Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes State Election Commission's Cancellation of Panchayat Elections in Punjab J&K High Court Quashes FIR Against Bajaj Allianz, Asserts Insurance Dispute Shouldn’t Be Criminalized Sole Eyewitness's Testimony Insufficient to Sustain Murder Conviction: Madras High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Presumption of Innocence is Strengthened in Acquittal Cases; Appellate Courts Must Respect Trial Court Findings Unless Clearly Perverse: Delhi High Court NDPS | Physical or Virtual Presence of Accused is Mandatory for Extension of Detention Beyond 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Welfare Benefits for Construction Workers Due to Model Code of Conduct Section 131 of Electricity Act Does Not Mandate Finalized Transfer Scheme Before Bidding: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Privatization of UT Chandigarh Electricity Department Revenue Authorities Must Safeguard State Property, Not Indulge in Land Scams: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposed Amendment Clarifies, Not Changes, Cause of Action: High Court of Jharkhand emphasizing the necessity of amendment for determining real questions in controversy. EWS Candidates Selected on Merit Should Not Be Counted Towards Reserved Quota: P&H High Court Finance Act 2022 Amendments Upheld: Supreme Court Validates Retrospective Customs Authority for DRI Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute A Criminal Offense Unless Fraudulent Intent Exists From The Start: Delhi High Court Anticipatory Bail Not Intended As A Shield To Avoid Lawful Proceedings In Cases Of Serious Crimes: Allahabad High Court Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail in Light of Prolonged Detention and Delays in Trial U/S 480 BNSS Provision Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure of Candidates' Marks in Public Recruitment Process: Promotes Transparency under RTI Act Maintenance | Father's Duty to Support Daughters Until Self-Sufficiency or Marriage: Karnataka High Court Designation of Arbitration 'Venue' as 'Seat' Confers Exclusive Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Rules in Dubai Arbitration Case Corporate Veil Shields Company Assets from Partition as Joint Family Property: Madras High Court Principal Employers Liable for ESI Contributions for Contract Workers, But Assessments Must Be Fair and Account for Eligibility: Kerala High Court Government Entities Must be Treated Equally to Private Parties in Arbitration Proceedings: Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Disciplinary Inquiry Against Storekeeper in Ration Misappropriation Case

Demand for Maintenance of Child From In-Laws Does Not Amount to Dowry: Patna High Court Quashes Conviction under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Judicature at Patna has acquitted a man convicted for offences under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri, presiding over the bench, ruled that the demand for money for the maintenance of a child does not constitute dowry.

The court delved into the essential legal issue of whether a demand for child maintenance falls under the ambit of 'dowry' as per the Dowry Prohibition Act. This pivotal determination guided the verdict in this criminal revision case.

Facts and Issues: The case, originating from Samastipur, involved the petitioner, Naresh Pandit, accused of demanding ₹10,000 from his wife, the complainant, for the maintenance of their daughter. The complainant alleged torture for non-fulfillment of this demand. The evidence included testimonies from four witnesses, including the complainant and an independent witness. However, the court observed the absence of specifics in the allegations and questioned why the complainant did not report the incident to her close relatives.

Nature of Allegations: The court noted the general and omnibus nature of the allegations. The complainant's failure to disclose the incident to her sister and brother-in-law, residing in the same village, raised suspicions about the genuineness of the claims.

Context of Complaint: The timing of the complaint was scrutinized, as it was filed subsequent to a criminal complaint by the petitioner against the complainant, suggesting possible retaliation.

Definition of Dowry: The court analyzed the definition of dowry under Section 2(i) of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Reference was made to several Supreme Court judgments to ascertain the legal framework surrounding dowry and cruelty under Section 498A of the IPC.

Cultural Practices: The judgment discussed the prevalent cultural practice where the pregnant woman and newborn child's maintenance is often undertaken by the woman's parental home.

Final Findings: The court concluded that the demand for child maintenance did not fit the legal definition of dowry. Additionally, the charges under Section 498A of the IPC were not established as the acts did not meet the legal threshold of cruelty.

Decision of Judgment: The High Court allowed the revision, setting aside the judgment and conviction by the lower courts. Naresh Pandit was acquitted of all charges under Section 498A IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Date of Decision: March 21, 2024

Naresh Pandit Vs. The State Of Bihar & Srijan Devi

Similar News