Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

"Doubts Surrounding Dying Declaration Lead to Acquittal in Dowry Death Case"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, doubts surrounding a dying declaration have resulted in the acquittal of the accused in a dowry death case. The judgment, delivered by the Supreme Court of India, highlights the critical importance of establishing the voluntariness and reliability of such declarations in criminal cases.

The case in question, Criminal Appeal No. 396 of 2010, involved a tragic incident where the appellant was accused of setting his wife on fire. The conviction was primarily based on a dying declaration recorded by an Executive Magistrate. However, the Supreme Court raised concerns about the credibility of this declaration.

The Supreme Court noted, "The dying declaration was recorded by an Executive Magistrate on 8th November 1991, three days after the incident, and questions arise about its voluntariness, as there were suggestions of possible tutoring by the deceased's relatives."

Furthermore, the Court pointed out discrepancies in the timing of the medical examination and the statement recording, which cast doubt on the sequence of events. The lack of corroborating evidence further weakened the credibility of the dying declaration.

As a result of these concerns, the Court ruled that the conviction based on this dying declaration was not sustainable.

In addition to the issues with the dying declaration, the Court also found insufficiency of evidence to establish harassment due to non-fulfillment of dowry demands, a critical element in the case. The prosecution relied on the testimony of relatives of the deceased, but their evidence lacked specificity and concrete details regarding the alleged harassment.

The Court emphasized that vague allegations without substantial corroboration could not prove that the deceased was subjected to harassment related to dowry demands. Consequently, the prosecution failed to establish a case under Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code.

In the final verdict, the Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of all charges and ordered the discharge of his bail bonds.

This judgment underscores the need for rigorous scrutiny of dying declarations and the importance of concrete evidence in criminal cases. It serves as a reminder that justice must be based on solid legal principles and the highest standards of proof.

 

 Date of Decision:  September 27, 2023

PHULEL SINGH vs STATE OF HARAYANA  

Latest Legal News