Employees Handling Public Money Expected To Maintain Highest Standards Of Integrity: Telangana High Court Upholds Dismissal Of Bank Manager Over Financial Irregularities No Specific Direction In Writ Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses To Initiate Contempt Against State For Non-Framing Of Rules 'DNA Report Not Conclusive Proof Of Absence Of Consent': J&K High Court Grants Bail To Accused In POCSO Case After Prosecutrix Turns Hostile Mere Knowledge Is Not A Crime: Karnataka High Court Quashes Charges Against Homestay Owner For Not Reporting Guest's Sexual Assault Bypassing DRT Strongly Deprecated: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Writ Challenging SARFAESI Notices, Reaffirms Bar Under Article 226 Tenant Cannot Induct Stranger And Claim Permission': MP High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Subtenant Landlord Must Produce Concrete Evidence To Establish Genuineness Of 'Bonafide Need'; Oral Testimony Not Sufficient: Kerala High Court Cannot Change Rules Of The Game Mid-Way: Calcutta High Court Quashes Refusal To Approve Selection Process Initiated Under 2005 Rules Joint Petitions Seeking Individual Relief Must Pay Court Fees 'Per Petitioner': Bombay High Court 'Body Found Severed In Multiple Pieces Doesn't Conclusively Prove Trespass': Allahabad High Court Awards ₹8 Lakh In Railway Untoward Incident Case POCSO | Cannot Apply 2019 Amendment Retrospectively: Supreme Court Restores Life Imprisonment In Child Rape Case Equivalence Of Pay Scale Doesn't Mean You Can Leapfrog: Supreme Court Restricts Scope Of Absorption For Surplus Employees Supreme Court Raps State Over Illegal Delegation Of Power: 'Statutory Duty Of Government Cannot Be Abdicated To Subordinate Officers' Natural Justice Is Not An Unruly Horse: Supreme Court Overturns HC Order Quashing Teacher's Termination Over Invalid B.Ed. Degree Order XLI Rule 27 CPC | Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order For Failing To Decide Application For Additional Evidence Criminal Proceedings Not A Recovery Mechanism: Supreme Court Quashes Complaint Used As Arm-Twisting Tactic Review Is Not An Appeal: Supreme Court Sets Aside Order Where High Court Reheard Case Under Guise Of Review Jurisdiction Filing Lawsuits Is A Statutory Right: Supreme Court Refuses To Term PepsiCo's Infringement Actions Against Farmers As 'Predatory'

FMGs Who Attended Online Classes Must Complete Two-Year Internship: Kerala High Court Upholds NMC’s Mandate for Ukraine-Trained Doctors

16 September 2025 2:16 PM

By: sayum


“Once Online Classes Were Attended, Two-Year CRMI Becomes Inevitable—Public Interest Outweighs Individual Grievances” - In a significant decision impacting hundreds of foreign medical graduates (FMGs) affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war, the Kerala High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by 27 MBBS graduates from Bukovinian State Medical University, Ukraine, seeking exemption from the two-year Compulsory Rotational Medical Internship (CRMI) mandate.

Justice N. Nagaresh held that the petitioners, having undergone online classes for any duration during their medical education, are bound to complete a two-year internship in India as per the National Medical Commission (NMC)'s binding guidelines.

“In view of the specific stand taken by the NMC... FMGs who have attended their classes online for any duration are required to qualify the FMG Examination and undergo CRMI for two/three years,” the Court observed, adding that the Kerala State Medical Council was justified in enforcing this requirement.

“Certificates Claiming Offline Compensation Are Unreliable”: Court Backs NMC’s Decision to Reject Foreign Declarations

The petitioners argued that they had attended physical, offline classes throughout their course, and presented certificates from Bukovinian State Medical University and Ukraine’s Ministry of Public Health to that effect. They relied on an earlier NMC public notice dated 19.06.2024, which permitted FMGs to undergo only one-year CRMI if they had “sufficiently compensated classes in physical onsite mode.”

However, the NMC later issued a clarificatory public notice on 07.06.2024, explicitly disallowing any such certificates from foreign medical universities, citing widespread misuse: “The National Medical Commission found that such certificates did not reflect the true facts and were being issued indiscriminately,” the Court noted.

Consequently, NMC issued Annexure R3(d) directing that any student who attended online classes for any duration must undergo a two/three-year internship. This was reiterated in the NMC’s Circular dated 09.05.2023, forming the basis for Kerala Medical Council's decision to issue provisional registration for a two-year internship only.

“Policy Framed in Public Interest Cannot Be Circumvented by Selective Enforcement”: Court Rejects Petitioners' Equivalence Argument

The petitioners placed on record multiple certificates (Exhibits P5 to P22) to show that other State Medical Councils like those in Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, Gujarat, Delhi, Himachal Pradesh, Goa, and Rajasthan had granted one-year CRMI based on the same documents.

But the Kerala High Court refused to allow this “selective implementation” as a ground to invalidate the NMC’s policy:

“The 3rd respondent has only followed the directions of the NMC. The decision has been taken on the basis of larger public interest,” said Justice Nagaresh.

The Court held that individual State Councils wrongly granting one-year CRMI cannot bind or override the centrally mandated policy, especially when the petitioners had already accepted provisional registration clearly stating that the certificate was valid for two years of internship.

“The petitioners are now trying to circumvent the conditions in the certificate,” the Court remarked, rejecting the argument that they were unfairly discriminated against.

“No Merit in the Writ Petition”: High Court Declines to Interfere With Uniform CRMI Policy

Justice Nagaresh emphasized that the policy requiring two-year CRMI was created in response to an extraordinary global situation, and thus, medical graduates from foreign institutions during 2016–2022 had to comply.

“It is not in dispute that the petitioners had their course period when Covid-19 pandemic and Russia-Ukraine war occurred. The petitioners had admittedly undergone online classes during their course period,” the Court concluded.

With these observations, the Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the NMC’s directive and Kerala Medical Council’s compliance with the same.

Date of Decision: 15.09.2025

Latest Legal News