Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

DNA Test Conclusively Establishes Paternity : Daughter Entitled to Maintenance and Notional Share in Deceased Father's Property : Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, Justice V. Srinivas of the Andhra Pradesh High Court partly allowed an appeal that contested the entitlement to maintenance, marriage expenses, and partition of property, consequent to the death of Palavali Viswanath. The court's decision revises the trial court’s allocation regarding the property share for the second respondent but upholds the lower court's verdict on other aspects.

The judgment addresses several crucial legal issues including the entitlement to maintenance and marriage expenses, the legitimacy and rights of children born from a void or voidable marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act, and the partitioning of property according to familial lineage.

The respondents filed a suit for past maintenance, future maintenance, marriage expenses, and the partition of property, following the death of Palavali Viswanath. The main contention involved the legitimacy of the second respondent as Viswanath’s daughter, which was initially challenged but later confirmed through DNA evidence.

Legitimacy and Maintenance Claims: The court upheld the trial court's finding based on DNA evidence that confirmed the second respondent's paternity, thereby entitling her to maintenance and marriage expenses.

Partition of Property: The court altered the trial court's decision on the property partition. The High Court ruled that the second respondent, as a legitimate daughter from a void marriage, is entitled to a share in the notionally partitioned share of her father, and not an equal share in all joint family properties. This decision clarifies her entitlement under the Hindu Marriage Act.

Application of Law: The judgment also reiterated legal positions from notable cases such as Revanasiddappa v. Mallikarjun and Raja Gounder v. M.Sengodan, which influenced the decision-making regarding the partition and inheritance rights of children from void or voidable marriages.

The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the extent of property share entitled to the second respondent. The court confirmed the trial court’s decision regarding maintenance and marriage expenses. The judgment emphasized the rights of children from void or voidable marriages to their parent's property, but not to the joint family property beyond the share of their parents.

Date of Decision: 16.04.2024

Palavalli Sugunamma & Ors. vs. Palavalli Mallika & Anr.

Similar News