Inadequate Explanation Under Section 313 CrPC Cannot Be Foundation For Conviction If Prosecution Fails To Prove Case: Allahabad High Court No-Confidence Motion In Housing Societies Fails If 2/3 Majority Not Met; Fractions In Voting Threshold Cannot Be Rounded Down: Bombay High Court Successor Rent Controller Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence Or Act As Appellate Court Under Review Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Restores Eviction Order Article 21 Overrides PMLA Section 45 Rigors In Cases Of Unduly Long Incarceration Without Trial: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail To SSC Scam ‘Middleman’ Unregistered Family Partition Deed Recording Past Oral Arrangement Doesn't Require Compulsory Registration: Gujarat High Court Private Banks Acting As Authorised Dealers Under FEMA Amenable To Writ Jurisdiction; Can Refuse Transactions For 'Sanctions-Related' Concerns: Gauhati High Court Non-Examination Of Investigating Officer Not Fatal To Prosecution Case If Eyewitness Testimony Is Credible & Trustworthy: Jharkhand High Court Mere Denial Of Signature Insufficient When Execution Is Proved Through Endorsements: Karnataka High Court Restores Specific Performance Decree Sectarianism Claims Can't Discredit Reliable Testimony Of Child Sexual Abuse Victim: Kerala High Court Upholds Madrassa Teacher's Conviction State Must Prove Specific 'Public Interest' To Exempt Projects From Social Impact Assessment Under Section 10A Land Acquisition Act: Telangana High Court Or 2 Rule 2 CPC |Failure To Seek Specific Performance In Earlier Injunction Suit Bars Subsequent Claim; Readiness & Willingness Must Be Continuous: Madras High Court Exoneration In Departmental Proceedings Does Not Result In Automatic Discharge In Criminal Case: Orissa High Court History Sheet Can Be Opened On 'Reasonable Belief' Even Without Conviction, But Must Be Reviewed After 7 Years Of Good Conduct: Rajasthan High Court

Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction In Child Sexual Assault Case - Victim's Statements Consistent And Corroborated By Her Mother's Account

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant verdict, the Delhi High Court, through Justice Amit Bansal, upheld the conviction and sentence of an appellant found guilty of offences under Sections 342/363/376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO). The judgment, delivered on August 14, 2023, follows an appeal challenging the lower court's decision to convict the appellant.

The case revolved around the alleged sexual assault of a minor girl, who was just four and a half years old at the time of the incident. The appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment based on his conviction under the said sections and acts. The trial court had convicted the appellant after considering the victim's testimony, medical evidence, and corroborating statements.

The judgment highlighted the importance of evaluating evidence while not attaching undue importance to minor discrepancies. It emphasized the credibility and reliability of the victim's testimony, taking into account the age of the victim. The court underscored that the absence of injuries does not necessarily negate the commission of a penetrative sexual assault.

The appellant's defense argued against the credibility of the victim's statements, pointing out inconsistencies. However, the court found that the victim's statements were consistent across various instances and corroborated by her mother's account. The judgment also referenced the statutory presumption under Section 29 of the POCSO Act, which strengthened the prosecution's case.

The court dismissed the appellant's appeal, concluding that the conviction was valid and well-supported by the evidence presented. The judgment reaffirmed the court's commitment to protecting the rights of victims, particularly in cases involving sexual offences against children. It highlighted the significance of proper adjudication and evaluation of evidence in such cases.

This landmark judgment underlines the court's commitment to ensuring justice and safeguarding the rights of victims in cases of child sexual assault. It serves as a precedent for similar cases and reiterates the importance of meticulous evaluation of evidence while upholding the principles of fairness and justice.

Date of Decision: August 14, 2023

RANJEET KUMAR YADAV   vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

                

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Ranjeet_Kumar_Yadav_vs_State_Of_Nct_Of_Delhi_on_14_August_2023_DelHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News