Hardship That Was Not Foreseen At The Time Of Entering The Contract Cannot Be A Ground To Deny Specific Performance:  Supreme Court Of India Transfers Made to Defeat the Ceiling Act Are Void Under Sections 8 and 10: Supreme Court Upholds Decisions Declaring Surplus Land Transfers Invalid Compromise Decree Affirming Pre-Existing Rights Requires No Registration or Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Criticizes Arbitrary Termination and Misuse of Temporary Contracts: Supreme Court Directs Regularization of Long-Serving Temporary Employees Partition During Owner’s Lifetime Invalid Under Mohammedan Law: Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Over Alleged Oral Gift and Partition Time Gap Between Alleged Act and Suicide Nullifies Link to Abetment: Supreme Court Quashes Abetment to Suicide Charges Hindu Succession Act Does Not Apply to Scheduled Tribes Unless Notified: Supreme Court Section 53-A of Transfer of Property Act Protection Cannot Be Invoked Without Proof of Written Contract and Performance Obligations: Supreme Court Reinvestigation Post-Acquittal Violates Double Jeopardy Safeguards: Supreme Court Victim’s Majority and Consensual Relationship Prima Facie Established: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case Madras High Court Validates Registered Will, Labels Subsequent Unregistered Will as Shrouded with Suspicion Confession Under Section 67 NDPS Act Must Be Voluntary, True, and Corroborated to Sustain Conviction: Delhi High Court Failure to Upload Names Cannot Debar Benefits – Calcutta High Court Orders Approval of Accompanists as SACT-II Compromise Invalid in POCSO Offenses: Rajasthan High Court Denies Bail in Child Rape Case Right to Reputation Cannot Be Compromised by Baseless Allegations: Digital Platforms Must Act Responsibly: Delhi High Court Parity Principle Justifies Bail When Similarly Placed Co-Accused Have Been Released: P&H Court Presumption of Innocence is Paramount: Kerala High Court Grants Bail in Acid Attack Case No Direct Employer-Employee Relationship Established: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Workman’s Claim for Reinstatement Under ID Act Promissory Note Alone Can't Prove Debt: Kerala High Court Highlights Need for Credible Evidence Confessions By Co-Accused Cannot Form Sole Basis For Indictment Without Independent Evidence: Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution in 1993 Communal Riot Case Sanctioning Authority Must Independently Apply Its Mind; A Mechanical Approval Cannot Justify Prosecution: Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Supreme Court Slams Punjab Government For Failing To Shift Hunger-Striking Farmer Leader To Hospital

Ensuring Safety and Financial Upliftment is Paramount: High Court Affirms Development Agreement for Deities’ Benefit

01 January 2025 3:38 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


High Court greenlights property development under strict compliance with municipal regulations, securing deities’ safety and financial stability.

The Calcutta High Court, presided by Justice Krishna Rao, has approved a development agreement concerning the property at Raghunath Chatterjee Street, Kolkata, aimed at benefiting the deities “Sri Sri Durga Mata Thakurani” and “Sri Sri Raghunath Jew.” The decision emphasizes the importance of ensuring the deities’ safety and financial upliftment amidst deteriorating property conditions.

The case, CSOS 1 of 2023, involved the plaintiff, Sri Gopendra Nath Bhanja, the current Sebait (caretaker) of the deities, seeking the court’s opinion on executing a development agreement with defendant no. 13, a construction company, for the Raghunath Chatterjee Street property. The property, in a dilapidated condition, required substantial repairs and maintenance, which were financially unfeasible for the plaintiff.

The court affirmed that executing the proposed development agreement would benefit the deities. The agreement includes financial provisions and property allocation that will ensure the deities’ safety and upliftment. The court noted, “The deities’ welfare and the enhancement of their property holdings are paramount in this agreement.”

The plaintiff highlighted financial difficulties in maintaining the properties and deities, requiring approximately Rs. 1,70,000 annually for ceremonies, salaries, and taxes. Defendant no. 13 proposed a development plan that included financial benefits and allocation of the entire ground floor to the deities. The court approved this proposal, emphasizing that it addresses the financial and safety concerns effectively.

The court directed strict compliance with Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC) regulations for property development. The KMC report limited the permissible Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and constructed area, necessitating modifications to the development proposal. The court stated, “Adherence to municipal guidelines is essential for lawful and sustainable property development.”

Justice Krishna Rao emphasized that the development agreement aligns with the deities’ best interests, providing financial stability and improving their living conditions. The judgment underscored, “The modified development proposal ensures both the physical safety and financial security of the deities, reflecting a balanced approach to property management.”


Justice Krishna Rao remarked, “Ensuring the deities’ safety and financial upliftment through this development agreement is not only beneficial but necessary given the current state of the properties.”

The Calcutta High Court’s approval of the development agreement for the Raghunath Chatterjee Street property underscores the judiciary’s commitment to safeguarding religious trusts’ interests. This landmark decision ensures the deities’ welfare through strategic property development, setting a precedent for future cases involving religious estate management.


Date of Decision: June 27, 2024
 

Similar News