Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC

Delhi High Court Upholds Property Rights and Orders Restoration of Water Tanks and Fire Safety Equipment on Building's Roof"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court has ruled in favor of property rights and ordered the restoration of essential facilities, including water tanks and fire safety equipment, on the roof of Akarshan Bhawan. The court's decision comes after a dispute over the use of the building's roof and unilateral removal of critical infrastructure.

The court observed, "The installation of the fire equipment and overhead water tanks are essential requirements for the use and enjoyment of the subject building and could not have been unilaterally removed by Respondent No. 4." The removal of these facilities had endangered the safety of the building's occupants.

The case revolved around the rights of the Appellants, who sought a declaration and injunction against the Respondents from making structural changes to the building without statutory permissions. The Appellants claimed easement rights for the maintenance of water tanks and the lift room on the roof.

Respondent No. 4 had purchased the roof rights but acknowledged the Appellants' right to access the roof for maintenance in a compromise deed. Despite this, Respondent No. 4 unilaterally removed the water tanks and fire safety equipment in October 2022.

The court emphasized the importance of these facilities, stating, "The reinstallation of the said equipment is necessary for the renewal of the fire safety certificate," and that "use of toilet facilities in a building is a basic human right."

Furthermore, the court directed that if Respondent No. 4 obtains building sanction for constructing an additional floor, the common facilities must be shifted to the roof of the new floor, but until then, Appellants must have uninterrupted access to the existing roof.

The judgment also mandated that the Appellants address deficiencies in fire safety and obtain the necessary Fire Safety Certificate. They were directed to provide a valid license for the existing lift in the building.

Date of Decision: 1 February 2024

Akarshan Bhawan VS Sushil Kumar Jain And Others

 

Latest Legal News