Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

Employees Entitled to Annual Increment Despite Retirement On Very Next Day - SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has held that employees who have earned their annual increment are entitled to receive it, even if they retire on the very next day after earning the increment. The judgment came in a case where the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL) had denied the annual increment to employees who retired on the day following the increment.

The dispute centered around Regulation 40(1) of the Karnataka Electricity Board Employees Service Regulations, 1997, which states that an increment accrues from the day following its earning. The KPTCL had argued that since the employees were not in service on the day when the increment accrued, they were not entitled to it.

However, the Supreme Court rejected this argument, emphasizing that the purpose of the annual increment is to reward employees for their good conduct and efficient service rendered in the preceding year. The Court noted that the increment is earned based on the completion of one year of service with good conduct and efficiency, regardless of the employee's retirement the next day.

The Court further stated that denying employees their legitimate annual increment solely on the ground of retirement would be arbitrary and unreasonable. It held that a narrow interpretation of the regulation leading to such denial should be avoided.

Date of Judgment: April 11, 2023

The Director (Admn. and HR) VS C.P. Mundinamani & Ors. 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/11-Apr-2023-Director-KTPCL-vs-C.P.-Mundinamani-^0-Ors.pdf"]

                            

Similar News