'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Evidence Must Align with Pleadings: Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment handed down by the High Court of Kerala, the principle of legal proceedings requiring that “Evidence Must Align with Pleadings” has been reaffirmed. The judgment, delivered by Justice A. BADHARUDEEN on September 20, 2023, emphasized the crucial importance of consistency between the allegations made in pleadings and the evidence presented in court.

The case in question was a civil appeal involving a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale. The defendant in the case contended that the property in question was sold to a nominee of the plaintiff, which had not been pleaded in the written statement and had not been proved by evidence. This case highlighted the fundamental rule that parties in legal proceedings must adhere to their pleadings.

Justice A. BADHARUDEEN, in the judgment, referred to several legal precedents to support the principle. He cited the well-established rule that decisions in a case should be based on the grounds presented in the pleadings, and it is the case pleaded that must be found. The judgment emphasized that without an amendment of the pleadings, the court is not entitled to grant relief that was not asked for.

Furthermore, the judgment noted that one cannot succeed in a case by adducing evidence that is not supported by the pleadings. It emphasized that evidence not in conformity with the pleadings cannot be relied upon, and trial courts must work within the scope of pleadings and evidence.

The judgment also referred to a recent decision by the Supreme Court, underscoring that one can only let in evidence in tune with their pleadings, and evidence at variance with the pleadings cannot be considered.

In the result, the High Court upheld the principle that parties in a suit should not succeed by introducing evidence that is not in alignment with their pleadings. The judgment dismissed the appeal with costs to be borne by the respective parties.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the fundamental legal principle that legal proceedings should be based on what is pleaded, and evidence presented must align with the case put forth in pleadings.

Date of Decision: September 20, 2023

M.N.SAJI  Vs K.R.KRISHNAKUMAR,

Latest Legal News