Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal

EXCLUSION OF NATURAL HEIRS IN A WILL NOT RAISE SUSPICION, EXCLUDING DAUGHTERS FROM INHERITANCE – P&H HC

03 September 2024 10:27 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided by Mrs. Alka Sarin, J., has dismissed an appeal while affirming the validity of a will that excludes daughters from inheritance. The judgment, delivered on 31st May 2022, emphasizes that the exclusion of natural heirs in a will does not raise suspicion, citing the precedent set in the case of Ramabai Padamakar Patil (D) through LRs. V. Rukminibai Vishnu Vekhande.

In her judgment, Mrs. Alka Sarin, J., stated, “Merely because the daughters of the Testator have been left out from the Will is not sufficient ground to discard it.” The court’s reference to the aforementioned precedent establishes the principle that the exclusion of natural heirs in a will is not inherently suspicious.

The dispute centered around the estate left behind by Sat Narayan, with the plaintiffs asserting that the properties in question were ancestral and seeking a declaration of their rights. Conversely, the defendant presented a will executed by Sat Narayan, which excluded the daughters from inheritance.

By upholding the validity of the will, the High Court has underscored the importance of proving the ancestral nature of properties in such disputes. This ruling serves as a significant precedent for future cases involving wills and inheritance rights, emphasizing that the exclusion of natural heirs does not in itself cast doubt on the validity of a will.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court’s decision clarifies the legal position, ensuring that the intentions of the testator are respected while settling disputes over ancestral property and inheritance rights.

Date of Decision: 31.05.2022.

Smt. Sunita Devi vs Smt. Shalu Devi and Ors.

 

Latest Legal News