Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

For a Payment to Qualify as 'Fees for Technical Services' Under DTAA, It Must Entail Specialized, Customized, and Exclusive Technical Service  - Delhi High Court Quashes Order Against SFDC Ireland Limited

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a landmark judgment dated March 11, 2024, quashed the order and certification dated October 16 and 18, 2023, respectively, by the Commissioner of Income Tax, which denied a Nil withholding tax certificate to SFDC Ireland Limited. The Court remitted the matter for a fresh evaluation, focusing on whether the remittances constituted consideration for technical services under the India-Ireland Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).

Legal Point: The central legal issue revolved around the interpretation of "Fee for Technical Services" under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in relation to payments received by SFDC Ireland Limited from salesforce.com India Private Limited.

Facts and Issues: SFDC Ireland, engaged in providing cloud-based customer management platforms, entered into a Reseller Agreement with SFDC India. The payments received were subject to an application for a Nil withholding tax certificate, which was denied by the Commissioner, categorizing the remittances as 'Fee for Technical Services' under the DTAA.

Court’s Assessment: The Court meticulously examined the nature of services provided by SFDC Ireland and its relationship with SFDC India. It emphasized that for a payment to qualify as 'Fees for Technical Services' under the DTAA, it must entail specialized, customized, and exclusive technical service. The training and assistance provided were aligned more with enabling SFDC India to understand and market the products rather than being technical services.

Decision: The High Court instructed a fresh consideration of SFDC Ireland’s application, with an emphasis on the nature of technical services and the revenue structure of SFDC India. It was held that the denial of a Nil withholding tax certificate lacked a thorough examination of whether the remittances were indeed consideration for technical services.

Date of Decision: March 11, 2024

SFDC Ireland Limited vs Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr

Latest Legal News