Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Extension beyond 90 days should be exceptional: Last Opportunity for Written Statement Filing: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Namit Kumar, has granted a final opportunity to the petitioners in CR No.7117 of 2023, Gurvail Singh and another vs Gurwinder Singh and others, to file their written statement. This ruling comes as a relief to the petitioners whose defense was previously struck off due to the non-filing of a written statement within the prescribed 90-day period.

The Court's decision, delivered on November 28, 2023, has been pivotal in interpreting the procedural mandates of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), specifically Order 8, Rule 1. Justice Kumar, in his observation, emphasized the balance between procedural law and the dispensation of justice, stating, “The provisions of Order 8, Rule 1 of CPC, though directory, should ordinarily be adhered to.” This highlights the Court’s stance on maintaining the integrity of legal procedures while ensuring fairness.

The judgment has been a topic of much discussion among legal circles for its nuanced approach towards procedural defaults. The Court noted, “Extension beyond 90 days should be exceptional and for reasons recorded in writing.” This statement underlines the need for strict adherence to timelines in legal proceedings, while also acknowledging the possibility of exceptions in extraordinary circumstances.

The petitioners were represented by Mr. Kanwar Pahul Singh, Advocate, who argued that the delay in filing the written statement was neither intentional nor deliberate. Acknowledging this, the Court has allowed the petitioners a final chance to submit their statement, subject to a cost penalty, thereby preventing what could have been a significant procedural injustice.

This ruling is seen as a reinforcement of the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in various precedents, where the procedural laws are considered directory but necessitate compliance to ensure swift and efficient judicial processes.

Date of Decision: 28th November 2023

GURVAIL SINGH AND ANOTHER VS GURWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS

Latest Legal News