CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Due to worrisome spike in the Covid Punjab and Haryana High Court issued directions

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


It has been observed that due to an unexpected and worrisome spike in the Covid, the situation has once again turned grim and dangerous. 

Punjab and Haryana High Court on 28.04.2021 had issued directions in a suo-motu proceeding in view of grave situation arising out of Covid-19 pandemic. Many applications were brought before the Court by various authorities and individuals decided by this Court.                      

Punjab and Haryana High court stated that sudden and alarming surge in the number of people, who have been tested Covid positive, the situation has again turned grim and extremely unsafe. 

High Court of Punjab and Haryana issued following directions till 28.02.2022 ; 

  1. That all the interim orders/directions issued or protection granted including any order requiring any compliance by the parties to such proceedings, passed by this Court or any other Court subordinate to it or any Family Court or Labour Court or any Tribunal or any other Judicial or Quasi-Judicial forum, over which this Court has power of superintendence, which are subsisting today shall stand extended till 28.02.2022; provided that the Court concern shall not automatically continue the interim directions and would be free to continue, modify or recall, as the case may be, the interim orders in case it is of the opinion that the direction contained above is being misused or abused and for that purpose may take up the matter on the date fixed. In all other cases, the interim direction, as contained above, shall continue to be extended uptill 28.02.2022.  
  2.  That it is further directed that the interim orders or directions of this Court or any Court subordinate to this Court, which are not of a limited duration and are meant to operate till further orders, shall continue to remain in force until modified/altered/vacated by specific order of the Court concerned in a particular case;  
  3.  That the time for filing of written-statement or return in any Suit or proceeding pending before any Civil Court or any other forum, unless specifically directed, shall stand extended till 28.02.2022. It is however clarified that this will not preclude the parties from filing such written-statement or return before 28.02.2022; 
  4.  That it is further directed that the orders of eviction, dispossession, demolition, etc. passed by this Court or any Court subordinate to it or any Tribunal or Judicial or Quasi Judicial forum, which have so far remained unexecuted, shall remain in abeyance till 28.02.2022;   
  5. That interim protection given in the anticipatory bail applications by the High Court or Court of Sessions for a limited period, which is likely to expire from now up to 28.02.2022, shall stand extended till 28.02.2022. However, any party aggrieved by the conduct of the accused on such interim protection, may move the Court seisin over the matter for discontinuation of such interim protection, if any prejudice is caused to him/her, in which event, the Court concerned shall be entitled to take independent view of the matter;   
  6. That all the interim bails granted under Section 439, Cr.P.C. by the High Court or Courts of Sessions, limited by time-frame specifying an expiry date from now up to 28.02.2022, shall stand extended till 28.02.2022, subject to the accused not abusing such liberty or else it may be cancelled at the instance of the State or the complainant, on application with adequate proof of the abuse of the liberty so granted by the Court concerned;   
  7. That parole granted to a person by order passed by a Court exercising the criminal jurisdiction and limited by time-frame specifying an expiry date from now up to 28.02.2022, shall stand extended till 28.02.2022, subject to the condition specified in Point No.4 above;  
  8. That the State Governments, Union Territory, Chandigarh, or any of its Departments or any Municipal Corporation / Council / Board or any Gram Panchayat or any other local body or any other agency and instrumentality of the State shall not take any action for eviction and demolition in respect of any property, over which any citizen or person or party or any Body Corporate, has physical or symbolic possession as on today till 28.02.2022.      
  9. That it is further directed that any Bank or Financial Institution shall not take action for auction in respect of any property of any citizen or person or party or any Body corporate till 28.02.2022; subject to the clarification issued by this Court vide  orders dated 20.08.2021 and 23.09.2021 restricting its applicability.   
  10. That if the Government of Punjab, Haryana, Union Territory, Chandigarh, and/or any of its Departments and/or functionaries, Central Government and/or its departments or functionaries or any Public Sector Undertakings or any Public or Private Companies or any Firm or any individual or person is/are, by the order of this Court or any Court subordinate to it or the Tribunals, required to do a particular thing or carry out certain direction in a particular manner, in a time frame, which is going to expire at any time from now up to 28.02.2022, the time for compliance of such order shall stand extended up to 28.02.2022, unless specifically directed otherwise by the Court concerned; subject to the fact that the aforesaid prohibition shall not apply to the orders/directions, which were required to be complied with and are meant for the benefit of the litigant or public at large.   
  11. That in order to dispel any ambiguity, it is clarified that:-   
  • Those interim orders / directions, which are not for a limited duration and are to operate until further orders, shall by this order remain unaffected;   
  • That, in case extension of interim order(s) as per the present order passed by this Court, causes any undue hardship and prejudice of any extreme nature, to any of the parties to such proceeding(s), such parties would be at liberty to seek appropriate relief by moving appropriate application(s) before the Competent Court(s), Tribunal, Judicial or Quasi-Judicial Forum, and these directions shall not be taken as a bar for such Courts/Forums to consider such application(s) filed by the aggrieved party, on its own merit, after due notice and providing opportunity of hearing to the other side;   
  • That the directions enumerated above shall not preclude the States or Union Territory, Chandigarh or Central Government from moving appropriate application for vacation/modification of such order in any particular case for reason of overriding public interest;   
  • That all Courts, Tribunals, Judicial and Quasi-judicial authorities are directed to abide by these directions, and the parties seeking relief(s) covered by these directions can file hard copy or soft copy of this order before the competent court/forum, which shall be given due weightage.      

Latest Legal News