Even 1.5 Years in Jail Doesn’t Dilute Section 37 NDPS Rigour: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in 710 Kg Poppy Husk Case Stay of Conviction Nullifies Disqualification Under Section 8(3) RP Act: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Against Rahul Gandhi Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Uncover ₹2 Crore MGNREGA Scam: Kerala High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail for Vendors in Corruption Case Order 41 Rule 23 CPC | Trial Court Cannot Decide Title Solely on a Vacated Judgment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes By Bar Associations Cannot Stall Justice: Allahabad High Court Holds Office Bearers Liable for Contempt if Revenue Suits Are Delayed Due to Boycotts To Constitute a Service PE, Services Must Be Furnished Within India Through Employees Present in India: Delhi High Court Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation Waiver of Right Under Section 50 NDPS is Valid Even Without Panch Signatures: Bombay High Court Agricultural Land Is 'Property' Under Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937: A.P. High Court Tenant Who Pays Rent After Verifying Landlord’s Will Cannot Dispute His Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Eviction Challenge by HP State Cooperative Bank Clever Drafting Cannot Override Limitation Bar: Gujarat High Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance Once Divorce by Mutual Consent Is Final, Wife Cannot Pursue Criminal Case for Stridhan Without Reserving Right to Do So: Himachal Pradesh High Court Caste-Based Insults Must Show Intent – Mere Abuse Not Enough for Atrocities Act: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Represent to Detaining Authority Vitiates NSA Detention: Gauhati High Court Awarding Further Interest On Penal Charges Is Contrary To Fundamental Policy Of Indian Arbitration Law: Bombay High Court

Delhi High Court Upholds Mother's Interim Custody of Abducted Child Warned Against Fleeing

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court issued a significant ruling in a habeas corpus case, upholding the interim custody of a minor child who had been abducted by the father. The case involved a Ukrainian mother, Ms. Gupta Snizhana Grygorivna, who sought the custody of her three-year-old son, Master Gupta Sameer Akhileshovych. The judgment, delivered on October 20, 2023, by the bench of HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR, emphasized the importance of preserving the child's well-being and preventing any further unauthorized movement.

The court's observation highlighted the gravity of the situation, stating, "The child of the parties was born on 12.02.2019 in Ukraine. Respondent no.5/father had abducted the child in gross violation of court orders and crossed international borders. This led to the filing of the present habeas corpus petition by the petitioner."

The judgment granted interim custody of the child to the mother, with specific conditions, and also addressed the issue of visitation rights sought by the father. Respondent no.5/husband had expressed concerns that the petitioner, being a Ukrainian citizen, might attempt to leave the country with the child. In response, the court granted liberty to the respondents to approach the appropriate forum within three weeks if needed, while directing the petitioner not to leave the country for at least three weeks.

The court's decision underlined the primary focus on the child's welfare and the need to adhere to court orders. It stated, "The relief sought in the present petition has already been granted, and no further orders are required. The issue of interim custody or visitation rights in respect of the minor child is to be dealt with by the learned Family Court."

This judgment serves as a reminder of the courts' commitment to safeguarding the rights and interests of minor children caught in complex legal disputes involving custody and visitation.

 Date of Decision: October 20, 2023

MS GUPTA SNIZHANA GRYGORIVNA  vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/20-Oct-2023-Ms-Gupta-Vs-UOI.pdf"]

Latest Legal News