At the Stage of Framing Charge, Presumption Suffices; Suicide Note and Grave Suspicion Enough: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Charge Under Section 306 IPC 173 CrPC | Framing of Charge Marks End of Investigation—Complainant Cannot Reopen Probe Merely by Citing Police Lapses: Bombay High Court Recovery Alone Cannot Prove Guilt: Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Photos, Videos Must Go: Supreme Court Binds Warring Spouses to Clean Up Social Media in Matrimonial Settlement Standard for Bail Under Section 319 CrPC Is Higher Than Framing of Charge, But Short of Conviction: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused Summoned Mid-Trial State Cannot Arbitrarily Deny Subsidies to 'New Industrial Units' by Retrospectively Applying Expansion Caps: Supreme Court Companies Act | Offence Under Section 448 Is Covered Under Section 447: Supreme Court Bars Private Complaint Without SFIO Nod “See-To-It” Obligation Is Not A Guarantee Under Indian Law: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope Of Section 126 ICA In IBC Disputes Mere Employment of Litigant’s Relatives in Police or Court Doesn't Prove Judicial Bias: Supreme Court Sets Aside Transfer of Criminal Case Reserved Candidate Availing Relaxed Standards in Prelims Cannot Migrate to General Quota for Cadre Allocation: Supreme Court Mere Vesting Does Not Mean Possession: Supreme Court Rules ULC Proceedings Abated For Failure To Serve Mandatory Notice To Actual Occupants Contempt of Courts Act | Natural Justice in Administrative Action: Supreme Court Directs West Bengal Govt to Re-Adjudicate Teachers' Arrears Claims Live-In Relationship with Married Man Not a ‘Relationship in the Nature of Marriage’ Under Domestic Violence Act: Bombay High Court Applies Supreme Court Guidelines Income Tax Act | Substitution of Shares held as Stock-in-Trade upon Amalgamation constitutes Taxable Business Income if Commercially Realisable: Supreme Court Judges Cannot Enact Their Own Protocols During Bail Hearings: Supreme Court Sets Aside Sweeping Age Determination Directions In POCSO If There Is Knowledge That Injury Is Likely To Cause Death, But No Intention Falls Under Section 304 Part II:  Supreme Court High Court Ignored POCSO’s Statutory Rigour, Committed Grave Error in Granting Bail: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Gang-Rape Accused Section 22 HSA | Co-Heirs Have Statutory Right of Pre-Emption Even in Urban Property: Punjab & Haryana High Court 138 NI Act | Issuance of Separate Cheques Gives Rise to Independent Causes of Action, Even if Drawn for Same Underlying Transaction: Supreme Court

Delhi High Court Upholds Scrum Alliance’s Trademark Rights; Injunction Granted Against “Certified Scrum Master” Use by Defendants

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling on trademark infringement, the Delhi High Court has upheld the rights of Scrum Alliance Inc., a U.S.-based certification organization, against the unauthorized use of its trademarks. The Court has granted an interlocutory injunction, restraining Mr. Prem Kumar S. And others from using the marks “CERTIFIED SCRUM MASTER” and an associated logo, which were found to be infringing upon Scrum Alliance’s registered Certification Trade Marks (CTMs).

Justice C. Hari Shankar, in his judgment, observed that the defendants’ use of deceptively similar marks constituted infringement of Scrum Alliance’s registered trademarks, stating, “The impugned marks ‘CSM’, ‘Certified Scrum Master’ and associated logo are similar – and, in the case of the mark CSM, identical – to the plaintiff’s registered CTMs.” He further added that “The defendants are clearly using the impugned marks as trademarks, as they are intended to indicate a connection in the course of trade between the services provided by the defendants and the impugned marks themselves.”

The Court, however, did not grant an injunction against the use of the word mark “CSM” by the defendants, as it is registered under the Trade Marks Act.

This decision marks a crucial precedent in the field of intellectual property law, especially concerning the software industry’s agile methodologies. Scrum Alliance Inc. Claims to be the largest and most influential Scrum certification organization globally, with significant presence in India. The judgment underscores the importance of protecting registered trademarks against potential infringement and confusion in the market.

The Court also addressed the validity of Scrum Alliance’s trademark registrations, observing that the plaintiff’s marks “CERTIFIED SCRUMMASTER”/”CSM” are prima facie valid, with registration being prima facie evidence of validity under Section 31(1) of the Trade Marks Act.

The matter is listed for further proceedings before the learned Joint Registrar (Judicial) on 15 December 2023. This ruling is expected to have far-reaching implications in the realm of certification and trademark rights, particularly for entities operating in multiple jurisdictions.

 

Date of Decision: 21 November 2023

SCRUM ALLIANCE, INC VS MR. PREM KUMAR S. & ORS.

 

Latest Legal News