UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Even Major Unmarried Daughter Entitled to Father’s Maintenance: Gujarat High Court Upholds Maintenance for Daughter in Second Marriage

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Gujarat High Court has affirmed the decision of the Family Court, Ahmedabad, granting maintenance to an unmarried major daughter from her father, following a second marriage. The case, titled Khokhar Bhikhabhai S/O Jinabhai Chakubhai vs. Khokhar Sangeetaben Bhikhabhai & 3 others, revolved around the legality of maintenance awarded to the daughter from a second marriage.

The Court delved into the legal point concerning the maintenance rights of a daughter from her father, especially in the context of a second marriage. The key issue was whether an unmarried major daughter is entitled to maintenance from her father under Hindu law.

The petitioner, married to respondent No.1, had separated two months post-marriage. Following this, respondent No.1 filed a Criminal Misc. Application for maintenance for her children from a previous marriage. The Family Court awarded Rs.1500/- per month to the respondent No.3 (daughter) from the date of the application till realization. The petitioner challenged this decision, claiming a lack of income and questioning the legal status of his marriage.

Justice J.C. Doshi noted the legal marriage between the petitioner and respondent No.1, as evidenced by the marriage registration. The Court observed that the petitioner had acknowledged the responsibility of maintaining respondent No.3 in a compromise deed. Citing the judgment of Jagdish Jagtavat Vs. Manjulata and others and Section 20(3) of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, the Court affirmed that an unmarried major daughter is entitled to maintenance from her father.

The High Court dismissed the petition, upholding the maintenance order for respondent No.3. The Court found no error in the Family Court’s decision, thus ensuring the daughter’s right to maintenance from her father, regardless of her age and the nature of her parents’ marriage.

Date of Decision: February 15, 2024

Bhikhabhai vs. Khokhar Sangeetaben Bhikhabhai & 3 others

Latest Legal News