Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction In Child Sexual Assault Case - Victim's Statements Consistent And Corroborated By Her Mother's Account

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a significant verdict, the Delhi High Court, through Justice Amit Bansal, upheld the conviction and sentence of an appellant found guilty of offences under Sections 342/363/376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO). The judgment, delivered on August 14, 2023, follows an appeal challenging the lower court's decision to convict the appellant.

The case revolved around the alleged sexual assault of a minor girl, who was just four and a half years old at the time of the incident. The appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment based on his conviction under the said sections and acts. The trial court had convicted the appellant after considering the victim's testimony, medical evidence, and corroborating statements.

The judgment highlighted the importance of evaluating evidence while not attaching undue importance to minor discrepancies. It emphasized the credibility and reliability of the victim's testimony, taking into account the age of the victim. The court underscored that the absence of injuries does not necessarily negate the commission of a penetrative sexual assault.

The appellant's defense argued against the credibility of the victim's statements, pointing out inconsistencies. However, the court found that the victim's statements were consistent across various instances and corroborated by her mother's account. The judgment also referenced the statutory presumption under Section 29 of the POCSO Act, which strengthened the prosecution's case.

The court dismissed the appellant's appeal, concluding that the conviction was valid and well-supported by the evidence presented. The judgment reaffirmed the court's commitment to protecting the rights of victims, particularly in cases involving sexual offences against children. It highlighted the significance of proper adjudication and evaluation of evidence in such cases.

This landmark judgment underlines the court's commitment to ensuring justice and safeguarding the rights of victims in cases of child sexual assault. It serves as a precedent for similar cases and reiterates the importance of meticulous evaluation of evidence while upholding the principles of fairness and justice.

Date of Decision: August 14, 2023

RANJEET KUMAR YADAV   vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

                

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Ranjeet_Kumar_Yadav_vs_State_Of_Nct_Of_Delhi_on_14_August_2023_DelHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News