Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Extreme Cruelty and Parental Alienation Recognized in Granting Divorce, Delhi High Court Condemns Involvement of Minor in Marital Disputes

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court recognized the act of involving a minor child in marital disputes and making unsubstantiated allegations of adultery as acts of extreme cruelty and a form of parental alienation, in a divorce case under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Facts and Issues: Kanwal Kishore Girdhar filed a divorce petition against Seema Girdhar on grounds of cruelty, alleging several instances of harassment and involvement of their minor daughter in marital conflicts. The couple, married since 1998, faced ongoing marital discord, leading to several legal disputes and physical altercations. Seema Girdhar was accused of making false allegations, not contributing to household expenses, and involving their minor daughter in disputes.

Involvement of Minor Child: Justice Neena Bansal Krishna emphasized, "igniting animosity and hostility in the minor child... is not only an act of extreme cruelty to the father but also gross inhumanity to the child." The court viewed this as a serious concern, referencing Kerala High Court case law on parental alienation.

Lack of Effort for Reconciliation: The court noted the non-reconciliatory attitude of the respondent and her refusal to engage in matrimonial reconciliation. The court observed that this contributed to the mental cruelty experienced by the appellant.

Allegations of Adultery: The court found the respondent's unsubstantiated allegations of adultery against the appellant to be acts of mental cruelty. The involvement of their minor child in such allegations was particularly condemned.

Continued Separation: The court acknowledged the long separation since 2006, with no effective reconciliation attempts, further contributing to the conclusion of cruelty.

Decision: The court set aside the judgment dated 19.10.2018 and granted a decree of divorce in favor of the appellant, Kanwal Kishore Girdhar, under Section 13 (i) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on the grounds of cruelty.

Date of Decision: February 28, 2024

xxx vs xxx

Latest Legal News