Wife Not Entitled to Maintenance When Financially Secure and Dishonest: Punjab & Haryana High Court Boycott of Courts Violates Litigants’ Right to Speedy Justice: Rajasthan High Court Slams Lawyers' Strike Over Working Saturdays Order VI Rule 17 CPC | Proviso Cannot Defeat the Main Provision Which Allows Amendment ‘At Any Stage of Proceedings’: Karnataka High Court Knife Used To Enlarge Child’s Vagina Before Rape: Madhya Pradesh High Court Affirms Death Sentence In ‘Rarest Of Rare’ Case 47 BNSS | Mere Mention of Offence and Sections Is Not Disclosure of Grounds of Arrest: Allahabad High Court Quashes Arrest for Failure to Furnish Written Grounds Quasi-Judicial Officers Aren’t Criminals For Passing Orders: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Against Executive Officer In Mutation Dispute Sections 215 & 379 BNSS | Police Cannot Register FIR Without Judicial Satisfaction Where Alleged Offence Relates to Court Proceedings: Madhya Pradesh High Court Magistrate Empowered To Try Drug Offence Under Section 27(d) Despite It Falling Under Chapter IV: J&K High Court Information Commission Has No Power To Impose Blanket Ban On RTI Applications: Orissa High Court Strikes Down Restriction On Filing Future RTIs Anticipatory Bail Is Not a Shield for Crimes That Threaten Communal Harmony: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Bail Plea in Beef Possession Case Drug And Cosmetic Act | Sample Testing Must Be Completed Within 60 Days Under Rule 45 – Delay Vitiates Entire Prosecution: Bombay High Court 156(3) CrPC | Handwriting Expert's Report May Not Be Final – But It’s Sufficient to Initiate Investigation: Delhi High Court 217 CrPC | Alteration of Charges Is Not a Mere Formality: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Dowry Death Conviction Maintenance Is Not a Charity, It's an Implied Right: Chhattisgarh High Court Cancels Gift Deed for Denial of Care to Elderly Donors Minor Inconsistencies Can't Overturn Disability Claims: Bombay High Court imposes ₹2 lakh costs on HDFC Justice Must Not Be a Casualty of Clerical Oversight: AP High Court Last Seen Is Not Last Word – Circumstantial Evidence Must Be Complete and Compelling: Allahabad High Court Nomination Has Sanctity—Succession Certificate Not Mandatory When Valid Nominee Exists: Supreme Court in GPF Dispute

Failed To Prove – Proving Employer-Employee Relationship – Delhi High Court Upholds Dismissal of Compensation Claim in Employee Death Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi High Court, in a significant judgment delivered by Justice Dharmesh Sharma on November 21, upheld the dismissal of a compensation claim under the Employee Compensation Act, 1923, involving the death of Brij Kishore Gupta @ Brij Kishore Sah. The court emphasized the necessity of establishing a clear employer-employee relationship for such claims to be valid.

In the case of Neelu Kumari & Ors. Vs. OM & Anr (Bajaj Alliance Gen Ins Co Ltd), the appellants sought compensation following the death of Brij Kishore, who was allegedly an employee of the respondent No.1 and died while plying vehicle TSR No. DL-lRF-0941. The claim was initially dismissed by the Labour Commissioner due to insufficient evidence proving an employer-employee relationship.

“The initial burden of proving employer and employee relationship was upon the appellants/claimants, which was not discharged,” observed Justice Sharma in his judgment. This finding was critical in the High Court’s decision to dismiss the appeal.

While the High Court concurred with the Labour Commissioner on the primary issue, it did note a legal discrepancy in the interpretation of the Employee Compensation Act in cases of murder during employment. Justice Sharma stated, “However, only from an academic point of view, the finding by the Commissioner that murder of an employee during the course of performance of his duties would not bring the case within the ambit of Section 2(1)(n) of the E.C. Act, is flawed.”

This observation sheds light on the broader legal principles involved in employee compensation claims, particularly in cases involving the death of an employee under extraordinary circumstances.

The court’s decision has significant implications for similar compensation claims under the Employee Compensation Act, underscoring the criticality of proving an employer-employee relationship and correctly interpreting the scope of the Act in various scenarios.

Date of Decision: 21st November 2023

NEELU KUMARI & ORS. VS OM & ANR (BAJAJ ALLIANCE GEN INS CO LTD) 

Latest Legal News