Unregistered Agreement Of Sale Entered Before Attachment Cannot Defeat Decree-Holder’s Claim: Andhra Pradesh High Court No Presumption That Joint Family Possesses Joint Property; Female Hindu Absolute Owner Of Property Purchased In Her Name: Allahabad High Court Age Determination Must Strictly Follow Hierarchy Of Documents Under JJ Act: Orissa High Court Acquits Man Of POCSO Charges Once 'C' Form Declarations Are Signed, Burden Shifts To Buyer To Prove Payment Of Outstanding Dues: Madras High Court Section 213 Succession Act No Bar To Eviction Suit If Claim Is Based On Landlord-Tenant Relationship, Not Title Under Will: Bombay High Court Meritorious Candidate Wrongfully Denied Appointment Entitled To Notional Seniority & Old Pension Scheme: J&K & Ladakh High Court 6-Year Delay In Propounding Will & Hostile Attesting Witness Constitute 'Grave Suspicious Circumstances': Delhi High Court Refuses Probate Section 319 CrPC Power Cannot Be Exercised Based On FIR Or Section 161 Statements: Allahabad High Court Quashes Summoning Of Unmarried Sisters Bail Proceedings Cannot Be Converted Into Recovery Proceedings; Court Can't Order Sale Of Accused's Property: Supreme Court Able-Bodied Husband Cannot Defeat Maintenance Claim By Projecting Income Below Minimum Wages: Delhi High Court Recording Section 313 CrPC Statement Before Cross-Examination Of Prosecution Witness Does Not Vitiate Trial: Karnataka High Court Murder By Unknown Assailants Is Not 'Accidental Death' Under Mukhymantri Kisan Bima Yojna: Allahabad High Court Section 311 CrPC | Court Not A Passive Bystander, Must Summon Material Witness If Essential For Just Decision: Rajasthan High Court

Gauhati High Court Acquits Appellant in Landmark POCSO Case - Lack of Conclusive Age Evidence and Consensual Relationship

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Gauhati High Court acquitted the appellant in a case that challenged his conviction under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act). The judgment, delivered by Honourable Mrs. Justice Malasri Nandi on 8th August 2023, hinged on the pivotal aspect of age determination and its impact on the applicability of the POCSO Act.

The appellant, who was accused of engaging in a consensual sexual relationship that led to a pregnancy, was sentenced to a rigorous imprisonment of 10 years based on the lower court’s judgment. The victim’s age was a crucial element in this case, as the provisions of the POCSO Act apply to victims below 18 years of age.

Justice Nandi’s observations on age determination played a pivotal role in the acquittal. The radiological report indicated the victim’s age as 16 to 17 years, but the court took into consideration the margin of error of two years on either side for such assessments. The judge highlighted that “ossification test or other medical test, though a guiding factor, is not conclusive,” and that the benefit of doubt regarding age determination should be given to the accused.

“It is also a settled position that the benefit of doubt with regard to the age of the victim always goes in favor of the accused,” Justice Nandi emphasized. She further pointed out that the prosecution failed to adduce conclusive evidence regarding the victim’s age, including physical growth and secondary sexual characteristics, leaving ample room for doubt.

The court’s ruling rested on the principle that the prosecution had not proved beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was below 18 years of age at the time of the alleged incident. As a result, the provisions of the POCSO Act could not be invoked, and the consensual nature of the relationship further underscored the acquittal.

This landmark judgement not only highlights the importance of robust age determination procedures but also sheds light on the complexities of consensual relationships within the purview of the POCSO Act. Legal experts are lauding the Gauhati High Court’s thorough analysis of age determination evidence and its adherence to the principle of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ in cases of sexual offences involving minors.

Date of Decision: 08 August 2023 

SHIVA CHAUTAL UDALGURI, ASSAM. vs THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY PP, ASSAM.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/XXX_Vs_State_08Aug2023_Gauhati_HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News