Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Failed To Prove – Proving Employer-Employee Relationship – Delhi High Court Upholds Dismissal of Compensation Claim in Employee Death Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi High Court, in a significant judgment delivered by Justice Dharmesh Sharma on November 21, upheld the dismissal of a compensation claim under the Employee Compensation Act, 1923, involving the death of Brij Kishore Gupta @ Brij Kishore Sah. The court emphasized the necessity of establishing a clear employer-employee relationship for such claims to be valid.

In the case of Neelu Kumari & Ors. Vs. OM & Anr (Bajaj Alliance Gen Ins Co Ltd), the appellants sought compensation following the death of Brij Kishore, who was allegedly an employee of the respondent No.1 and died while plying vehicle TSR No. DL-lRF-0941. The claim was initially dismissed by the Labour Commissioner due to insufficient evidence proving an employer-employee relationship.

“The initial burden of proving employer and employee relationship was upon the appellants/claimants, which was not discharged,” observed Justice Sharma in his judgment. This finding was critical in the High Court’s decision to dismiss the appeal.

While the High Court concurred with the Labour Commissioner on the primary issue, it did note a legal discrepancy in the interpretation of the Employee Compensation Act in cases of murder during employment. Justice Sharma stated, “However, only from an academic point of view, the finding by the Commissioner that murder of an employee during the course of performance of his duties would not bring the case within the ambit of Section 2(1)(n) of the E.C. Act, is flawed.”

This observation sheds light on the broader legal principles involved in employee compensation claims, particularly in cases involving the death of an employee under extraordinary circumstances.

The court’s decision has significant implications for similar compensation claims under the Employee Compensation Act, underscoring the criticality of proving an employer-employee relationship and correctly interpreting the scope of the Act in various scenarios.

Date of Decision: 21st November 2023

NEELU KUMARI & ORS. VS OM & ANR (BAJAJ ALLIANCE GEN INS CO LTD) 

Latest Legal News