Even 1.5 Years in Jail Doesn’t Dilute Section 37 NDPS Rigour: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in 710 Kg Poppy Husk Case Stay of Conviction Nullifies Disqualification Under Section 8(3) RP Act: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Against Rahul Gandhi Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Uncover ₹2 Crore MGNREGA Scam: Kerala High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail for Vendors in Corruption Case Order 41 Rule 23 CPC | Trial Court Cannot Decide Title Solely on a Vacated Judgment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes By Bar Associations Cannot Stall Justice: Allahabad High Court Holds Office Bearers Liable for Contempt if Revenue Suits Are Delayed Due to Boycotts To Constitute a Service PE, Services Must Be Furnished Within India Through Employees Present in India: Delhi High Court Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation Waiver of Right Under Section 50 NDPS is Valid Even Without Panch Signatures: Bombay High Court Agricultural Land Is 'Property' Under Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937: A.P. High Court Tenant Who Pays Rent After Verifying Landlord’s Will Cannot Dispute His Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Eviction Challenge by HP State Cooperative Bank Clever Drafting Cannot Override Limitation Bar: Gujarat High Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance Once Divorce by Mutual Consent Is Final, Wife Cannot Pursue Criminal Case for Stridhan Without Reserving Right to Do So: Himachal Pradesh High Court Caste-Based Insults Must Show Intent – Mere Abuse Not Enough for Atrocities Act: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Represent to Detaining Authority Vitiates NSA Detention: Gauhati High Court Awarding Further Interest On Penal Charges Is Contrary To Fundamental Policy Of Indian Arbitration Law: Bombay High Court

"Gujarat High Court Grants  Alimony in Marriage Dissolution Case, Emphasizing 'Wife’s Entitlement to Comparable Standard of Living'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Gujarat High Court, led by justices Ashutosh Shastri and Hemant M. Prachchhak, has set a precedent in matrimonial law by granting a lump sum permanent alimony of Rs.12,50,000. This decision came in the case of Pratiksha D/O Anantbhai Ratilal Prajapati vs. Kalpeshbhai Bhagwanbhai Jesalpura, challenging the Family Court's decree of marriage dissolution.

The High Court, in its decision dated December 12, 2023, underlined the importance of ensuring a comparable standard of living for the wife, stating, "the wife is entitled to maintain a standard of living similar to the husband's." This observation emphasizes the court's commitment to ensuring fairness and equality in marital dissolution cases.

The appeal was filed against the original judgment of the Family Court, which had dissolved the marriage but did not grant alimony to the appellant. The High Court, after careful examination of the evidence and income of both parties, modified the Family Court’s decision. The justices highlighted a significant income disparity between the appellant and the respondent, which necessitated the alimony award.

Justice Shastri and Justice Prachchhak noted the irrefutable evidence of marital cruelty and a clear non-analytical approach in the Family Court’s findings. They pointed out that the Family Court’s conclusion of cruelty by the wife was unsupported by concrete evidence.

The Court also acknowledged the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage, citing the impossibility of reconciliation and the need to put an end to ongoing litigation. Advocates B. J. Trivedi and Premal R. Joshi represented the appellant and respondent, respectively, in this critical case.

In their ruling, the justices referred to several landmark cases, including Rajnesh vs. Neha and Amit Kumar vs. Suman Beniwal, underlining the legal framework for determining alimony and addressing the nuances of marital dissolution.

This judgment is seen as a significant step towards addressing the financial implications of marriage dissolution and setting a benchmark for future alimony determinations in India. The decision is being hailed as a progressive move towards ensuring equitable treatment of spouses in matrimonial disputes.

Date of Decision: 12-12-2023

PRATIKSHA  VS KALPESHBHAI BHAGWANBHAI JESALPURA

 

Latest Legal News