Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Failed To Prove Shared Household: Delhi High Court Dismisses Appeal for Residence Right in Domestic Violence Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal filed by an appellant-wife seeking the right of residence in a property considered as a shared household. The Court, in its judgement dated January 25, 2024, upheld the Family Court’s decision, stating that there was “no error in the Family Court’s judgement” (Para 32), thereby rejecting the appellant’s claim.

The case, Identified as MAT.APP.(F.C.) 80/2023 & CM APPL.14336/2023, involved the appellant-wife Sonia Khurana challenging the Family Court’s verdict which had dismissed her application for residence rights under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act). The marriage between Sonia Khurana and Pradeep Khurana was solemnized on August 29, 1999, and the dispute revolved around the residence in a property post their separation.

The High Court meticulously analyzed the definition of 'shared household' under the DV Act. The bench, comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, observed, “What is ‘shared household’ has been defined in Section 2(s) of the DV Act…” (Para 24). The Court further elaborated that the appellant had not established that the disputed property was a shared household.

In regards to maintenance and child support, the High Court noted that the respondent had been paying Rs. 75,000/- per month for the maintenance and education of the children and the appellant. The Court observed, “the appellant is getting maintenance which may be able to account for her expenses for the house…” (Para 29-30).

The ruling has significant implications in cases involving claims of residence rights under the DV Act. The Delhi High Court’s decision underscores the importance of clear legal definitions and the need for concrete evidence to substantiate claims in domestic violence cases.

This judgement serves as a precedent in clarifying the application of the DV Act in residence rights disputes and highlights the Court’s approach in dealing with such complex issues.

The appeal was ultimately dismissed by the High Court, concluding that the Family Court’s decision did not warrant interference, thus setting a crucial legal precedent in cases of domestic violence and residence rights.

Date of Decision: January 25, 2024

Sonia Khurana VS Pradeep Khurana

Latest Legal News