Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Delhi High Court Upholds Scrum Alliance’s Trademark Rights; Injunction Granted Against “Certified Scrum Master” Use by Defendants

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling on trademark infringement, the Delhi High Court has upheld the rights of Scrum Alliance Inc., a U.S.-based certification organization, against the unauthorized use of its trademarks. The Court has granted an interlocutory injunction, restraining Mr. Prem Kumar S. And others from using the marks “CERTIFIED SCRUM MASTER” and an associated logo, which were found to be infringing upon Scrum Alliance’s registered Certification Trade Marks (CTMs).

Justice C. Hari Shankar, in his judgment, observed that the defendants’ use of deceptively similar marks constituted infringement of Scrum Alliance’s registered trademarks, stating, “The impugned marks ‘CSM’, ‘Certified Scrum Master’ and associated logo are similar – and, in the case of the mark CSM, identical – to the plaintiff’s registered CTMs.” He further added that “The defendants are clearly using the impugned marks as trademarks, as they are intended to indicate a connection in the course of trade between the services provided by the defendants and the impugned marks themselves.”

The Court, however, did not grant an injunction against the use of the word mark “CSM” by the defendants, as it is registered under the Trade Marks Act.

This decision marks a crucial precedent in the field of intellectual property law, especially concerning the software industry’s agile methodologies. Scrum Alliance Inc. Claims to be the largest and most influential Scrum certification organization globally, with significant presence in India. The judgment underscores the importance of protecting registered trademarks against potential infringement and confusion in the market.

The Court also addressed the validity of Scrum Alliance’s trademark registrations, observing that the plaintiff’s marks “CERTIFIED SCRUMMASTER”/”CSM” are prima facie valid, with registration being prima facie evidence of validity under Section 31(1) of the Trade Marks Act.

The matter is listed for further proceedings before the learned Joint Registrar (Judicial) on 15 December 2023. This ruling is expected to have far-reaching implications in the realm of certification and trademark rights, particularly for entities operating in multiple jurisdictions.

 

Date of Decision: 21 November 2023

SCRUM ALLIANCE, INC VS MR. PREM KUMAR S. & ORS.

 

Latest Legal News