"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

Divorce Denied : Marriage Breakdown Not Grounds for Divorce Under Hindu Marriage Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court

05 September 2024 5:47 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Himachal Pradesh High Court upheld the decision of the Trial Court, dismissing a divorce petition filed by an appellant seeking a divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion. The High Court's ruling emphasized that marriage breakdown alone is not a valid ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.

The appellant had contended that the respondent, his wife, had deserted him without reasonable cause and had treated him with cruelty. However, the Trial Court had found in favor of the respondent, and the appellant challenged this decision in the High Court.

One of the key points of contention in the case was the clubbing of issues by the Trial Court, which the High Court deemed not erroneous. The judgment cited a precedent to support this, stating, "It was laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in Hiru vs. Mansa Ram 2003 (1) Curr. L.J. 133 that the judgment of the Court is not bad simply because issues were taken together for discussion."

The High Court also highlighted the evidence that showed the wife was left in her parental home when she was ill, and efforts to bring her back to the matrimonial home were resisted by the appellant and his family. This fact played a significant role in the High Court's decision to dismiss the appeal.

Furthermore, the High Court reiterated that the power to dissolve a marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown is vested in the Supreme Court under Article 142 of the Constitution. This power is not available to other courts, including the High Court.

Himachal Pradesh High Court's judgment reaffirmed that marriage breakdown alone does not constitute valid grounds for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act and that the power to grant divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown rests with the Supreme Court.

Date of Decision: 16 October 2023.

Neeraj Guleria   vs Sonia

Similar News