MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

EXCLUSION OF NATURAL HEIRS IN A WILL NOT RAISE SUSPICION, EXCLUDING DAUGHTERS FROM INHERITANCE – P&H HC

03 September 2024 10:27 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided by Mrs. Alka Sarin, J., has dismissed an appeal while affirming the validity of a will that excludes daughters from inheritance. The judgment, delivered on 31st May 2022, emphasizes that the exclusion of natural heirs in a will does not raise suspicion, citing the precedent set in the case of Ramabai Padamakar Patil (D) through LRs. V. Rukminibai Vishnu Vekhande.

In her judgment, Mrs. Alka Sarin, J., stated, “Merely because the daughters of the Testator have been left out from the Will is not sufficient ground to discard it.” The court’s reference to the aforementioned precedent establishes the principle that the exclusion of natural heirs in a will is not inherently suspicious.

The dispute centered around the estate left behind by Sat Narayan, with the plaintiffs asserting that the properties in question were ancestral and seeking a declaration of their rights. Conversely, the defendant presented a will executed by Sat Narayan, which excluded the daughters from inheritance.

By upholding the validity of the will, the High Court has underscored the importance of proving the ancestral nature of properties in such disputes. This ruling serves as a significant precedent for future cases involving wills and inheritance rights, emphasizing that the exclusion of natural heirs does not in itself cast doubt on the validity of a will.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court’s decision clarifies the legal position, ensuring that the intentions of the testator are respected while settling disputes over ancestral property and inheritance rights.

Date of Decision: 31.05.2022.

Smt. Sunita Devi vs Smt. Shalu Devi and Ors.

 

Latest Legal News