Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court

Delhi High Court Upholds Property Rights and Orders Restoration of Water Tanks and Fire Safety Equipment on Building's Roof"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court has ruled in favor of property rights and ordered the restoration of essential facilities, including water tanks and fire safety equipment, on the roof of Akarshan Bhawan. The court's decision comes after a dispute over the use of the building's roof and unilateral removal of critical infrastructure.

The court observed, "The installation of the fire equipment and overhead water tanks are essential requirements for the use and enjoyment of the subject building and could not have been unilaterally removed by Respondent No. 4." The removal of these facilities had endangered the safety of the building's occupants.

The case revolved around the rights of the Appellants, who sought a declaration and injunction against the Respondents from making structural changes to the building without statutory permissions. The Appellants claimed easement rights for the maintenance of water tanks and the lift room on the roof.

Respondent No. 4 had purchased the roof rights but acknowledged the Appellants' right to access the roof for maintenance in a compromise deed. Despite this, Respondent No. 4 unilaterally removed the water tanks and fire safety equipment in October 2022.

The court emphasized the importance of these facilities, stating, "The reinstallation of the said equipment is necessary for the renewal of the fire safety certificate," and that "use of toilet facilities in a building is a basic human right."

Furthermore, the court directed that if Respondent No. 4 obtains building sanction for constructing an additional floor, the common facilities must be shifted to the roof of the new floor, but until then, Appellants must have uninterrupted access to the existing roof.

The judgment also mandated that the Appellants address deficiencies in fire safety and obtain the necessary Fire Safety Certificate. They were directed to provide a valid license for the existing lift in the building.

Date of Decision: 1 February 2024

Akarshan Bhawan VS Sushil Kumar Jain And Others

 

Latest Legal News