Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary Vague and Omnibus Allegations Cannot Sustain Criminal Prosecution in Matrimonial Disputes: Calcutta High Court High Court Emphasizes Assessee’s Burden of Proof in Unexplained Cash Deposits Case Effective, efficient, and expeditious alternative remedies have been provided by the statute: High Court Dismisses Petition for New Commercial Electricity Connection Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

Doubtful Allegations' and Delayed Complaint – Kerala High Court Grants Bail to Teacher in Sexual Assault Cases

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court, presided over by the Honorable Mrs. Justice Sophy Thomas, has granted bail to a drawing teacher accused of sexually assaulting his minor students. The decision pertains to six different cases registered under various sections including the Indian Penal Code, the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, and the Juvenile Justice Act.

Justice Thomas, in her ruling, highlighted several critical points that led to the decision. "There is a delay of six days in making the complaint by the victim girls. Moreover, the allegation that on the same day, the petitioner sexually assaulted six girl students of the same class also seems doubtful," the judge observed. This observation was made in the context of the prosecution's allegation that the assaults occurred within a short timeframe on 12th December 2023, between 11:20 AM and 12:00 Noon.

The teacher, employed at Himayathul Islam School, faced accusations of outraging the modesty of his students by inappropriately touching them. However, the defense argued that the alleged incident's occurrence in a classroom setting with other students present casts doubt on the feasibility of such an act. Furthermore, the defense highlighted the delay in filing the complaints, which came six days after the alleged incident.

Taking these factors into consideration, Justice Thomas opined that the continued detention of the petitioner was not necessary for the investigation's progress. The court, thus, inclined towards granting bail with specific conditions. These include the execution of separate bonds of Rs. 50,000 with two solvent sureties for each case, reporting to the investigating officer on alternate Saturdays, refraining from entering the school premises, and not contacting or influencing the victims or witnesses.

Date of Decision: 29 JANUARY 2024

Xxxxxxx VS STATE OF KERALA

 

Similar News