Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

For a Payment to Qualify as 'Fees for Technical Services' Under DTAA, It Must Entail Specialized, Customized, and Exclusive Technical Service  - Delhi High Court Quashes Order Against SFDC Ireland Limited

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a landmark judgment dated March 11, 2024, quashed the order and certification dated October 16 and 18, 2023, respectively, by the Commissioner of Income Tax, which denied a Nil withholding tax certificate to SFDC Ireland Limited. The Court remitted the matter for a fresh evaluation, focusing on whether the remittances constituted consideration for technical services under the India-Ireland Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).

Legal Point: The central legal issue revolved around the interpretation of "Fee for Technical Services" under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in relation to payments received by SFDC Ireland Limited from salesforce.com India Private Limited.

Facts and Issues: SFDC Ireland, engaged in providing cloud-based customer management platforms, entered into a Reseller Agreement with SFDC India. The payments received were subject to an application for a Nil withholding tax certificate, which was denied by the Commissioner, categorizing the remittances as 'Fee for Technical Services' under the DTAA.

Court’s Assessment: The Court meticulously examined the nature of services provided by SFDC Ireland and its relationship with SFDC India. It emphasized that for a payment to qualify as 'Fees for Technical Services' under the DTAA, it must entail specialized, customized, and exclusive technical service. The training and assistance provided were aligned more with enabling SFDC India to understand and market the products rather than being technical services.

Decision: The High Court instructed a fresh consideration of SFDC Ireland’s application, with an emphasis on the nature of technical services and the revenue structure of SFDC India. It was held that the denial of a Nil withholding tax certificate lacked a thorough examination of whether the remittances were indeed consideration for technical services.

Date of Decision: March 11, 2024

SFDC Ireland Limited vs Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr

Latest Legal News