Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

Extreme Cruelty and Parental Alienation Recognized in Granting Divorce, Delhi High Court Condemns Involvement of Minor in Marital Disputes

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court recognized the act of involving a minor child in marital disputes and making unsubstantiated allegations of adultery as acts of extreme cruelty and a form of parental alienation, in a divorce case under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Facts and Issues: Kanwal Kishore Girdhar filed a divorce petition against Seema Girdhar on grounds of cruelty, alleging several instances of harassment and involvement of their minor daughter in marital conflicts. The couple, married since 1998, faced ongoing marital discord, leading to several legal disputes and physical altercations. Seema Girdhar was accused of making false allegations, not contributing to household expenses, and involving their minor daughter in disputes.

Involvement of Minor Child: Justice Neena Bansal Krishna emphasized, "igniting animosity and hostility in the minor child... is not only an act of extreme cruelty to the father but also gross inhumanity to the child." The court viewed this as a serious concern, referencing Kerala High Court case law on parental alienation.

Lack of Effort for Reconciliation: The court noted the non-reconciliatory attitude of the respondent and her refusal to engage in matrimonial reconciliation. The court observed that this contributed to the mental cruelty experienced by the appellant.

Allegations of Adultery: The court found the respondent's unsubstantiated allegations of adultery against the appellant to be acts of mental cruelty. The involvement of their minor child in such allegations was particularly condemned.

Continued Separation: The court acknowledged the long separation since 2006, with no effective reconciliation attempts, further contributing to the conclusion of cruelty.

Decision: The court set aside the judgment dated 19.10.2018 and granted a decree of divorce in favor of the appellant, Kanwal Kishore Girdhar, under Section 13 (i) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on the grounds of cruelty.

Date of Decision: February 28, 2024

xxx vs xxx

Latest Legal News