Bail Applicant Under Mandatory Obligation To Disclose Criminal Antecedents, Non-Disclosure Results In Erroneous Decisions: Andhra Pradesh High Court Judicial Decrees Cannot Be Set Aside By Administrative Orders After Decades; Long-Standing Revenue Entries Must Be Protected: Allahabad High Court 'Any Use Whatsoever' Includes Promotion & Events: Bombay High Court Restrains New Indian Express Group From Hosting Commercial Events Outside Southern States Reserved Category Candidates Who Qualify On Their Own Seniority Must Be Adjusted Against Unreserved Vacancies: Calcutta High Court Decree For Possession Can Be Passed If Landlord-Tenant Relationship & Termination Are Admitted; Unregistered Lease Is Month-To-Month: Delhi High Court Prosecution Against Co-Accused Not Sustainable When Main Accused Is Discharged On Same Facts: Jharkhand High Court Admission Of Handwriting On Account Statement Is Not Admission Of Its Contents; Corroborative Evidence Necessary To Prove Claim: Gujarat High Court Omission Of Label Defects In Food Inspector's Spot Memo Fatal To Prosecution For Misbranding: Himachal Pradesh High Court RBI Must Consult State Government, Not Just Registrar, To Supersede Co-operative Bank Board; Principles Of Natural Justice Excluded Under Section 36AAA: Kerala High Court Suit Filed Before IBC Proceedings Cannot Be Dismissed Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Section 96 Moratorium Only Stays Pending Actions: Calcutta High Court Senior Citizens Not Technologically Savvy Cannot Be Penalized For Not Checking Case Status On Court Website: Tripura High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Case Against CM Revanth Reddy Over 2019 Election Roadshow, Cites Bar Under Section 195 CrPC Maintenance Tribunal Orders Passed Without Mandated Three-Member Coram Are A Nullity: Punjab & Haryana High Court School Register Entry Regarding Date Of Birth Lacks Probative Value Unless Source Of Information Is Proved: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside POCSO Conviction Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court

FMGs Who Attended Online Classes Must Complete Two-Year Internship: Kerala High Court Upholds NMC’s Mandate for Ukraine-Trained Doctors

16 September 2025 2:16 PM

By: sayum


“Once Online Classes Were Attended, Two-Year CRMI Becomes Inevitable—Public Interest Outweighs Individual Grievances” - In a significant decision impacting hundreds of foreign medical graduates (FMGs) affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war, the Kerala High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by 27 MBBS graduates from Bukovinian State Medical University, Ukraine, seeking exemption from the two-year Compulsory Rotational Medical Internship (CRMI) mandate.

Justice N. Nagaresh held that the petitioners, having undergone online classes for any duration during their medical education, are bound to complete a two-year internship in India as per the National Medical Commission (NMC)'s binding guidelines.

“In view of the specific stand taken by the NMC... FMGs who have attended their classes online for any duration are required to qualify the FMG Examination and undergo CRMI for two/three years,” the Court observed, adding that the Kerala State Medical Council was justified in enforcing this requirement.

“Certificates Claiming Offline Compensation Are Unreliable”: Court Backs NMC’s Decision to Reject Foreign Declarations

The petitioners argued that they had attended physical, offline classes throughout their course, and presented certificates from Bukovinian State Medical University and Ukraine’s Ministry of Public Health to that effect. They relied on an earlier NMC public notice dated 19.06.2024, which permitted FMGs to undergo only one-year CRMI if they had “sufficiently compensated classes in physical onsite mode.”

However, the NMC later issued a clarificatory public notice on 07.06.2024, explicitly disallowing any such certificates from foreign medical universities, citing widespread misuse: “The National Medical Commission found that such certificates did not reflect the true facts and were being issued indiscriminately,” the Court noted.

Consequently, NMC issued Annexure R3(d) directing that any student who attended online classes for any duration must undergo a two/three-year internship. This was reiterated in the NMC’s Circular dated 09.05.2023, forming the basis for Kerala Medical Council's decision to issue provisional registration for a two-year internship only.

“Policy Framed in Public Interest Cannot Be Circumvented by Selective Enforcement”: Court Rejects Petitioners' Equivalence Argument

The petitioners placed on record multiple certificates (Exhibits P5 to P22) to show that other State Medical Councils like those in Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, Gujarat, Delhi, Himachal Pradesh, Goa, and Rajasthan had granted one-year CRMI based on the same documents.

But the Kerala High Court refused to allow this “selective implementation” as a ground to invalidate the NMC’s policy:

“The 3rd respondent has only followed the directions of the NMC. The decision has been taken on the basis of larger public interest,” said Justice Nagaresh.

The Court held that individual State Councils wrongly granting one-year CRMI cannot bind or override the centrally mandated policy, especially when the petitioners had already accepted provisional registration clearly stating that the certificate was valid for two years of internship.

“The petitioners are now trying to circumvent the conditions in the certificate,” the Court remarked, rejecting the argument that they were unfairly discriminated against.

“No Merit in the Writ Petition”: High Court Declines to Interfere With Uniform CRMI Policy

Justice Nagaresh emphasized that the policy requiring two-year CRMI was created in response to an extraordinary global situation, and thus, medical graduates from foreign institutions during 2016–2022 had to comply.

“It is not in dispute that the petitioners had their course period when Covid-19 pandemic and Russia-Ukraine war occurred. The petitioners had admittedly undergone online classes during their course period,” the Court concluded.

With these observations, the Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the NMC’s directive and Kerala Medical Council’s compliance with the same.

Date of Decision: 15.09.2025

Latest Legal News