Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Delhi High Court Upholds Property Rights and Orders Restoration of Water Tanks and Fire Safety Equipment on Building's Roof"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court has ruled in favor of property rights and ordered the restoration of essential facilities, including water tanks and fire safety equipment, on the roof of Akarshan Bhawan. The court's decision comes after a dispute over the use of the building's roof and unilateral removal of critical infrastructure.

The court observed, "The installation of the fire equipment and overhead water tanks are essential requirements for the use and enjoyment of the subject building and could not have been unilaterally removed by Respondent No. 4." The removal of these facilities had endangered the safety of the building's occupants.

The case revolved around the rights of the Appellants, who sought a declaration and injunction against the Respondents from making structural changes to the building without statutory permissions. The Appellants claimed easement rights for the maintenance of water tanks and the lift room on the roof.

Respondent No. 4 had purchased the roof rights but acknowledged the Appellants' right to access the roof for maintenance in a compromise deed. Despite this, Respondent No. 4 unilaterally removed the water tanks and fire safety equipment in October 2022.

The court emphasized the importance of these facilities, stating, "The reinstallation of the said equipment is necessary for the renewal of the fire safety certificate," and that "use of toilet facilities in a building is a basic human right."

Furthermore, the court directed that if Respondent No. 4 obtains building sanction for constructing an additional floor, the common facilities must be shifted to the roof of the new floor, but until then, Appellants must have uninterrupted access to the existing roof.

The judgment also mandated that the Appellants address deficiencies in fire safety and obtain the necessary Fire Safety Certificate. They were directed to provide a valid license for the existing lift in the building.

Date of Decision: 1 February 2024

Akarshan Bhawan VS Sushil Kumar Jain And Others

 

Latest Legal News