MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Delhi High Court Upholds Scrum Alliance’s Trademark Rights; Injunction Granted Against “Certified Scrum Master” Use by Defendants

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling on trademark infringement, the Delhi High Court has upheld the rights of Scrum Alliance Inc., a U.S.-based certification organization, against the unauthorized use of its trademarks. The Court has granted an interlocutory injunction, restraining Mr. Prem Kumar S. And others from using the marks “CERTIFIED SCRUM MASTER” and an associated logo, which were found to be infringing upon Scrum Alliance’s registered Certification Trade Marks (CTMs).

Justice C. Hari Shankar, in his judgment, observed that the defendants’ use of deceptively similar marks constituted infringement of Scrum Alliance’s registered trademarks, stating, “The impugned marks ‘CSM’, ‘Certified Scrum Master’ and associated logo are similar – and, in the case of the mark CSM, identical – to the plaintiff’s registered CTMs.” He further added that “The defendants are clearly using the impugned marks as trademarks, as they are intended to indicate a connection in the course of trade between the services provided by the defendants and the impugned marks themselves.”

The Court, however, did not grant an injunction against the use of the word mark “CSM” by the defendants, as it is registered under the Trade Marks Act.

This decision marks a crucial precedent in the field of intellectual property law, especially concerning the software industry’s agile methodologies. Scrum Alliance Inc. Claims to be the largest and most influential Scrum certification organization globally, with significant presence in India. The judgment underscores the importance of protecting registered trademarks against potential infringement and confusion in the market.

The Court also addressed the validity of Scrum Alliance’s trademark registrations, observing that the plaintiff’s marks “CERTIFIED SCRUMMASTER”/”CSM” are prima facie valid, with registration being prima facie evidence of validity under Section 31(1) of the Trade Marks Act.

The matter is listed for further proceedings before the learned Joint Registrar (Judicial) on 15 December 2023. This ruling is expected to have far-reaching implications in the realm of certification and trademark rights, particularly for entities operating in multiple jurisdictions.

 

Date of Decision: 21 November 2023

SCRUM ALLIANCE, INC VS MR. PREM KUMAR S. & ORS.

 

Latest Legal News