Conviction Under Section 409 IPC Postulates Strict Proof Of Entrustment; Suspicion However Grave Cannot Substitute Proof: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Emanating From Past Matrimonial Relationship Ought Not To Linger After Divorce: Supreme Court Negligence Of Previous Counsel Not A Ground To Reopen Concluded Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell Cannot Protect Tenant's Possession Under Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Registered Sale Deeds Admissible As Secondary Evidence Without Proving Loss Of Original: Gauhati High Court Counsel Representing Deceased Party Must Inform Court Of Death Under Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC: J&K High Court Son Staying In Father's House Out Of Love And Affection Is A Mere Licensee, Cannot Challenge Father's Title: Delhi High Court Conviction For Murder Cannot Stand Where Single Blow Inflicted In Sudden Fight Without Premeditation: Uttarakhand High Court Inability To Trace Suppliers Or Buyers No Ground For Custodial Interrogation Once Recovery Is Effected: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Assemble Peacefully To Celebrate Association Anniversary Is A Fundamental Right; Unlawful Assembly Per Se Not An Offence: Madras High Court Marriage Photographs Can Be Relied Upon To Estimate Quantity Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes: Kerala High Court POCSO Act Not Confined To Securing Convictions, Soul Of Law Lies In Preserving Childhood Dignity & Healing: Madras High Court Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court

Extension beyond 90 days should be exceptional: Last Opportunity for Written Statement Filing: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Namit Kumar, has granted a final opportunity to the petitioners in CR No.7117 of 2023, Gurvail Singh and another vs Gurwinder Singh and others, to file their written statement. This ruling comes as a relief to the petitioners whose defense was previously struck off due to the non-filing of a written statement within the prescribed 90-day period.

The Court's decision, delivered on November 28, 2023, has been pivotal in interpreting the procedural mandates of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), specifically Order 8, Rule 1. Justice Kumar, in his observation, emphasized the balance between procedural law and the dispensation of justice, stating, “The provisions of Order 8, Rule 1 of CPC, though directory, should ordinarily be adhered to.” This highlights the Court’s stance on maintaining the integrity of legal procedures while ensuring fairness.

The judgment has been a topic of much discussion among legal circles for its nuanced approach towards procedural defaults. The Court noted, “Extension beyond 90 days should be exceptional and for reasons recorded in writing.” This statement underlines the need for strict adherence to timelines in legal proceedings, while also acknowledging the possibility of exceptions in extraordinary circumstances.

The petitioners were represented by Mr. Kanwar Pahul Singh, Advocate, who argued that the delay in filing the written statement was neither intentional nor deliberate. Acknowledging this, the Court has allowed the petitioners a final chance to submit their statement, subject to a cost penalty, thereby preventing what could have been a significant procedural injustice.

This ruling is seen as a reinforcement of the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in various precedents, where the procedural laws are considered directory but necessitate compliance to ensure swift and efficient judicial processes.

Date of Decision: 28th November 2023

GURVAIL SINGH AND ANOTHER VS GURWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS

Latest Legal News