Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

Gauhati High Court Acquits Appellant in Landmark POCSO Case - Lack of Conclusive Age Evidence and Consensual Relationship

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Gauhati High Court acquitted the appellant in a case that challenged his conviction under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act). The judgment, delivered by Honourable Mrs. Justice Malasri Nandi on 8th August 2023, hinged on the pivotal aspect of age determination and its impact on the applicability of the POCSO Act.

The appellant, who was accused of engaging in a consensual sexual relationship that led to a pregnancy, was sentenced to a rigorous imprisonment of 10 years based on the lower court’s judgment. The victim’s age was a crucial element in this case, as the provisions of the POCSO Act apply to victims below 18 years of age.

Justice Nandi’s observations on age determination played a pivotal role in the acquittal. The radiological report indicated the victim’s age as 16 to 17 years, but the court took into consideration the margin of error of two years on either side for such assessments. The judge highlighted that “ossification test or other medical test, though a guiding factor, is not conclusive,” and that the benefit of doubt regarding age determination should be given to the accused.

“It is also a settled position that the benefit of doubt with regard to the age of the victim always goes in favor of the accused,” Justice Nandi emphasized. She further pointed out that the prosecution failed to adduce conclusive evidence regarding the victim’s age, including physical growth and secondary sexual characteristics, leaving ample room for doubt.

The court’s ruling rested on the principle that the prosecution had not proved beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was below 18 years of age at the time of the alleged incident. As a result, the provisions of the POCSO Act could not be invoked, and the consensual nature of the relationship further underscored the acquittal.

This landmark judgement not only highlights the importance of robust age determination procedures but also sheds light on the complexities of consensual relationships within the purview of the POCSO Act. Legal experts are lauding the Gauhati High Court’s thorough analysis of age determination evidence and its adherence to the principle of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ in cases of sexual offences involving minors.

Date of Decision: 08 August 2023 

SHIVA CHAUTAL UDALGURI, ASSAM. vs THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY PP, ASSAM.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/XXX_Vs_State_08Aug2023_Gauhati_HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News