Order Taking Cognizance Must Reflect Application Of Mind; Section 197 CrPC Sanction Mandatory For Prosecuting Public Servants: Karnataka High Court Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Partially Against Specific Defendants Or Properties; Limitation Is A Triable Issue: Telangana High Court Employee Having National Trade Certificate & Prior Experience To Be Treated As 'Highly Skilled' For Compensation: Orissa High Court Insurance Company Entitled To Subpoena Investigating Officer For Vehicle Records When Insured Is Untraceable: Madras High Court Seller's Fraudulent Conduct & Non-Disclosure Of Mortgage Justify Refund Of Advance Sale Consideration: Kerala High Court Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act Filed By Partner On Behalf Of Firm Maintainable Even Without Specific Authorization Letter: Gujarat High Court Extension Of Remand Beyond 180 Days Under NDPS Act Requires Public Prosecutor's Independent Report, Not Just IO's Request: Andhra Pradesh High Court Orissa Grama Panchayats Act | No Bar On Rescheduling No-Confidence Motion Meeting Before Its Commencement: High Court Non-Preparation Of ‘Nil’ Seizure List After Searching Raiding Officer Not Fatal To NDPS Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Registration Of Trademark Confers Exclusive Right To Sue For Infringement Irrespective Of Whether Mark Is In Use: Delhi High Court Presence Of Magistrate Not Mandatory For Recording Dying Declaration; Conviction Can Be Based On DD Recorded By Police: Bombay High Court Routine Bank Transfers Between Spouses For Daily Needs Are Gratuitous Payments, Not Recoverable As Entrusted Funds: Kerala High Court Clerical Lapses Under Work Pressure Amount To Dereliction Of Duty, Not Crime: Madras High Court Quashes Corruption Case Against Deputy BDO Burden Of Proving Sale Deed Is Bona Fide Lies On Beneficiary If Executant Is Illiterate Or Vulnerable: Andhra Pradesh High Court Employee Cannot Take Advantage Of Own Delay; Employer Not Required To Preserve Disciplinary Records For Eternity: Bombay High Court Deadline To File Evidence Under Rule 45 Trade Marks Rules Is Directory, Registrar Can Extend Time Under Section 131: Bombay High Court Exclusion Of Interest In Insurance Policy Is Conditional; Insurer Must Plead & Prove Employer's Failure To Comply With Act To Avoid Liability: Kerala High Court Practicing Lawyer Entitled To Interim Maintenance From Husband If Income Is Insufficient To Maintain Standard Of Living: Orissa High Court Section 138 NI Act Offences Can Be Compounded At Any Stage Even After Dismissal Of Revision Or Appeal: Madras High Court Unsuccessful Party Seeking Post-Award Interim Relief Under Section 9 Faces 'Higher Threshold', Must Show Rare & Compelling Circumstances: Bombay High Court

Gauhati High Court Acquits Appellant in Landmark POCSO Case - Lack of Conclusive Age Evidence and Consensual Relationship

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Gauhati High Court acquitted the appellant in a case that challenged his conviction under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act). The judgment, delivered by Honourable Mrs. Justice Malasri Nandi on 8th August 2023, hinged on the pivotal aspect of age determination and its impact on the applicability of the POCSO Act.

The appellant, who was accused of engaging in a consensual sexual relationship that led to a pregnancy, was sentenced to a rigorous imprisonment of 10 years based on the lower court’s judgment. The victim’s age was a crucial element in this case, as the provisions of the POCSO Act apply to victims below 18 years of age.

Justice Nandi’s observations on age determination played a pivotal role in the acquittal. The radiological report indicated the victim’s age as 16 to 17 years, but the court took into consideration the margin of error of two years on either side for such assessments. The judge highlighted that “ossification test or other medical test, though a guiding factor, is not conclusive,” and that the benefit of doubt regarding age determination should be given to the accused.

“It is also a settled position that the benefit of doubt with regard to the age of the victim always goes in favor of the accused,” Justice Nandi emphasized. She further pointed out that the prosecution failed to adduce conclusive evidence regarding the victim’s age, including physical growth and secondary sexual characteristics, leaving ample room for doubt.

The court’s ruling rested on the principle that the prosecution had not proved beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was below 18 years of age at the time of the alleged incident. As a result, the provisions of the POCSO Act could not be invoked, and the consensual nature of the relationship further underscored the acquittal.

This landmark judgement not only highlights the importance of robust age determination procedures but also sheds light on the complexities of consensual relationships within the purview of the POCSO Act. Legal experts are lauding the Gauhati High Court’s thorough analysis of age determination evidence and its adherence to the principle of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ in cases of sexual offences involving minors.

Date of Decision: 08 August 2023 

SHIVA CHAUTAL UDALGURI, ASSAM. vs THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY PP, ASSAM.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/XXX_Vs_State_08Aug2023_Gauhati_HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News