Bail | Right to Speedy Trial is a Fundamental Right Under Article 21: PH High Court    |     Postal Department’s Power to Enhance Penalties Time-Barred, Rules Allahabad High Court    |     Tenants Cannot Cross-Examine Landlords Unless Relationship is Disputed: Madras High Court    |     NDPS | Conscious Possession Extends to Vehicle Drivers: Telangana High Court Upholds 10-Year Sentence in Ganja Trafficking Case    |     Aid Reduction Of Without Due Process Unlawful: Rajasthan High Court Restores Full Grants for Educational Institutions    |     Assessment of Notional Income in Absence of Proof Cannot Be 'Mathematically Precise,' Says Patna High Court    |     NCLT's Resolution Plan Overrides State Tax Claims: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Demands Against Patanjali Foods    |     An Agreement is Not Voidable if the Party Could Discover the Truth with Ordinary Diligence: Calcutta High Court Quashes Termination of LPG Distributorship License    |     Independent Witnesses Contradict Prosecution's Story: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquit Accused in Arson Case    |     Merely Being a Joint Account Holder Does Not Attract Liability Under Section 138 of NI Act:  Gujarat High Court    |     Higher Court Cannot Reappreciate Evidence Unless Perversity is Found: Himachal Pradesh High Court Refused to Enhance Maintenance    |     Perpetual Lease Allows Division of Property: Delhi High Court Affirms Partition and Validity of Purdah Wall    |     "Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Videography in Temple Premises Limited to Religious Functions: Kerala High Court Orders to Restrict Non-Religious Activities on Temple Premises    |     Past Service Must Be Counted for Pension Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Affirms Pension Rights for Daily Wage Employees    |     'Beyond Reasonable Doubt’ Does Not Mean Beyond All Doubt: Madras High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Man Convicted of Murdering Mother-in-Law    |    

Duty of Employers to Provide a Rational and Justifiable Reason for Rejection: Supreme Court

05 September 2024 5:37 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment dated 11th October, 2023, the Supreme Court of India highlighted the crucial duty of employers to provide a rational and justifiable reason for rejecting applicants in cases involving eligibility for public employment. The case, which dealt with disqualification based on conflicting interpretations of an educational certificate, underscored the importance of fair and non-discriminatory treatment in the selection process.

The judgment, delivered by the bench of BELA M. TRIVEDI and DIPANKAR DATTA, focused on a case where an applicant was declared ineligible after actively participating in the selection process. The Court held that once a candidate has been allowed to participate in the selection process and subsequently appears in the merit list, they have a reasonable expectation of being appointed.

However, the Court noted that if the candidate's eligibility is questioned during the selection process, it is the duty of the employer to provide a reasoned explanation for disqualification. In this case, the employer had declared the applicant ineligible based on their interpretation of the educational certificate, but failed to seek clarification from the issuing authority. The Court found this action to be arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice.

The judgment further directed the employer to offer the disqualified applicant an appointment, initially on probation, and create a supernumerary post if no vacancy exists. It also specified that the applicant would not be entitled to arrears of salary or seniority but would be eligible for retiral benefits based on the last pay drawn.

The ruling serves as a reminder that employers, especially those in the public sector, must adhere to fair and transparent selection processes and provide valid reasons for disqualifications. The duty to act fairly and without arbitrariness is essential to uphold the principles of equality and justice enshrined in the Constitution of India.

Date of Decision: 11 October, 2023

UNION OF INDIA  vs UZAIR IMRAN & ORS.   

Similar News