Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court

Divorce Denied : Marriage Breakdown Not Grounds for Divorce Under Hindu Marriage Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court

05 September 2024 5:47 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Himachal Pradesh High Court upheld the decision of the Trial Court, dismissing a divorce petition filed by an appellant seeking a divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion. The High Court's ruling emphasized that marriage breakdown alone is not a valid ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.

The appellant had contended that the respondent, his wife, had deserted him without reasonable cause and had treated him with cruelty. However, the Trial Court had found in favor of the respondent, and the appellant challenged this decision in the High Court.

One of the key points of contention in the case was the clubbing of issues by the Trial Court, which the High Court deemed not erroneous. The judgment cited a precedent to support this, stating, "It was laid down by the Hon'ble High Court in Hiru vs. Mansa Ram 2003 (1) Curr. L.J. 133 that the judgment of the Court is not bad simply because issues were taken together for discussion."

The High Court also highlighted the evidence that showed the wife was left in her parental home when she was ill, and efforts to bring her back to the matrimonial home were resisted by the appellant and his family. This fact played a significant role in the High Court's decision to dismiss the appeal.

Furthermore, the High Court reiterated that the power to dissolve a marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown is vested in the Supreme Court under Article 142 of the Constitution. This power is not available to other courts, including the High Court.

Himachal Pradesh High Court's judgment reaffirmed that marriage breakdown alone does not constitute valid grounds for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act and that the power to grant divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown rests with the Supreme Court.

Date of Decision: 16 October 2023.

Neeraj Guleria   vs Sonia

Latest Legal News