Bail Applicant Under Mandatory Obligation To Disclose Criminal Antecedents, Non-Disclosure Results In Erroneous Decisions: Andhra Pradesh High Court Judicial Decrees Cannot Be Set Aside By Administrative Orders After Decades; Long-Standing Revenue Entries Must Be Protected: Allahabad High Court 'Any Use Whatsoever' Includes Promotion & Events: Bombay High Court Restrains New Indian Express Group From Hosting Commercial Events Outside Southern States Reserved Category Candidates Who Qualify On Their Own Seniority Must Be Adjusted Against Unreserved Vacancies: Calcutta High Court Decree For Possession Can Be Passed If Landlord-Tenant Relationship & Termination Are Admitted; Unregistered Lease Is Month-To-Month: Delhi High Court Prosecution Against Co-Accused Not Sustainable When Main Accused Is Discharged On Same Facts: Jharkhand High Court Admission Of Handwriting On Account Statement Is Not Admission Of Its Contents; Corroborative Evidence Necessary To Prove Claim: Gujarat High Court Omission Of Label Defects In Food Inspector's Spot Memo Fatal To Prosecution For Misbranding: Himachal Pradesh High Court RBI Must Consult State Government, Not Just Registrar, To Supersede Co-operative Bank Board; Principles Of Natural Justice Excluded Under Section 36AAA: Kerala High Court Suit Filed Before IBC Proceedings Cannot Be Dismissed Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Section 96 Moratorium Only Stays Pending Actions: Calcutta High Court Senior Citizens Not Technologically Savvy Cannot Be Penalized For Not Checking Case Status On Court Website: Tripura High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Case Against CM Revanth Reddy Over 2019 Election Roadshow, Cites Bar Under Section 195 CrPC Maintenance Tribunal Orders Passed Without Mandated Three-Member Coram Are A Nullity: Punjab & Haryana High Court School Register Entry Regarding Date Of Birth Lacks Probative Value Unless Source Of Information Is Proved: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside POCSO Conviction Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Will | Disinheriting Caring Spouse In Favour Of Non-Relatives Is An ‘Unnatural Disposition’ Raising Grave Suspicion: Supreme Court Registration Does Not Automatically Validate Will If Process Is Shrouded In Suspicion; Testator's Illiteracy Increases Burden On Propounder: Supreme Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court

Extreme Cruelty and Parental Alienation Recognized in Granting Divorce, Delhi High Court Condemns Involvement of Minor in Marital Disputes

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court recognized the act of involving a minor child in marital disputes and making unsubstantiated allegations of adultery as acts of extreme cruelty and a form of parental alienation, in a divorce case under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Facts and Issues: Kanwal Kishore Girdhar filed a divorce petition against Seema Girdhar on grounds of cruelty, alleging several instances of harassment and involvement of their minor daughter in marital conflicts. The couple, married since 1998, faced ongoing marital discord, leading to several legal disputes and physical altercations. Seema Girdhar was accused of making false allegations, not contributing to household expenses, and involving their minor daughter in disputes.

Involvement of Minor Child: Justice Neena Bansal Krishna emphasized, "igniting animosity and hostility in the minor child... is not only an act of extreme cruelty to the father but also gross inhumanity to the child." The court viewed this as a serious concern, referencing Kerala High Court case law on parental alienation.

Lack of Effort for Reconciliation: The court noted the non-reconciliatory attitude of the respondent and her refusal to engage in matrimonial reconciliation. The court observed that this contributed to the mental cruelty experienced by the appellant.

Allegations of Adultery: The court found the respondent's unsubstantiated allegations of adultery against the appellant to be acts of mental cruelty. The involvement of their minor child in such allegations was particularly condemned.

Continued Separation: The court acknowledged the long separation since 2006, with no effective reconciliation attempts, further contributing to the conclusion of cruelty.

Decision: The court set aside the judgment dated 19.10.2018 and granted a decree of divorce in favor of the appellant, Kanwal Kishore Girdhar, under Section 13 (i) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on the grounds of cruelty.

Date of Decision: February 28, 2024

xxx vs xxx

Latest Legal News