Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court

Denial of Bail Must be Exception in Economic Offences: High Court Grants Bail in PACL Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court today granted regular bail to Damanjot Singh, the petitioner involved in the PACL Limited forgery case. The judgement was pronounced by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, who underscored the principle that “denial of bail must be the exception rather than the rule” in cases of economic offences, echoing his views in the landmark Maninder Sharma case.

The case, registered under various sections of the IPC, including Sections 384, 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B, revolves around allegations of criminal conspiracy and forgery in the affairs of PACL Limited. The petitioner was accused of facilitating a fictitious meeting and fraudulently appointing directors to the company.

Justice Bedi, in his decision, highlighted the considerations for bail in economic offences, especially when the trial is likely to be prolonged and the accused has been in custody without examination of any of the 46 prosecution witnesses. The court also took into account that the allegations against Singh were primarily based on his relationship with his in-laws, who are central figures in the case.

Represented by Mr. R.S. Rai, Senior Advocate, along with Ms. Eknoor Kaur Sara and Mr. Nimish Chib, Advocate, the petitioner’s plea for bail was contested by Ms. Ramta K Chaudhary, DAG, Punjab, and Mr. A.P.S. Deol, Senior Advocate, representing the complainant.

In a detailed judgement, Justice Bedi also discussed the jurisdictional aspects and the role of the Serious Fraud Investigating Office (SFIO) in the context of alleged violations of the Companies Act, 2013.

The court imposed specific conditions for bail, including monthly appearances before the police station concerned and an affidavit submission stating non-involvement in any other case/crime. Additionally, the petitioner is required to deposit a Fixed Deposit Receipt (FDR) of Rs. 5,00,000 as a security measure.

Date of Decision: 30 November  2023

Damanjot Singh  VS The State of Punjab

Latest Legal News