"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

EXCLUSION OF NATURAL HEIRS IN A WILL NOT RAISE SUSPICION, EXCLUDING DAUGHTERS FROM INHERITANCE – P&H HC

03 September 2024 10:27 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided by Mrs. Alka Sarin, J., has dismissed an appeal while affirming the validity of a will that excludes daughters from inheritance. The judgment, delivered on 31st May 2022, emphasizes that the exclusion of natural heirs in a will does not raise suspicion, citing the precedent set in the case of Ramabai Padamakar Patil (D) through LRs. V. Rukminibai Vishnu Vekhande.

In her judgment, Mrs. Alka Sarin, J., stated, “Merely because the daughters of the Testator have been left out from the Will is not sufficient ground to discard it.” The court’s reference to the aforementioned precedent establishes the principle that the exclusion of natural heirs in a will is not inherently suspicious.

The dispute centered around the estate left behind by Sat Narayan, with the plaintiffs asserting that the properties in question were ancestral and seeking a declaration of their rights. Conversely, the defendant presented a will executed by Sat Narayan, which excluded the daughters from inheritance.

By upholding the validity of the will, the High Court has underscored the importance of proving the ancestral nature of properties in such disputes. This ruling serves as a significant precedent for future cases involving wills and inheritance rights, emphasizing that the exclusion of natural heirs does not in itself cast doubt on the validity of a will.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court’s decision clarifies the legal position, ensuring that the intentions of the testator are respected while settling disputes over ancestral property and inheritance rights.

Date of Decision: 31.05.2022.

Smt. Sunita Devi vs Smt. Shalu Devi and Ors.

 

Similar News