Married Daughter Cannot Be Excluded From Compassionate Appointment Solely On The Ground Of Marriage: Chhattisgarh High Court Allahabad HC Condemns Lawyers Seeking Adjournments To Attend District Courts Inherent Powers Under Section 151 CPC Cannot Be Invoked For Restoration Of Possession When Statutory Remedy Of Restitution Exists: Calcutta High Court Invoke Preventive Detention Laws Against Sand Mining Kingpins: Supreme Court Directs ED Probe To Protect Chambal Sanctuary Res Judicata Bars Pendente Lite Purchaser From Re-Agitating Impleadment Under Order XXII Rule 10 CPC If Rejected Under Order I Rule 10: Supreme Court Consumer Complaints Can Continue Against Promoters & Co-Developers Even If Corporate Debtor Is Under IBC Moratorium: Supreme Court IBC Moratorium Protects Only Corporate Debtor, Does Not Bar Consumer Complaints Against Promoters & Directors: Supreme Court Vehicle Registration Certificate Relevant But Not Conclusive For Deciding Interim Custody Under Section 451 CrPC: Supreme Court Lawyer Has No Unqualified Right To Continuous Presence During Entire Interrogation Under Section 38 BNSS: Supreme Court Mandating Continuous Videography Of Accused During Transit Is Unworkable, May Lead To Unfounded Allegations: Supreme Court Centre Introduces FCRA Amendment Bill 2026: Proposes Vesting Of Defunct NGO Assets In 'Designated Authority', Mandates Prior Nod For Probe Written Communication Of Grounds Of Arrest Not Mandatory For Arrests Prior To SC's 'Mihir Rajesh Shah' Judgment: Orissa High Court Passing Ex-Parte Maintenance Order Without Verifying Status Of WhatsApp Or Email Notice Violates Natural Justice: Madhya Pradesh High Court Training ChatGPT On Copyrighted News Is 'Fair Dealing', Does Not Amount To Infringement: Delhi High Court Refuses To Enjoin OpenAI Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Rethinking Access to Justice: Proposing a Client-Choice Bar-Integrated Model as a Viable Alternative to the LADC System Delhi Police Grants Permission To Advocates To Protest At Jantar Mantar On August 7 Over LADC Concerns Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

EWS/DG Students’ Admission Cannot be Compromised: Delhi High Court Upholds Rights of EWS Students in School Admissions

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment that underscores the importance of education for children from economically weaker sections (EWS), the High Court of Delhi has ruled in favor of upholding the ‘Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009’ (RTE Act). The case (W.P.(C) 5194/2023) involved a dispute over the admission of a five-year-old child, Amitanjali Tiwari, under the EWS category at the Sovereign School.

Justice C. Hari Shankar, presiding over the matter, observed that the essence of the RTE Act is to ensure the educational upliftment of underprivileged children. The Court highlighted that schools are mandated to admit a minimum of 25% EWS/DG students and clarified the principle of carrying forward unfilled EWS/DG vacancies from the previous academic year.

In his judgment, Justice Shankar stated, “Admitting of EWS/DG students to the extent of at least 25% of the strength of its entry-level class is the statutory obligation of every school which falls within Section 2(n)(iv) of the RTE Act.” The Court noted that this obligation extends to carrying forward unfilled vacancies to the next year, should there be a shortfall.

The case centered around the denial of admission to Amitanjali Tiwari by the Sovereign School, despite being eligible and following the DOE’s directives. The petitioner, represented by her mother, Anjali Pandey, approached the Court after the school repeatedly denied admission.

The High Court’s decision was partly in favor of the petitioner. While Amitanjali will continue her current academic session as an EWS student at Sovereign School, the Directorate of Education (DOE) has been directed to ensure her admission in a neighboring school as an EWS/DG candidate for the next academic year.

Justice Shankar emphasized the DOE’s critical role in ensuring compliance with the RTE Act and remarked, “It is the responsibility of the school concerned to bring any error to the notice of the DOE on release of the first intimation by the DOE and within the time provided therein.”

This landmark ruling is seen as a significant step in reinforcing the rights of EWS children to education and ensuring that schools adhere to their statutory obligations under the RTE Act.

Date of Decision: 29 January 2024

ANJALI PANDEY VS GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

 

Latest Legal News