Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court

Employees Entitled to Annual Increment Despite Retirement On Very Next Day - SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has held that employees who have earned their annual increment are entitled to receive it, even if they retire on the very next day after earning the increment. The judgment came in a case where the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL) had denied the annual increment to employees who retired on the day following the increment.

The dispute centered around Regulation 40(1) of the Karnataka Electricity Board Employees Service Regulations, 1997, which states that an increment accrues from the day following its earning. The KPTCL had argued that since the employees were not in service on the day when the increment accrued, they were not entitled to it.

However, the Supreme Court rejected this argument, emphasizing that the purpose of the annual increment is to reward employees for their good conduct and efficient service rendered in the preceding year. The Court noted that the increment is earned based on the completion of one year of service with good conduct and efficiency, regardless of the employee's retirement the next day.

The Court further stated that denying employees their legitimate annual increment solely on the ground of retirement would be arbitrary and unreasonable. It held that a narrow interpretation of the regulation leading to such denial should be avoided.

Date of Judgment: April 11, 2023

The Director (Admn. and HR) VS C.P. Mundinamani & Ors. 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/11-Apr-2023-Director-KTPCL-vs-C.P.-Mundinamani-^0-Ors.pdf"]

                            

Latest Legal News