Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

EXCLUSION OF NATURAL HEIRS IN A WILL NOT RAISE SUSPICION, EXCLUDING DAUGHTERS FROM INHERITANCE – P&H HC

03 September 2024 10:27 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided by Mrs. Alka Sarin, J., has dismissed an appeal while affirming the validity of a will that excludes daughters from inheritance. The judgment, delivered on 31st May 2022, emphasizes that the exclusion of natural heirs in a will does not raise suspicion, citing the precedent set in the case of Ramabai Padamakar Patil (D) through LRs. V. Rukminibai Vishnu Vekhande.

In her judgment, Mrs. Alka Sarin, J., stated, “Merely because the daughters of the Testator have been left out from the Will is not sufficient ground to discard it.” The court’s reference to the aforementioned precedent establishes the principle that the exclusion of natural heirs in a will is not inherently suspicious.

The dispute centered around the estate left behind by Sat Narayan, with the plaintiffs asserting that the properties in question were ancestral and seeking a declaration of their rights. Conversely, the defendant presented a will executed by Sat Narayan, which excluded the daughters from inheritance.

By upholding the validity of the will, the High Court has underscored the importance of proving the ancestral nature of properties in such disputes. This ruling serves as a significant precedent for future cases involving wills and inheritance rights, emphasizing that the exclusion of natural heirs does not in itself cast doubt on the validity of a will.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court’s decision clarifies the legal position, ensuring that the intentions of the testator are respected while settling disputes over ancestral property and inheritance rights.

Date of Decision: 31.05.2022.

Smt. Sunita Devi vs Smt. Shalu Devi and Ors.

 

Latest Legal News