liberty Cannot Be Dealt With Lightly: Orissa High Court 138 NI | Expert Examination Of Disputed Documents Essential For Just Adjudication If Complainant Denies Handwriting & Signatures: Rajasthan High Court Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Cannot Be Invoked To Fill Lacunae In Evidence If Party Voluntarily Closed Evidence In Trial Court: Delhi High Court

Gujarat High Court Upholds Denial of Furlough to Naryan Swami - Concerns of Public Safety

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Gujarat High Court has upheld the decision of the authorities to deny furlough to a convict, emphasizing the need to balance the reformation of the convict with the interests of public safety and law and order. The court stated, "While meting out humane treatment to the convicts, care is taken to ensure that kindness to the convicts does not result in cruelty to society."

The petitioner had invoked the extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 227 read with Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, seeking release on furlough. However, the court, acknowledging the discretionary nature of furlough and the need to consider public interest, upheld the decision of the authorities to deny the petitioner's request.

The court took into account the circumstances and opinions presented by the authorities while refusing furlough. These included the gravity of the offenses committed by the petitioner, criminal misconduct during the trial, threats and assaults on witnesses, and the petitioner's reported illegal activities inside the jail. The authorities also expressed concerns about the petitioner's potential influence on his followers and the possibility of him fleeing the country with their aid.

Highlighting the convict's conduct, the court noted instances of the petitioner's involvement in organized crime, threats to law enforcement officials, and attempts to disrupt the legal process. The court also highlighted the petitioner's contemptuous behavior, such as submitting a fake medical certificate to the court.

The judgment emphasized the court's responsibility to ensure that the constitutional purpose of deprivation of freedom is not defeated by the prison administration. It concluded that releasing the petitioner on furlough would pose a risk to public safety and undermine the objectives of imprisonment. Therefore, the court found justification in the authorities' decision to deny furlough.

Date of Decision: 08 June 2023

ASHUMAL HARPALANI vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Latest Legal News