Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Delhi High Court Upholds Scrum Alliance’s Trademark Rights; Injunction Granted Against “Certified Scrum Master” Use by Defendants

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling on trademark infringement, the Delhi High Court has upheld the rights of Scrum Alliance Inc., a U.S.-based certification organization, against the unauthorized use of its trademarks. The Court has granted an interlocutory injunction, restraining Mr. Prem Kumar S. And others from using the marks “CERTIFIED SCRUM MASTER” and an associated logo, which were found to be infringing upon Scrum Alliance’s registered Certification Trade Marks (CTMs).

Justice C. Hari Shankar, in his judgment, observed that the defendants’ use of deceptively similar marks constituted infringement of Scrum Alliance’s registered trademarks, stating, “The impugned marks ‘CSM’, ‘Certified Scrum Master’ and associated logo are similar – and, in the case of the mark CSM, identical – to the plaintiff’s registered CTMs.” He further added that “The defendants are clearly using the impugned marks as trademarks, as they are intended to indicate a connection in the course of trade between the services provided by the defendants and the impugned marks themselves.”

The Court, however, did not grant an injunction against the use of the word mark “CSM” by the defendants, as it is registered under the Trade Marks Act.

This decision marks a crucial precedent in the field of intellectual property law, especially concerning the software industry’s agile methodologies. Scrum Alliance Inc. Claims to be the largest and most influential Scrum certification organization globally, with significant presence in India. The judgment underscores the importance of protecting registered trademarks against potential infringement and confusion in the market.

The Court also addressed the validity of Scrum Alliance’s trademark registrations, observing that the plaintiff’s marks “CERTIFIED SCRUMMASTER”/”CSM” are prima facie valid, with registration being prima facie evidence of validity under Section 31(1) of the Trade Marks Act.

The matter is listed for further proceedings before the learned Joint Registrar (Judicial) on 15 December 2023. This ruling is expected to have far-reaching implications in the realm of certification and trademark rights, particularly for entities operating in multiple jurisdictions.

 

Date of Decision: 21 November 2023

SCRUM ALLIANCE, INC VS MR. PREM KUMAR S. & ORS.

 

Latest Legal News