Auction Purchaser Has No Vested Right Without Sale Confirmation: Calcutta HC Upholds Borrower’s Redemption Right Under Pre-Amendment SARFAESI Law Identification Without TIP, Electronic Records Without 65B Certificate – Conviction Set Aside: Patna High Court Nothing Inflicts A Deeper Wound On Our Constitutional Culture Than A State Official Running Berserk Regardless Of Human Rights: Jharkhand High Court Orders ₹1.5 Lakh Interim Compensation Dishonour Due to ‘Account Blocked’ Not Attributable to Drawer—No Offence Under Section 138 NI Act: Delhi High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Cannot Be Rebutted By Mere Assertions: Delhi High Court Affirms Conviction In 32-Year-Old Cheque Bounce Case Signature Alone Doesn’t Prove Debt: Kerala High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case, Rejects Blanket Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Justice Cannot Be Left to Guesswork: Supreme Court Mandates Structured Judgments in Criminal Trials Across India Truth Must Be Proven Beyond Doubt—Not Built On Flawed FIRs, Tainted Witnesses And Investigative Gaps: Supreme Court Acquits Man in POCSO Rape-Murder Case Once parties agree and reconciliation is impossible, a fault-based decree is unnecessary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Divorce on Desertion No Escape from Statutory Ceiling: Exclusive Expenditure by Foreign Head Offices Also Attracts Section 44C Income Tax: Supreme Court Loss Of A Child Cannot Be Calculated In Rupees, But Law Must At Least Offer Dignity In Compensation: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation Sessions Court Cannot Direct Life Imprisonment Till Natural Life Without Remission: Supreme Court Reasserts Limits on Sentencing Powers of Subordinate Courts ‘Continuously Means Without a Single Break’: Supreme Court Bars Expired-and-Renewed Licences From Police Driver Recruitment Chief Justice’s Power Under Section 51(3) Is Independent and Continuing: Supreme Court Upholds Kolhapur Bench Notification Last Seen Evidence Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case No Cultivation on Forest Land Without Central Clearance: Supreme Court Cancels Lease Over 134 Acres, Orders Reforestation Appointment from Rank List Must Respect Communal Rotation: SC Declines Claim of SC Waitlisted Candidate After Resignation of Appointee Supreme Court Dissolves 20-Year Estranged Marriage Under Article 142 Despite Wife’s Objection Murder Inside Temple Cannot Be Treated Lightly: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Father-Son Convicts in Group Killing Case

FMGs Who Attended Online Classes Must Complete Two-Year Internship: Kerala High Court Upholds NMC’s Mandate for Ukraine-Trained Doctors

16 September 2025 2:16 PM

By: sayum


“Once Online Classes Were Attended, Two-Year CRMI Becomes Inevitable—Public Interest Outweighs Individual Grievances” - In a significant decision impacting hundreds of foreign medical graduates (FMGs) affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war, the Kerala High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by 27 MBBS graduates from Bukovinian State Medical University, Ukraine, seeking exemption from the two-year Compulsory Rotational Medical Internship (CRMI) mandate.

Justice N. Nagaresh held that the petitioners, having undergone online classes for any duration during their medical education, are bound to complete a two-year internship in India as per the National Medical Commission (NMC)'s binding guidelines.

“In view of the specific stand taken by the NMC... FMGs who have attended their classes online for any duration are required to qualify the FMG Examination and undergo CRMI for two/three years,” the Court observed, adding that the Kerala State Medical Council was justified in enforcing this requirement.

“Certificates Claiming Offline Compensation Are Unreliable”: Court Backs NMC’s Decision to Reject Foreign Declarations

The petitioners argued that they had attended physical, offline classes throughout their course, and presented certificates from Bukovinian State Medical University and Ukraine’s Ministry of Public Health to that effect. They relied on an earlier NMC public notice dated 19.06.2024, which permitted FMGs to undergo only one-year CRMI if they had “sufficiently compensated classes in physical onsite mode.”

However, the NMC later issued a clarificatory public notice on 07.06.2024, explicitly disallowing any such certificates from foreign medical universities, citing widespread misuse: “The National Medical Commission found that such certificates did not reflect the true facts and were being issued indiscriminately,” the Court noted.

Consequently, NMC issued Annexure R3(d) directing that any student who attended online classes for any duration must undergo a two/three-year internship. This was reiterated in the NMC’s Circular dated 09.05.2023, forming the basis for Kerala Medical Council's decision to issue provisional registration for a two-year internship only.

“Policy Framed in Public Interest Cannot Be Circumvented by Selective Enforcement”: Court Rejects Petitioners' Equivalence Argument

The petitioners placed on record multiple certificates (Exhibits P5 to P22) to show that other State Medical Councils like those in Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, Gujarat, Delhi, Himachal Pradesh, Goa, and Rajasthan had granted one-year CRMI based on the same documents.

But the Kerala High Court refused to allow this “selective implementation” as a ground to invalidate the NMC’s policy:

“The 3rd respondent has only followed the directions of the NMC. The decision has been taken on the basis of larger public interest,” said Justice Nagaresh.

The Court held that individual State Councils wrongly granting one-year CRMI cannot bind or override the centrally mandated policy, especially when the petitioners had already accepted provisional registration clearly stating that the certificate was valid for two years of internship.

“The petitioners are now trying to circumvent the conditions in the certificate,” the Court remarked, rejecting the argument that they were unfairly discriminated against.

“No Merit in the Writ Petition”: High Court Declines to Interfere With Uniform CRMI Policy

Justice Nagaresh emphasized that the policy requiring two-year CRMI was created in response to an extraordinary global situation, and thus, medical graduates from foreign institutions during 2016–2022 had to comply.

“It is not in dispute that the petitioners had their course period when Covid-19 pandemic and Russia-Ukraine war occurred. The petitioners had admittedly undergone online classes during their course period,” the Court concluded.

With these observations, the Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the NMC’s directive and Kerala Medical Council’s compliance with the same.

Date of Decision: 15.09.2025

Latest Legal News