UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Delhi High Court Upholds Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty: 'Reckless, False and Defamatory Allegations Against Husband Amount to Cruelty'

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court, comprising a Division Bench of Justices Suresh Kumar Kait and Neena Bansal Krishna, affirmed the grant of divorce to a husband on grounds of cruelty by the wife. The judgment, delivered on December 11, 2023, in the case of Rashmi vs. Manoj, emphasizes the severity of false accusations in marital relationships.

The Court observed that the appellant-wife's conduct, including denying sex, filing false complaints, and making defamatory allegations against her husband and his family, constituted cruelty under Section 13(1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. "Reckless, false and defamatory allegations against the husband and family members would have an effect of lowering their reputation in the eyes of the society and it amounts to cruelty," the Court noted, referencing its decision and Supreme Court precedents.

The couple, who married in 2011, faced a troubled relationship with allegations of dowry demands, physical and emotional abuse, and discord. The appellant accused her husband of having illicit relations with his sister-in-law and filed multiple legal complaints against him and his family members. The Court highlighted that the appellant's actions, particularly the continuous pursuit of legal cases despite a mutual settlement, exemplified cruelty towards the husband.

The respondent-husband's plea for divorce was initially granted by the Family Court on grounds of cruelty, a decision that the Delhi High Court upheld. The Court found the appellant’s accusations against her husband to be baseless and damaging to his reputation, further stating, “Mere filing of various complaints before different forums does not in any way prove the allegations of cruelty, and the onus was upon the appellant to prove the cruelty which has been meted upon her.”

In dismissing the appellant's appeal, the Court underlined the importance of genuine reconciliation efforts and the impact of unfounded allegations in matrimonial disputes. The ruling sets a precedent in understanding the dynamics of cruelty in marital relationships and the legal implications of false accusations.

Date of Decision: 11-12-2023 

Rashmi vs. Manoj 

 

Latest Legal News