Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Evidence Must Align with Pleadings: Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment handed down by the High Court of Kerala, the principle of legal proceedings requiring that “Evidence Must Align with Pleadings” has been reaffirmed. The judgment, delivered by Justice A. BADHARUDEEN on September 20, 2023, emphasized the crucial importance of consistency between the allegations made in pleadings and the evidence presented in court.

The case in question was a civil appeal involving a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale. The defendant in the case contended that the property in question was sold to a nominee of the plaintiff, which had not been pleaded in the written statement and had not been proved by evidence. This case highlighted the fundamental rule that parties in legal proceedings must adhere to their pleadings.

Justice A. BADHARUDEEN, in the judgment, referred to several legal precedents to support the principle. He cited the well-established rule that decisions in a case should be based on the grounds presented in the pleadings, and it is the case pleaded that must be found. The judgment emphasized that without an amendment of the pleadings, the court is not entitled to grant relief that was not asked for.

Furthermore, the judgment noted that one cannot succeed in a case by adducing evidence that is not supported by the pleadings. It emphasized that evidence not in conformity with the pleadings cannot be relied upon, and trial courts must work within the scope of pleadings and evidence.

The judgment also referred to a recent decision by the Supreme Court, underscoring that one can only let in evidence in tune with their pleadings, and evidence at variance with the pleadings cannot be considered.

In the result, the High Court upheld the principle that parties in a suit should not succeed by introducing evidence that is not in alignment with their pleadings. The judgment dismissed the appeal with costs to be borne by the respective parties.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the fundamental legal principle that legal proceedings should be based on what is pleaded, and evidence presented must align with the case put forth in pleadings.

Date of Decision: September 20, 2023

M.N.SAJI  Vs K.R.KRISHNAKUMAR,

Latest Legal News