Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Engaged In Selling And Repairing Electrical Goods Falls In Definition Of “Factory” And “Manufacturing Process”: SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has affirmed the interpretation of the definitions of “Factory” and “manufacturing process” under the Employees State Insurance Act and the Factories Act. The case, which saw M/S J.P.LIGHTS INDIA pitted against The Regional Director E.S.I. Corporation, Bangalore, centered around the classification of the appellant’s business activities under these definitions.

The Bench, comprising of Hon’ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal, delivered the verdict on July 27th, 2023. The appellant, a sole proprietorship firm, challenged the dismissal of its appeal against the order of the Employees State Insurance Court.

The Court’s judgment extensively explored the terms “Factory” and “manufacturing process,” citing Sections 2(12), 2(14AA) of the Employees State Insurance Act, and Section 2(k) of the Factories Act. The Bench clarified the conditions that define a premises as a “Factory” and the scope of a “manufacturing process.”

In the crucial observation, the Court confirmed that the appellant-firm, engaged in selling and repairing electrical goods, using electrical energy, fell within the definition of a “Factory” and was involved in a “manufacturing process” under both statutes. The ruling upheld the impugned judgment, emphasizing its alignment with statutory provisions.

The Court concluded by dismissing the appeal as meritless, with each party bearing its own expenses. This judgment not only solidifies the legal understanding of these definitions but also sheds light on the application of statutory provisions to specific business scenarios.

Date of Decision: 27th July, 2023

M/S J.P.LIGHTS INDIA vs THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR E.S.I. CORPORATION, BANGALORE

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/27-Jul-2023-SC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News