Employees Cannot Pick Favourable Terms and Reject the Rest: Bombay High Court Upholds SIDBI’s Cut-Off Date for Pension to CPF Optees Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Mere Long Possession By One Co-Owner Does Not Destroy The Co-Ownership Right Of The Other: Madras High Court State Cannot Hide Behind An Illegal Undertaking: Punjab & Haryana High Court Questions Denial Of Retrospective Regularization Article 21-A Cannot Be Held Hostage to Transfer Preferences: Allahabad High Court Upholds Teacher Redeployment to Enforce Pupil–Teacher Ratio Arbitrator Cannot Rewrite Contract Or Travel Beyond Pleadings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes ₹5.18 Crore Award Director’ in GeM Clause 29 Does Not Mean ‘Independent Director’: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Technical Disqualification Section 25(3) Is Sacrosanct – Removal of a Trademark Cannot Rest on a Defective Notice: Delhi High Court Not Every Broken Promise Is Rape: Delhi High Court Draws Clear Line Between ‘Suspicion’ and ‘Grave Suspicion’ in False Promise to Marry Case Section 37 Is Not A Second Appeal On Merits: Delhi High Court Refuses To Re-Appreciate Evidence In Challenge To Arbitral Award Recovery After Retirement Is Clearly Impermissible: Bombay High Court Shields Retired Teacher From ₹2.80 Lakh Salary Recovery Paying Tax Does Not Legalise Illegality: Bombay High Court Refuses to Shield Alleged Unauthorized Structure Beneficial Pension Scheme Cannot Be Defeated By Cut-Off Dates: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs EPFO To Follow Sunil Kumar B. Guidelines On Higher Pension Claims Equity Aids the Vigilant, Not Those Who Sleep Over Their Rights: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses to Revive 36-Year-Old Pay Parity Claim Students Cannot Be Penalised For Legislative Invalidity: Supreme Court Protects Degrees Granted Before 2005 Yash Pal Verdict Restructuring Without Fulfilment of Conditions Cannot Defeat Insolvency: Supreme Court Reaffirms Default as the Sole Trigger Under Section 7 IBC Section 100-A CPC Slams The Door On Intra-Court Appeals In RERA Matters”: Allahabad High Court Declares Special Appeal Not Maintainable Mental Distance Between ‘May Be’ and ‘Must Be’ Is Long: Patna High Court Acquits Six in Murder Case Built on Broken Chain of Circumstances Where Corruption Takes Roots, Rule of Law Is Replaced by Rule of Transaction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to DIG Harcharan Singh Bhullar Mere Voter List and Corrected SSC Certificate Cannot Prove Paternity: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects 21-Year-Old Bid for DNA Test in Partition Appeal Section 147 NI Act Makes Offence Compoundable At Any Stage: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Concurrent Convictions in Cheque Bounce Case After Settlement Bald Allegations of Adultery Based on Suspicion Cannot Dissolve a Marriage: Jharkhand High Court Once a Document Is Admitted in Evidence, Its Stamp Defect Cannot Be Reopened: Madras High Court

"Doubts Surrounding Dying Declaration Lead to Acquittal in Dowry Death Case"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, doubts surrounding a dying declaration have resulted in the acquittal of the accused in a dowry death case. The judgment, delivered by the Supreme Court of India, highlights the critical importance of establishing the voluntariness and reliability of such declarations in criminal cases.

The case in question, Criminal Appeal No. 396 of 2010, involved a tragic incident where the appellant was accused of setting his wife on fire. The conviction was primarily based on a dying declaration recorded by an Executive Magistrate. However, the Supreme Court raised concerns about the credibility of this declaration.

The Supreme Court noted, "The dying declaration was recorded by an Executive Magistrate on 8th November 1991, three days after the incident, and questions arise about its voluntariness, as there were suggestions of possible tutoring by the deceased's relatives."

Furthermore, the Court pointed out discrepancies in the timing of the medical examination and the statement recording, which cast doubt on the sequence of events. The lack of corroborating evidence further weakened the credibility of the dying declaration.

As a result of these concerns, the Court ruled that the conviction based on this dying declaration was not sustainable.

In addition to the issues with the dying declaration, the Court also found insufficiency of evidence to establish harassment due to non-fulfillment of dowry demands, a critical element in the case. The prosecution relied on the testimony of relatives of the deceased, but their evidence lacked specificity and concrete details regarding the alleged harassment.

The Court emphasized that vague allegations without substantial corroboration could not prove that the deceased was subjected to harassment related to dowry demands. Consequently, the prosecution failed to establish a case under Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code.

In the final verdict, the Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of all charges and ordered the discharge of his bail bonds.

This judgment underscores the need for rigorous scrutiny of dying declarations and the importance of concrete evidence in criminal cases. It serves as a reminder that justice must be based on solid legal principles and the highest standards of proof.

 

 Date of Decision:  September 27, 2023

PHULEL SINGH vs STATE OF HARAYANA  

Latest Legal News