High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Acquits Accused, Questions “Capacity of Victim to Make Coherent Statement” with 100% Burn Injuries High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Bail Plea in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam: Rajdeep Singh Case Execution of Conveyance Ends Arbitration Clause; Appeal for Arbitration Rejected: Bombay High Court Allahabad High Court Denies Tax Refund for Hybrid Vehicle Purchased Before Electric Vehicle Exemption Policy Entering A Room with Someone Cannot, By Any Stretch Of Imagination, Be Considered Consent For Sexual Intercourse: Bombay High Court No Specific Format Needed for Dying Declaration, Focus on Mental State and Voluntariness: Calcutta High Court Delhi High Court Allows Direct Appeal Under DVAT Act Without Tribunal Reference for Pre-2005 Tax Periods NDPS | Mere Registration of Cases Does Not Override Presumption of Innocence: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Previous Antecedents and No Communal Tension: High Court Grants Bail in Caste-Based Abuse Case Detention of Petitioner Would Amount to Pre-Trial Punishment: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail in Dowry Harassment Case Loss of Confidence Must Be Objectively Proven to Deny Reinstatement: Kerala High Court Reinstates Workman After Flawed Domestic Enquiry Procedural lapses should not deny justice: Andhra High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case Canteen Subsidy Constitutes Part of Dearness Allowance Under EPF Act: Gujarat High Court Concurrent Findings Demonstrate Credibility – Jharkhand High Court Affirms Conviction in Cheating Case 125 Cr.P.C | Financial responsibility towards dependents cannot be shirked due to personal obligations: Punjab and Haryana High Court Mere Acceptance of Money Without Proof of Demand is Not Sufficient to Establish Corruption Charges Gujrat High Court Evidence Insufficient to Support Claims: Orissa High Court Affirms Appellate Court’s Reversal in Wrongful Confinement and Defamation Case Harmonious Interpretation of PWDV Act and Senior Citizens Act is Crucial: Kerala High Court in Domestic Violence Case

Gratuity is an entitlement of the employee… the Municipality is not showing any charity by releasing gratuity – Calcutta HC Reiterates Right to Interest on Delayed Gratuity Payments

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Calcutta High Court has affirmed the entitlement of employees to interest on delayed gratuity payments, reinforcing that “Gratuity is an entitlement of the employee who has rendered uninterrupted and honourable service to the municipality… the Municipality as the employer is not showing any charity by releasing gratuity in favour of its retired employees.”

Facts and Legal Background:

Amiya Kumar Roy, a retired employee of the Bhatpara Municipality, did not receive his gratuity post-retirement on February 28, 2018. Following a legal battle initiated in 2020, the High Court had previously ordered the gratuity payment within eight weeks on August 5, 2021, leaving the question of interest for delayed payment open.

Despite the Municipality’s claims of financial hardships, the court noted that such constraints do not exempt an employer from fulfilling statutory obligations such as timely gratuity payments. The Municipality’s subsequent appeal challenged an additional demand for interest, which was addressed in the current proceedings.

Detailed Court Assessment and Ruling:

The bench, consisting of Hon’ble Justice Arijit Banerjee and Hon’ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas, meticulously rejected the Municipality’s argument based on the doctrines of waiver and estoppel, aligning with previous judgments that upheld employees’ rights to interest on delayed payments under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

Right to Gratuity and Interest: The court highlighted that gratuity, a statutory right under Section 7(3A) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, ensures a dignified post-retirement life for employees. Interest compensates for delays in gratuity payments, underpinning the survival and dignity of retired workers.

Statutory Obligations over Financial Excuses: The judges noted that financial difficulties cited by the Municipality do not justify delays in gratuity payments, emphasizing that the obligations to pay gratuity and applicable interest are statutory and not conditional on the employer’s financial status.

Interest Rate Application: The court upheld the interest rate of 10% per annum, as specified by the Central Government, from the due date to the actual payment date. However, the court set aside the lower court’s directive for an additional 3% interest for further delays post-judgment, marking a critical assessment of the lawful interest limits.

Conclusion and Modification of Orders:

The Calcutta High Court directed Bhatpara Municipality to pay the due gratuity with a 10% annual interest rate within eight weeks from the judgment date. The decision to award an additional interest of 3% beyond the statutory maximum was reversed, adhering strictly to the legal provisions.

Date of Decision: May 3, 2024

Bhatpara Municipality v. Amiya Kumar Roy & Ors

Similar News