Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Delhi High Court Upholds Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty: 'Reckless, False and Defamatory Allegations Against Husband Amount to Cruelty'

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court, comprising a Division Bench of Justices Suresh Kumar Kait and Neena Bansal Krishna, affirmed the grant of divorce to a husband on grounds of cruelty by the wife. The judgment, delivered on December 11, 2023, in the case of Rashmi vs. Manoj, emphasizes the severity of false accusations in marital relationships.

The Court observed that the appellant-wife's conduct, including denying sex, filing false complaints, and making defamatory allegations against her husband and his family, constituted cruelty under Section 13(1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. "Reckless, false and defamatory allegations against the husband and family members would have an effect of lowering their reputation in the eyes of the society and it amounts to cruelty," the Court noted, referencing its decision and Supreme Court precedents.

The couple, who married in 2011, faced a troubled relationship with allegations of dowry demands, physical and emotional abuse, and discord. The appellant accused her husband of having illicit relations with his sister-in-law and filed multiple legal complaints against him and his family members. The Court highlighted that the appellant's actions, particularly the continuous pursuit of legal cases despite a mutual settlement, exemplified cruelty towards the husband.

The respondent-husband's plea for divorce was initially granted by the Family Court on grounds of cruelty, a decision that the Delhi High Court upheld. The Court found the appellant’s accusations against her husband to be baseless and damaging to his reputation, further stating, “Mere filing of various complaints before different forums does not in any way prove the allegations of cruelty, and the onus was upon the appellant to prove the cruelty which has been meted upon her.”

In dismissing the appellant's appeal, the Court underlined the importance of genuine reconciliation efforts and the impact of unfounded allegations in matrimonial disputes. The ruling sets a precedent in understanding the dynamics of cruelty in marital relationships and the legal implications of false accusations.

Date of Decision: 11-12-2023 

Rashmi vs. Manoj 

 

Latest Legal News