Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

Delhi High Court Upholds Mother's Interim Custody of Abducted Child Warned Against Fleeing

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court issued a significant ruling in a habeas corpus case, upholding the interim custody of a minor child who had been abducted by the father. The case involved a Ukrainian mother, Ms. Gupta Snizhana Grygorivna, who sought the custody of her three-year-old son, Master Gupta Sameer Akhileshovych. The judgment, delivered on October 20, 2023, by the bench of HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR, emphasized the importance of preserving the child's well-being and preventing any further unauthorized movement.

The court's observation highlighted the gravity of the situation, stating, "The child of the parties was born on 12.02.2019 in Ukraine. Respondent no.5/father had abducted the child in gross violation of court orders and crossed international borders. This led to the filing of the present habeas corpus petition by the petitioner."

The judgment granted interim custody of the child to the mother, with specific conditions, and also addressed the issue of visitation rights sought by the father. Respondent no.5/husband had expressed concerns that the petitioner, being a Ukrainian citizen, might attempt to leave the country with the child. In response, the court granted liberty to the respondents to approach the appropriate forum within three weeks if needed, while directing the petitioner not to leave the country for at least three weeks.

The court's decision underlined the primary focus on the child's welfare and the need to adhere to court orders. It stated, "The relief sought in the present petition has already been granted, and no further orders are required. The issue of interim custody or visitation rights in respect of the minor child is to be dealt with by the learned Family Court."

This judgment serves as a reminder of the courts' commitment to safeguarding the rights and interests of minor children caught in complex legal disputes involving custody and visitation.

 Date of Decision: October 20, 2023

MS GUPTA SNIZHANA GRYGORIVNA  vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/20-Oct-2023-Ms-Gupta-Vs-UOI.pdf"]

Similar News