Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction In Child Sexual Assault Case - Victim's Statements Consistent And Corroborated By Her Mother's Account

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant verdict, the Delhi High Court, through Justice Amit Bansal, upheld the conviction and sentence of an appellant found guilty of offences under Sections 342/363/376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO). The judgment, delivered on August 14, 2023, follows an appeal challenging the lower court's decision to convict the appellant.

The case revolved around the alleged sexual assault of a minor girl, who was just four and a half years old at the time of the incident. The appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment based on his conviction under the said sections and acts. The trial court had convicted the appellant after considering the victim's testimony, medical evidence, and corroborating statements.

The judgment highlighted the importance of evaluating evidence while not attaching undue importance to minor discrepancies. It emphasized the credibility and reliability of the victim's testimony, taking into account the age of the victim. The court underscored that the absence of injuries does not necessarily negate the commission of a penetrative sexual assault.

The appellant's defense argued against the credibility of the victim's statements, pointing out inconsistencies. However, the court found that the victim's statements were consistent across various instances and corroborated by her mother's account. The judgment also referenced the statutory presumption under Section 29 of the POCSO Act, which strengthened the prosecution's case.

The court dismissed the appellant's appeal, concluding that the conviction was valid and well-supported by the evidence presented. The judgment reaffirmed the court's commitment to protecting the rights of victims, particularly in cases involving sexual offences against children. It highlighted the significance of proper adjudication and evaluation of evidence in such cases.

This landmark judgment underlines the court's commitment to ensuring justice and safeguarding the rights of victims in cases of child sexual assault. It serves as a precedent for similar cases and reiterates the importance of meticulous evaluation of evidence while upholding the principles of fairness and justice.

Date of Decision: August 14, 2023

RANJEET KUMAR YADAV   vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

                

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Ranjeet_Kumar_Yadav_vs_State_Of_Nct_Of_Delhi_on_14_August_2023_DelHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News