Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Even Major Unmarried Daughter Entitled to Father’s Maintenance: Gujarat High Court Upholds Maintenance for Daughter in Second Marriage

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Gujarat High Court has affirmed the decision of the Family Court, Ahmedabad, granting maintenance to an unmarried major daughter from her father, following a second marriage. The case, titled Khokhar Bhikhabhai S/O Jinabhai Chakubhai vs. Khokhar Sangeetaben Bhikhabhai & 3 others, revolved around the legality of maintenance awarded to the daughter from a second marriage.

The Court delved into the legal point concerning the maintenance rights of a daughter from her father, especially in the context of a second marriage. The key issue was whether an unmarried major daughter is entitled to maintenance from her father under Hindu law.

The petitioner, married to respondent No.1, had separated two months post-marriage. Following this, respondent No.1 filed a Criminal Misc. Application for maintenance for her children from a previous marriage. The Family Court awarded Rs.1500/- per month to the respondent No.3 (daughter) from the date of the application till realization. The petitioner challenged this decision, claiming a lack of income and questioning the legal status of his marriage.

Justice J.C. Doshi noted the legal marriage between the petitioner and respondent No.1, as evidenced by the marriage registration. The Court observed that the petitioner had acknowledged the responsibility of maintaining respondent No.3 in a compromise deed. Citing the judgment of Jagdish Jagtavat Vs. Manjulata and others and Section 20(3) of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, the Court affirmed that an unmarried major daughter is entitled to maintenance from her father.

The High Court dismissed the petition, upholding the maintenance order for respondent No.3. The Court found no error in the Family Court’s decision, thus ensuring the daughter’s right to maintenance from her father, regardless of her age and the nature of her parents’ marriage.

Date of Decision: February 15, 2024

Bhikhabhai vs. Khokhar Sangeetaben Bhikhabhai & 3 others

Latest Legal News