Economic Offences Cannot Be Categorized into One Group for Denial of Bail; Individual Case Merits Consideration – Delhi High Court Grants Bail in Alleged Economic Offences Under IPC Sections 420 and 409

In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has granted bail to Sai Ramakrishna Karuturi, Director of M/s Karuturi Global Limited, in a case involving alleged economic offences under IPC sections 420 (Cheating) and 409 (Criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant, or agent). The judgment emphasizes the need to treat each case of economic offence on its individual merits, rather than categorizing them into a single group for the purpose of denial of bail.

The FIR was lodged against Mr. Sai Ramakrishna Karuturi on allegations of failing to fulfill agreements with the Government of Djibouti and misappropriating funds meant for land development in Ethiopia. The petitioner argued that the transactions were bonafide, affected by natural calamities invoking Force Majeure, and asserted that part of the funds was returned.

Acknowledgment of Investigation Completion: The Court noted that the investigation has been completed and sanction for prosecution is awaited under Section 188 of the Cr.P.C.

onsideration of Petitioner’s Health: The Court acknowledged the health condition of the petitioner and his absence of prior offenses.

Analysis of Financial Transactions: Detailed scrutiny of financial transactions, e-mails, and statements from involved parties was undertaken. The Court observed discrepancies and lack of investigation regarding certain claims made by both parties.

Role of Force Majeure: The Court recognized the impact of natural calamities on the petitioner’s ability to fulfill the contractual obligations, acknowledging the Force Majeure clause.

Significance of the Petitioner’s Role: The Court considered the petitioner’s significant role as a large investor in Ethiopia, which indicates his non-fleeting nature.

Absence of Civil Proceedings: Notably, the Court pointed out the lack of civil proceedings by the complainant for recovery of the alleged dues post the acknowledgment of debt.

The Decision Considering the completion of the investigation, the health condition of the petitioner, and the likelihood of non-tampering with evidence, the Court granted bail to Mr. Karuturi. The bail was subject to conditions including a bond of Rs. 5,00,000/- and restrictions on travel and communication.

Date of Decision: April 04, 2024

Sai Ramakrishna Karuturi Vs. State of NCT Delhi