Registration Of FIR Is Mandatory If Information Ex Facie Discloses Commission Of  Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court 'No Res Judicata': Supreme Court Holds Rejection Of Section 156(3) CrPC Plea Is No Bar To Subsequent Registration Of FIR Auto Dealers' Referral Charges From Banks & Insurers Constitute 'Business Auxiliary Service', But No Penalty If Tax Paid Before Show Cause Notice: Supreme Court MACT | Appellate Courts Must Liberally Admit Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC To Compute 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court MACT | Post-Accident Vehicle Position On Sketch Cannot Be Sole Basis To Infer Contributory Negligence: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹50.8 Lakhs 'Sanction Under Section 19(1)(c) PC Act Must Be Granted By Removing Authority': Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Mere Recovery Of Money Cannot Resurrect Prosecution Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Awards Without Signatures Of All Rival Claimants Are Invalid, Order I Rule 8 CPC Inapplicable: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Cannot Decide Title Disputes, Mere Physical Possession Doesn't Prove Ownership": Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition Awards Power Discoms Can't Escape Liability: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Damages For Death Caused By Snapped Live Wires Lying On Ground Extra-Judicial Confessions To Village Administrative Officers Cannot Be Accepted As Gospel Truth Without Signatures And Corroboration: Madras High Court Acquits Murder Accused 'Article 21 Trumps UAPA Rigors': Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To PFI Members After 5 Years In Jail Due To 'Sluggish' Trial" Daughters Cannot Be Denied Equal Share: Orissa High Court Upholds Compensation Apportionment In Favor Of Daughters Under Hindu Succession Act Cannot Reopen Closed Chapter Years Later: Calcutta High Court Dismisses BSF Ex-Head Constable's Plea Claiming Voluntary Retirement Was Extracted Under Coercion Long-Standing Relationship And Public Recognition Prove Valid Marriage: Karnataka High Court Upholds Second Wife's Right To 1/3rd Share In Property Collector Becomes Functus Officio Once Duty Is Determined: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Penalty On Stamp Duty Deficiency Eyewitness Testimony Contradicted By Medical Evidence Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Woman In IPC 302 Case

Duty of Employers to Provide a Rational and Justifiable Reason for Rejection: Supreme Court

05 September 2024 5:37 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment dated 11th October, 2023, the Supreme Court of India highlighted the crucial duty of employers to provide a rational and justifiable reason for rejecting applicants in cases involving eligibility for public employment. The case, which dealt with disqualification based on conflicting interpretations of an educational certificate, underscored the importance of fair and non-discriminatory treatment in the selection process.

The judgment, delivered by the bench of BELA M. TRIVEDI and DIPANKAR DATTA, focused on a case where an applicant was declared ineligible after actively participating in the selection process. The Court held that once a candidate has been allowed to participate in the selection process and subsequently appears in the merit list, they have a reasonable expectation of being appointed.

However, the Court noted that if the candidate's eligibility is questioned during the selection process, it is the duty of the employer to provide a reasoned explanation for disqualification. In this case, the employer had declared the applicant ineligible based on their interpretation of the educational certificate, but failed to seek clarification from the issuing authority. The Court found this action to be arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice.

The judgment further directed the employer to offer the disqualified applicant an appointment, initially on probation, and create a supernumerary post if no vacancy exists. It also specified that the applicant would not be entitled to arrears of salary or seniority but would be eligible for retiral benefits based on the last pay drawn.

The ruling serves as a reminder that employers, especially those in the public sector, must adhere to fair and transparent selection processes and provide valid reasons for disqualifications. The duty to act fairly and without arbitrariness is essential to uphold the principles of equality and justice enshrined in the Constitution of India.

Date of Decision: 11 October, 2023

UNION OF INDIA  vs UZAIR IMRAN & ORS.   

Latest Legal News